Steel Butterfly
13-03-2004, 21:45
Last post of: http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=117853&start=320
Third post of: http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=117853&start=340
After he spammed in page 17 of my RP (spam is roughly defined as unwanted messages) I posted telling him not to, and giving him options to discuss my decision on my RP. He then decided to rant on about how he can role play and challege me and stuff, distracting the thread from the topic of my Civil War.
His knowledge of basic grammar does not exclude him from obtaining the title of spammer, and I hope that this is dealt with swiftly, in the name of all RPers.
If we cannot guarrentee that our RP's will be open to those who we wish to RP with, than having an RP seems rather pointless. I resent his posts, both his IC one and his OOC one. I would ask you to delete only his OOC one though, because while his IC one is just bad RPing, his OOC one takes up too much room and is nothing more than flamebait.
Thank you.
Third post of: http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=117853&start=340
After he spammed in page 17 of my RP (spam is roughly defined as unwanted messages) I posted telling him not to, and giving him options to discuss my decision on my RP. He then decided to rant on about how he can role play and challege me and stuff, distracting the thread from the topic of my Civil War.
His knowledge of basic grammar does not exclude him from obtaining the title of spammer, and I hope that this is dealt with swiftly, in the name of all RPers.
If we cannot guarrentee that our RP's will be open to those who we wish to RP with, than having an RP seems rather pointless. I resent his posts, both his IC one and his OOC one. I would ask you to delete only his OOC one though, because while his IC one is just bad RPing, his OOC one takes up too much room and is nothing more than flamebait.
Thank you.