Abu Hamza
26-08-2004, 10:56
A few hours ago a number of nations in the Baghdad region were edited by The Emerald Heights of The SLAGLands.
I'm not disputing the decision (what's done is done), but I would like to know a bit more about why it was taken (so the region's players can avoid the caprice of this mod in the future).
The only information we have so far is that our nations were edited because The SLAGLands 'grew weary' of our jokes 'and decided to give us what for' (SLAGlands own words).
Please feel free to answer as many or as few as you see fit.
Firstly, I was told the national animal and currency violated the site's TOS - by which you mean the Terms and Conditions of Use? How? (You understand it is impossible to stick to the rules if you don't tell us what they are).
Secondly, it'd been like that for - um, about two years, maybe? Why was the decision to edit taken now? Was there any reason at all for the timing of the decision? Was it because of a complaint (which I would understand)?
Thirdly, 'satiric content and ... views and opinions exagerated for the purposes of parody' - is this now totally prohibited?
I'm not disputing the decision (what's done is done), but I would like to know a bit more about why it was taken (so the region's players can avoid the caprice of this mod in the future).
The only information we have so far is that our nations were edited because The SLAGLands 'grew weary' of our jokes 'and decided to give us what for' (SLAGlands own words).
Please feel free to answer as many or as few as you see fit.
Firstly, I was told the national animal and currency violated the site's TOS - by which you mean the Terms and Conditions of Use? How? (You understand it is impossible to stick to the rules if you don't tell us what they are).
Secondly, it'd been like that for - um, about two years, maybe? Why was the decision to edit taken now? Was there any reason at all for the timing of the decision? Was it because of a complaint (which I would understand)?
Thirdly, 'satiric content and ... views and opinions exagerated for the purposes of parody' - is this now totally prohibited?