Surprise, surprise...as always, flaming by Chess Squares...
Roach-Busters
10-09-2004, 18:36
My God, can this guy manage to not flame? All he can do is be vulgar and insult people. He is really, really, really starting to piss me off!
Tuesday Heights
10-09-2004, 18:40
Couldn't you have posted this in the other thread on this very page regarding this so-called dilemma? Also, just saying someone is flaming isn't enough to prove their guilt, you must always supply evidence.
Roach-Busters
10-09-2004, 18:42
Oh, sorry, I forgot to post the link. Here you go:
http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=356090&page=5&pp=15
Greenmanbry
10-09-2004, 18:44
He's not the only one who flames.. There are several people who are just as bad, if not worse, than he is.
Roach-Busters
10-09-2004, 18:47
He's not the only one who flames.. There are several people who are just as bad, if not worse, than he is.
Are you serious? :eek:
Greenmanbry
10-09-2004, 18:56
Yes..
Because Chess Squares may become extremely frustrated with the many bigots who post on the NS forum, he tends to voice his rage through using the phrases that might constitute "flaming".. those you mentioned in the link above..
See.. this is vocal flaming.. but other characters, and I can supply names, but won't, on that same thread, are bigots.. IGNORANT bigots.. who, quite frankly, offended me greatly..
But, I have been told to avoid posting in the NS General forum, so I simply look at those posts and laugh.. laugh at their ignorance.. at their bigotry.
Because if I follow CS's way, I would flame so much I would be forumbanned in a minute, and we don't want that now, do we?
I understand the above makes no sense at all, forgive me, I am simply too mad to type a coherent post. What I want to say is.. some ignorant idiots on the General board are offending a large portion of this community on a daily basis, but this portion tends to stay quiet.. because they are extremely discrimnated against.
Roach-Busters
10-09-2004, 19:02
That still doesn't give CS the right to act like a complete jerk.
Greenmanbry
10-09-2004, 19:07
Perhaps he is retaliating against a complete jerk??.. and can only sink to that jerks's level?
I'm not saying his flaming is right.. It's wrong.. but he's on the opposite side of the political spectrum if we take your position as a frame of reference.. So you might recognize his flaming, but not your friends's..
Hmm.. I never flamed, and I prefer to stay level-headed.. Which is impossible on the General forum, so you have to warn him cordially.. he might have over-reacted.
Roach-Busters
10-09-2004, 19:16
Perhaps he is retaliating against a complete jerk??.. and can only sink to that jerks's level?
No, he acts that way toward everyone who disagrees with him, whether that person is a jerk or not.
Tuesday Heights
10-09-2004, 19:38
This isn't the place to debate over someone's temperment; be patient, and wait for a moderator's response.
From what i see, he disagrees with people you agree with so you hate him. he gave his side, they gave theirs, he tore into them, they tore into him, the circle continues, let it die.
Roach-Busters
10-09-2004, 19:39
This isn't the place to debate over someone's temperment; be patient, and wait for a moderator's response.
All right.
Roach-Busters
10-09-2004, 19:42
From what i see, he disagrees with people you agree with so you hate him. he gave his side, they gave theirs, he tore into them, they tore into him, the circle continues, let it die.
A)I don't hate him
B)He doesn't merely "disagree"; he flames the hell out of people, and is vulgar, profane, and extremely rude
C)90% of the time he's the one who starts the flaming
D)Most of the people who don't agree with him disagree courteously; however, he is incapable of cordial debate, and flames anyone who disagrees with him regardless of whether they were disagreed in a friendly manner or not
Tuesday Heights
10-09-2004, 19:48
Roach-Busters, by continuing to talk about Chess Squards in this fashion, you are encouraging him/her to come into this thread and respond with flaming; that is called flamebait.
Roach-Busters
10-09-2004, 19:52
Roach-Busters, by continuing to talk about Chess Squards in this fashion, you are encouraging him/her to come into this thread and respond with flaming; that is called flamebait.
I was just answering the others' questions, is all. I'm not trying to flamebait anyone.
Katganistan
10-09-2004, 22:34
As I said last night on another thread -- Chess Squares' behavior seems no worse than anyone else's on that thread, and I read several pages after the one you indicated as well. As a matter of fact, there seemed to be some baiting going on there (congratulating him on being able to debate without childish insult hurling, I believe -- a backhanded compliment).
I'll post asking everyone to tone down the heated language, but honestly, if you two don't get along, please, just don't respond to each other.