NationStates Jolt Archive


I'm fairly sure this is flaming.......

Mouth of El Sabah Nur
01-02-2004, 09:13
This was posted on the North Pacific Civil HQ:

"14 minutes ago The Theoretical Probability of The twoslit experiment MOUTH of el sabah nur(who claims to be the incarnation of Christ):
Please desist from spamming these boards and the telegram boxes of members of this region. The members of this region are aware of the ejections of those two (which happened two weeks ago, and was discussed for up to two months before hand.) We are also aware of your efforts to spam and libel in both The South Pacific and The West Pacific. We are also aware that you deliberately deceived members of your own regions. A deliberate deception is called a lie, and that makes you a liar. Publishing a deliberately deceptive accusation is the definition of LIBEL. Others have started discussion of bringing legal action against you in a court of law in the United States. I recommend you CEASE AND DESIST from speaking altogether since you are no longer capable of speaking in a civilized manner. Apparently you have deceived yourself to such an extent that you are believing your own lies. I personally do not understand how anyone would marry you. In fact, I have no reason to believe that you are being honest about getting married.
perhaps someone can tell you that YOU AND YOUR MANY PUPPETS ARE NOT WELCOME HERE."

Yes, I've filed a report on the "Getting Help" page.

I've done nothing wrong to The twoslit experiment. I merely telegrammed nations endorsing him, and told them about his recent political ejections of two North Pacific nations.

I'm just playing the game. He's trying to make it personal....
The twoslit experiment
01-02-2004, 09:51
You have made it personal in two other regions before this. Suddenly everyone in the region, including myself and all of the people who don't like you have received the same telegram asking that WE remove our endorsements from me. How can I remove my endorsement from myself? Is this a script, or a silly person?

You have created a reputation for yourself. Everyone is becoming aware that you are unaware of LIBEL LAW.

You have done the same thing in The South Pacific and The West Pacific. Your posts in this forum demonstrate your personality.

I wish that you would be banned from playing this game, because you don't seem to be aware of the limits of free speech.

Perhaps you would prefer that people ignore certain words in your accusation.

The accusation:

"He recently ejected two nations, Nootroughsis and Domocolees, merely because they challenged him for the delegates seat."

The full discussion (lasting over two months for Nootroughsis, and over two weeks for Domocolees) can be found here: http://s2.invisionfree.com/The_North_Pacific/index.php?showforum=1

the phrase, "merely because they challenged him for the delegates seat" (sic) is inaccurate, misleading, therefore deceptive, and therefore LIBEL.

The discussion shows that they were ejected for deception and untrustworthiness, as Francos Spain should have been.

No one in this game has practiced LIBEL to such an extent as You, Savage Lands. You were deleted for flaming once before. You have been warned by the mods for spamming.

People have tried to explain to you the consequences of LIBEL, yet you persist.

It would please me greatly if you become the first player IP BANNED for LIBEL and perhaps several other reasons.
Mouth of El Sabah Nur
01-02-2004, 10:40
Twoslit, you throw that word "libel" around awfully freely. I'm not trying to be insulting, but for all the excuses you make up, you ejected those two nations because they had a lot of endorsements and were challenging you for the North Pacific delegacy. Therefore, my reporting of your actions to North Pacific nations does not constitute libel.

If I got IP banned for libel, there would have to be around 100 anti-Francos Spain nations IP banned as well.

Political telegrams are just apart of the game, man. Don't take it so personally, which you obviously do since you stooped to insulting me and my marriage on the North Pacific Civil HQ.
Catholic Europe
01-02-2004, 10:47
Well, as a report to the mods has been filed, I would say leave it and let them sort it out.
Mouth of El Sabah Nur
01-02-2004, 10:53
Well, as a report to the mods has been filed, I would say leave it and let them sort it out.

I agree, Catholic Europe. I just want to play the game, ya know? It's just rather irritating when people have to go and make it personal. Oh well, I'll retire to my corner......
Catholic Europe
01-02-2004, 10:56
I agree, Catholic Europe. I just want to play the game, ya know? It's just rather irritating when people have to go and make it personal. Oh well, I'll retire to my corner......

Good. I know it's annoying but if you get too mad and start flaming then you really will be in the wrong.
The twoslit experiment
01-02-2004, 13:58
Twoslit, you throw that word "libel" around awfully freely.

I have a dictionary. I recommend you find one also. You seem to have difficulty with English. When you publish deceptive, defamatory remarks against someone (and The twoslit experiment is a name owned by me that refers to me), then you are guilty of a criminal offence and subject to prosecution.

I'm not trying to be insulting, but for all the excuses you make up, you ejected those two nations because they had a lot of endorsements and were challenging you for the North Pacific delegacy. Therefore, my reporting of your actions to North Pacific nations does not constitute libel.

You are committing LIBEL again. I ejected those two for reasons previously mentioned. Claiming otherwise is deceitful and LIBELOUS.

Once again, I strongly suggest you CEASE AND DESIST. You are compounding your offences.

If I got IP banned for libel, there would have to be around 100 anti-Francos Spain nations IP banned as well.

The present case for LIBEL is directed against YOU. It is not appropriate to bring extraneous information involving others into the discussion.

Political telegrams are just apart of the game, man.

Political telegram do not include LIBEL. It is about time you learned that.

Don't take it so personally,

Anyone will take LIBEL personally, do not expect otherwise. That is why I have repeatedly asked you to CEASE AND DESIST.

which you obviously do since you stooped to insulting me and my marriage on the North Pacific Civil HQ.

The comment he is referring to:

I said: "I personally do not understand how anyone would marry you. In fact, I have no reason to believe that you are being honest about getting married."

I spoke very deliberately to express my lack of understanding and my concern about the reliability of anything you might say.

My lack of understanding cannot be taken as any reflection on you; therefore, I recommend again that you find a dictionary and this time look up "insult."

It behooves you to realize that when you begin practicing deceit, then everything you say will no longer be reliable.

IN CONCLUSION, I recommend that you

CEASE AND DESIST

until you have carefully considered the legaility of what you may say, and somehow learn how not to incriminate yourself.

Yours truly,
Two
Mouth of El Sabah Nur
01-02-2004, 14:04
Ok, so wondering aloud how anyone could be married to me isn't an insult? :?

Forget it, I'm not going to respond to your flame-baits....
Bistmath
01-02-2004, 17:41
i've heard this all before from you slr.
hang on i'll provide the linkage here.
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=112789
Mouth of El Sabah Nur
01-02-2004, 23:21
i've heard this all before from you slr.
hang on i'll provide the linkage here.
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=112789

Er, that thread has nothing to do with flaming, Bistmath. So how is it even the least bit similar? :roll:
Scolopendra
02-02-2004, 05:56
To both of you: get off your high horses.

El Sabah Nur, I really should dock you for telegram spamming.

Twoslit, you're generally a reasonable guy. Don't argue with someone who pretends to have a God complex--it'll hardly end well.

--Scolo
Scolopendra
02-02-2004, 05:58
Actually...

You were warned on 8 January 2004 for telegram spamming with puppets.

Goodbye.

--Scolo
Unfree People
02-02-2004, 06:10
This particular spamming with puppets was purly political, though. Unlike the last time when he called Lady Rebels "racist." Sirocco (I know you outrank Sir, but whatever) even told him it would be all right in this (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=120418) thread...
Zielony
02-02-2004, 06:12
Goodbye.

Goodbye=deat? :shock:
02-02-2004, 06:25
Actually...

You were warned on 8 January 2004 for telegram spamming with puppets.

Goodbye.

--Scolo

Yes, Sirocco told me my actions were legal, so I don't think the term "spamming" applies to what I did.

It doesn't seem quite fair to have one moderator rule that my actions were ok, then to have another moderator come along, overturn it, and then delete all my nations.

Another point I'd like to make is that people send political telegrams using their puppets all the time, so why did I get deleted for it?
Scolopendra
02-02-2004, 07:05
Yes, I was just wondering, is it legal to send out political telegrams, such as asking nations to unendorse a delegate, and presenting your case for why they should unendorse said delegate in the telegram?Is it okay to send out a few political telegrams? Sure.

Is it okay to spam an entire region? No.

This particular spamming with puppets was purly political, though.I don't have a problem with what he said, much in the same way I don't have a problem with the content of your usual region-advertisement spam. Spamming is spamming. He spammed, got warned, spammed again, got deleted.

The fact that even twoslit got this message--which would just be silly even if ex-ex-Savage Lands was just copy and pasting (but I for one favor the scriptkiddie theory)--simply says to me "This was not targeted by any means whatsoever." That's spam.

Oh, and just in case it wasn't well known, I'm not omniscient. I only know about these things when people complain. Then I check it and there ya go.
02-02-2004, 07:20
Yes, I was just wondering, is it legal to send out political telegrams, such as asking nations to unendorse a delegate, and presenting your case for why they should unendorse said delegate in the telegram?Is it okay to send out a few political telegrams? Sure.

Is it okay to spam an entire region? No.

This particular spamming with puppets was purly political, though.I don't have a problem with what he said, much in the same way I don't have a problem with the content of your usual region-advertisement spam. Spamming is spamming. He spammed, got warned, spammed again, got deleted.

The fact that even twoslit got this message--which would just be silly even if ex-ex-Savage Lands was just copy and pasting (but I for one favor the scriptkiddie theory)--simply says to me "This was not targeted by any means whatsoever." That's spam.

Oh, and just in case it wasn't well known, I'm not omniscient. I only know about these things when people complain. Then I check it and there ya go.

I did not telegram the entire region. I sent The Twoslit experiments endorsers one telegram each. I must have sent a telegam to The twoslit experiment on accident, as it was late at night when I did it and I was getting rather hazy.

I didn't use a script, either. I honestly don't even know what a script really is.

I just find it odd that scores of people mass telegram Francos Spains endorsers and no one has EVER recieved any type of warning for it, yet most of my nations get deleted if I do it to a fairly popular NationStates player.
Dettibok
02-02-2004, 15:21
lols... same arguements.

oops. *gets off her horse* at least i think that was aimed at me.
anyways. same stuff diff thread.
Mouth of El Sabah Nur
03-02-2004, 04:11
lols... same arguements.

oops. *gets off her horse* at least i think that was aimed at me.
anyways. same stuff diff thread.

Scolopendras remark was clearly not aimed at you.

You should really read the entire thread before you post, Dettibok. It helps to really have a grasp on the entire situation before you post, that way your posts are more constructive.
Bistmath
03-02-2004, 12:10
actually darling it was me.

my fiancee had logged in as that nation after i had. i hit the forum link from somewhere else and was accidentally tossed in as him.

believe me, darling i think i have the mark on you.
Mouth of El Sabah Nur
03-02-2004, 16:26
actually darling it was me.

my fiancee had logged in as that nation after i had. i hit the forum link from somewhere else and was accidentally tossed in as him.

Ahh ok. Well I had no way of knowing it was you who was logged in under Dettibok. Anyway, I apologize to your fiance then. Still, I think it's pretty obvious that Scolopendra was referring to The twoslit experiment and I.

believe me, darling i think i have the mark on you.

Trust me, I know what you're doing. You're upset over the incident between Ladyrebels and myself and now you're out for revenge. Your fiance has already admitted to me in a telegram that he wants to see me deleted.

Well since this is getting off topic, perhaps one of the moderators could lock it?
Bistmath
04-02-2004, 16:10
i'm not out for revenge. i think it's over. i'm just watching to see where the rules land. actually my post had nothing to do with violence at all. got the mark on you has more to do with your psychology.

detti has a great sense of morality. it makes him grumpy to see people committing acts in his home. so he would like to see you removed from the game for what you have done. *shrugs*