NationStates Jolt Archive

I am grazon former leader of the imperial order of frith a region of over 100+ nations that was destroyed by greifers. The region was then brought back by Div4 who yes got deleted (dont get mad at me about what Div4 does i cant stop him) anyways we all agreed to get the region back so Two un went in to take control of the region (the other is Xenophobic pussoms) and remove everyone so I could recreate it. All the antions in the region agreed to this or were not active to do so. Any antions wishing to return to the IOOF can do so when it is recreated. I am just asking that the 2nd imperial diet is revived because he did ntothing wrong, just trying to get back control of the region that he and I had worked on to create.

All the antions in the region agreed to this or were not active to do so.

Therein lies the problem. All residents have to agree to the refounding and leave the region of their own accord.

Do not use Delegate powers to empty a region. It is illegal under all circumstances (except when the Delegate nation is also the Founder nation).

--The Modified Democratic States of Cogitation

Now here is where to problem lies. You say unless the person is the founder what if the Delegate give the founder permission to eject the people since the founder was removed.

Now here is where to problem lies. You say unless the person is the founder what if the Delegate give the founder permission to eject the people since the founder was removed.

It's still against the rules.

I don t undersand what rule we broke, the region is being recreated because you mods did not step in when it was greifed the first time (which is ok i donyt expect you to be everywhere) we just ook matters into our own hands to have the region recreated with the rightful founder and now my 2nd in command is deleted. If you want to delete someone delete me I gave the oredr he just followed it.

I want to know who reported this, I believe i have the right to know who my accuser is...i won't do anything to them...but i think it is my right to know that at the very least

I want to know who reported this, I believe i have the right to know who my accuser is...i won't do anything to them...but i think it is my right to know that at the very least

The mods won't disclose that.
If the accuser wishes, they can come forward. Otherwise, it is their right to remain anonymous.

so i get deleted for disbanding my own ancestoral homeland, i spent 3 months in the Imperial Order of Frith, it was my homeland, now i get deleted because some 3rd party just happens to come by when i was doing it, no one from that region reported because they either agreed or they were inactive...you can ask grazon yourself...

i still think i have the right to know my accuser, i assure you that no one from the IOOF reported this, they all agreed upon it, and i know that you will say "then why didn't they just move" firstly, several of those nations were inactive. secondly, we would have to wait months before they would be deleted by inactivity. Thirdly, we did it because it was our region. Fourthly, It was a matter of convenice to do so, we wanted to rebuild the IOOF so we had to destroy that one, our name is very important to us. Lastly, why is their some one in the IOOF now who has no previous affiliation with it.

i still think i have the right to know my accuser, i assure you that no one from the IOOF reported this, they all agreed upon it, and i know that you will say "then why didn't they just move" firstly, several of those nations were inactive. secondly, we would have to wait months before they would be deleted by inactivity. Thirdly, we did it because it was our region. Fourthly, It was a matter of convenice to do so, we wanted to rebuild the IOOF so we had to destroy that one, our name is very important to us. Lastly, why is their some one in the IOOF now who has no previous affiliation with it.

It doesn't matter that you think you have the right to know who your accuser is, because the moderators will not tell you.

i still think i have the right [...]

Rights are grossly overrated.

And largely non-existant.

i still think i have the right [...]

Rights are grossly overrated.

And largely non-existant.

Amen.

i still think i have the right [...]

Rights are grossly overrated.

And largely non-existant.

Amen.

Especially in a game where you sign them away in order to register...

(sorry for the pyramid)

Raem - rights (whether Bill of or otherwise) can be abrogated on private property if need be. NS is a private server.