NationStates Jolt Archive

http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=350564

http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=350564
How was it "over the line?"

How was it "over the line?"

It was revolting and racist! :mad:

"negro beast"

How was it "over the line?"

Besides which, is was blatant flamebait asking for those who disagreed to come back flaming at you and your racism.

I would agree. I would also add that his attacks on other non-whites are also over the line. Plenty of hate in Tenete.

I second that opinion: TT is getting out of hand and very flamebaity. This thread reminds me of FWS, which is not a good memory...

This thread reminds me of FWS, which is not a good memory...

Who? :confused:

Who? :confused:

Don't ask. ;)

A guy who was DEATed, then again, and again, and again, and again, ......, and again until he got a DoS on him.

:rolleyes: Stupid people never cease to amaze me, i think rascist are morons.

How was it "over the line?"

I never stated that it was: note the question mark.

I never stated that it was: note the question mark.
his views on the Jews and the Blacks and the way he expresses those views are inexcusable. "mudpeople" "negro beasts" and "the only culture they brought was their beastly instincts to lie and steal"
all these views are on the thread "Jewish Power in America" which was since closed.

his views on the Jews and the Blacks and the way he expresses those views are inexcusable. "mudpeople" "negro beasts" and "the only culture they brought was their beastly instincts to lie and steal"
all these views are on the thread "Jewish Power in America" which was since closed.

He is as 'entitled' to hold those views as we are to hold the contrary ones. There does, however, come a certain point where the framing context which is used to express those views, or the terminology employed may cross the line into flamebaiting or other prohibited behaviour. Provided a racist/neo-Nazi/fascist/White Supremacist/Stalinist/anti-semite/Zionist/whatever stays within the boundaries of behaviour as laid down in the Terms and Conditions, Ettiquette FAQ and Acceptable Behaviour sticky, then they have an equal right to express their opinions on this board as anyone else that agreed to the same conditions as they did.

He is as 'entitled' to hold those views as we are to hold the contrary ones. There does, however, come a certain point where the framing context which is used to express those views, or the terminology employed may cross the line into flamebaiting or other prohibited behaviour. Provided a racist/neo-Nazi/fascist/White Supremacist/Stalinist/anti-semite/Zionist/whatever stays within the boundaries of behaviour as laid down in the Terms and Conditions, Ettiquette FAQ and Acceptable Behaviour sticky, then they have an equal right to express their opinions on this board as anyone else that agreed to the same conditions as they did.
he can say whatever he wants (to within a certain extent) but he can refer to Blacks as Blacks not as "mudpeople" or "negro beasts"

Which reminds me,
"negro beast"
Hey, watch your language ( No, no text-on-screen puns please, I can do it myself ) or I'll report you to Moderation ! ;)

he can say whatever he wants (to within a certain extent) but he can refer to Blacks as Blacks not as "mudpeople" or "negro beasts"

Which is why I said " the terminology employed may cross the line into flamebaiting or other prohibited behaviour".

Which is why I said " the terminology employed MAY??? cross the line into flamebaiting or other prohibited behaviour".
there is no may about it.

there is no may about it.

That is not for me to judge: that is why we have mods.