Holy panooly
25-04-2004, 12:09
Before I'm going to express my opinions I'll give everyone a short summary of what happened.
Click here (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=139466) for the full story.
The HLF started with roleplaying a terrorist attack on Credonia. All went well until Credonia came up with a msn conversation (The MSN conversation can be seen here (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=139466&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=100): (source: Huzen Hagen). Scroll down until you see it.) which contained "evidence" about the HLF's actions against Credonia. He sent out units to intercept the airplane, and the roleplay was done. Huzen Hagen, The HLF, me and a few others were most displeased with this low way of getting rid of a well written roleplay. Obviously, we concluded Credonia couldn't take a loss and ignored everyone assiociated with the roleplay. (Me, Huzen Hagen and The HLF) because we kept saying to him to continue the roleplay. Credonia didn't want to do it because he's busy with 5 other roleplays. That's his second excuse for not having to roleplay this.
The third excuse is a complete ignore just because we're fed up with his lies and lame excuses.
As for Austar Union, the only thing I can say about it is that I shouldn't have stopped the RP but you could at least replied to my thread where I stated that your base was destroyed (it was only an assumtion his base was destroyed because he clearly didn't showed any interest in the thread) And perhaps an offer to replay it all? No reply whatsoever from his side. Furthermore, now he says I label him as a bad roleplayer after all this. I may have jumped into conclusions too early but it's quite easy to say, and I hereby quote Fruity Loops, "If he had done this, that would have happened for sure" kind of talk. Speaking about a situation after everything happened is the easiest way of working out an excuse for yourself and accusations for the other.
I'm not going to judge the roleplays and the stories since they're just fine. The 2 persons Austar Union and Credonia are also good people to play with, don't get me wrong there. As long as nothing happens related to terrorism and war that is. It's just when a situation develops and there's no way out, they start godmodding and making up stories about irrelevent things. In the past there has been so much godmodding. I even had to defend myself in a thread why I ignored a large invasion because simple and straight to the point replies weren't enough for them. This can be seen here (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=133644&highlight=).
Now about my own opinion on this difficult issue. I'm pretty fucking fed up with this whole mess and when a moderator looks at this the whole thread has been reduced to a shitload of bickering, whining and flaming. Lots of people are tired of this way of getting away with your skin. This is low and pathetic and the ones who use these tactics shouldn't be allowed in II.
I hope the moderators can do something about this because it's getting on my nerves. Plus, the whole idea of "fair play" has been thrown away.
Click here (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=139466) for the full story.
The HLF started with roleplaying a terrorist attack on Credonia. All went well until Credonia came up with a msn conversation (The MSN conversation can be seen here (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=139466&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=100): (source: Huzen Hagen). Scroll down until you see it.) which contained "evidence" about the HLF's actions against Credonia. He sent out units to intercept the airplane, and the roleplay was done. Huzen Hagen, The HLF, me and a few others were most displeased with this low way of getting rid of a well written roleplay. Obviously, we concluded Credonia couldn't take a loss and ignored everyone assiociated with the roleplay. (Me, Huzen Hagen and The HLF) because we kept saying to him to continue the roleplay. Credonia didn't want to do it because he's busy with 5 other roleplays. That's his second excuse for not having to roleplay this.
The third excuse is a complete ignore just because we're fed up with his lies and lame excuses.
As for Austar Union, the only thing I can say about it is that I shouldn't have stopped the RP but you could at least replied to my thread where I stated that your base was destroyed (it was only an assumtion his base was destroyed because he clearly didn't showed any interest in the thread) And perhaps an offer to replay it all? No reply whatsoever from his side. Furthermore, now he says I label him as a bad roleplayer after all this. I may have jumped into conclusions too early but it's quite easy to say, and I hereby quote Fruity Loops, "If he had done this, that would have happened for sure" kind of talk. Speaking about a situation after everything happened is the easiest way of working out an excuse for yourself and accusations for the other.
I'm not going to judge the roleplays and the stories since they're just fine. The 2 persons Austar Union and Credonia are also good people to play with, don't get me wrong there. As long as nothing happens related to terrorism and war that is. It's just when a situation develops and there's no way out, they start godmodding and making up stories about irrelevent things. In the past there has been so much godmodding. I even had to defend myself in a thread why I ignored a large invasion because simple and straight to the point replies weren't enough for them. This can be seen here (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=133644&highlight=).
Now about my own opinion on this difficult issue. I'm pretty fucking fed up with this whole mess and when a moderator looks at this the whole thread has been reduced to a shitload of bickering, whining and flaming. Lots of people are tired of this way of getting away with your skin. This is low and pathetic and the ones who use these tactics shouldn't be allowed in II.
I hope the moderators can do something about this because it's getting on my nerves. Plus, the whole idea of "fair play" has been thrown away.