Flamed by telegram, is this enough?
The nation, by the name, of "The United Socialist States of Nodea Rudav" has also flamed against me due to the thread that Daniki flamed against me. I guess this is probably without merit as well. This was done via telegram.
Wow... I was under the impression that Nodea Rudav was a conservative, God-fearing nation. He's certainly come out against flaming numerous times.
Either I was wrong or someone is being ethically inconsistent.
Whatever the case, intentional flaming is against the rules; flaming by telegram strikes me as particularly pointless. Either way, remember that you can always add him to your ignore list.
Just to make things easier for all to understand, here is a copy of the telegram:
From Message
The United Socialist States of Nodea Rudav
Received: 14 hours ago Turn ye sights from the Word ye hear, Fool! Teaching thy daughter Lesbinism, even allowing, is a Sin! Ye are not fit to allow such farthership! Repent of thy sins against God Almighty, for Five Times He has attempted to speak to ye!
God has not forgotten you, so why have ye forgotten God Almighty?
Now you can see for yourself the type of person really behind the nation
Goobergunchia
18-01-2004, 00:59
Getting help page, and save the telegram until a mod sees it.
Looks like standard RP to me. If someone is RPing a religious nation, how is this innappropriate (barring the possible IC/OOC incompatibility)? The worst it does it call you a fool and says that you've sinned/turned from God. Sorry, that in no possible way seems to be flaming to me. If the guy continues, then it's harrassment, but until then this certainly does seem to be "without merit." I'd hope that we're not under such censorship...
Neutered Sputniks
18-01-2004, 09:28
Um...that's not exactly a flame. Religious zealot maybe, but not a flamer.
Case closed.