NationStates Jolt Archive


LOOK MODS!!

Japaica
27-06-2004, 04:35
Look at the hate Demonic Terrorists is showing against Jews, Catholics, and me. Please read both pages.

http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=156135&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

I hope he gets warned for this.
Bodies Without Organs
27-06-2004, 04:41
Look at the hate Demonic Terrorists is showing against Jews, Catholics, and me. Please read both pages.

Do you really think that drawing attention to a thread where your first contribution to a roleplay is "F*** YOU" is a good idea?
Japaica
27-06-2004, 04:42
Look at the hate Demonic Terrorists is showing against Jews, Catholics, and me. Please read both pages.

Do you really think that drawing attention to a thread where your first contribution to a roleplay is "F*** YOU" is a good idea?

What he said was much much worse. It was deserved. I should edit that though, shouldnt i?
IDF
27-06-2004, 04:42
Both of you will get warned in most cases. Japaica, you did flame him, lets see what the mods say here. I like you and hope nothing bad happens to you here.

<not a mod>
IDF
27-06-2004, 04:43
Look at the hate Demonic Terrorists is showing against Jews, Catholics, and me. Please read both pages.

Do you really think that drawing attention to a thread where your first contribution to a roleplay is "F*** YOU" is a good idea?

What he said was much much worse. It was deserved. I should edit that though, shouldnt i?
wouldn't hurt
Japaica
27-06-2004, 04:43
There. Now it says fudge you. :D
Myrth
27-06-2004, 04:45
Locked.
Automagfreek
27-06-2004, 04:45
Dude, it's an RP. You can get in trouble for killing Jews and Christians in an RP.....
Japaica
27-06-2004, 04:46
Locked.

Thanks Myrth. And I'll try not to flame at shear flamebait stupidity. :D
Bodies Without Organs
27-06-2004, 04:49
What he said was much much worse. It was deserved. I should edit that though, shouldnt i?

Look: it doesn't work that way here: firstly he flamed you back because you flamed him first. Therefore you instigated the whole sordid affair. He was in the wrong for returning the flames. Secondly, even if he had of flamed you first, that doesn't mean you would get a free ticket to flame him back.

Go and have a read at the sticky:

http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=87887

"Flame: Expressing anger at someone in uncouth ways with OOC comments (i.e. swearing, being obnoxious, threatening etc.)"

Note that flaming is a forbidden action.

Note that there is no caveat which allows flaming under provocation.
Japaica
27-06-2004, 04:51
What he said was much much worse. It was deserved. I should edit that though, shouldnt i?

Look: it doesn't work that way here: firstly he flamed you back because you flamed him first. Therefore you instigated the whole sordid affair. He was in the wrong for returning the flames. Secondly, even if he had of flamed you first, that doesn't mean you would get a free ticket to flame him back.

Go and have a read at the sticky:

http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=87887

"Flame: Expressing anger at someone in uncouth ways with OOC comments (i.e. swearing, being obnoxious, threatening etc.)"

Note that flaming is a forbidden action.

Note that there is no caveat which allows flaming under provocation.

Oh well. Lesson learned. But, my intent was for the thread to be locked. At least it got locked and he was warned.