NationStates Jolt Archive


Link to site that contains porn link

Ryanania
04-01-2004, 10:29
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=111419
Neutered Sputniks
04-01-2004, 10:52
Deat.
04-01-2004, 10:58
Wallaceland was just deleted by mistake.

the link posted by him ( http://jdigital.poyoko.org/olsen.php ) contains no porn.

the link posted by Almighty Sephiroth ( http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view.php?id=142892 ) does contain a porn link.

please bring Wallaceland back, and take whatever action is needed on Almighty Sephiroth.
04-01-2004, 11:05
anyone working to fix the mistake???
Liverpool England
04-01-2004, 11:06
I've notified Neut on IRC.
04-01-2004, 11:10
I've notified Neut on IRC.
thanx
Neutered Sputniks
04-01-2004, 11:14
Wallaceland was inciting things in that thread that lead to his deletion, not just the link itself. He'd already been warned previously tonight concerning his forum etiquette.

The thread in question has been deleted, and as I believe Almighty Sephiroth to have posted the link without realizing the porn link's existance, no action has been taken against Almighty Sephiroth.
04-01-2004, 11:17
yes you are correct, after he was warned in the Russo-Jewish joke thread, the remarks stopped.

Wallaceland was posting something that contained no porn, or porn links, in the Olsen twins thread.

Wallaceland has never posted anything that related to porn in his posts.
Neutered Sputniks
04-01-2004, 11:19
Using a puppet to argue your case is hardly a wise move.

You did indeed post material that was porn related. Not only that, your remarks were hardly unrelated to porn.
04-01-2004, 11:24
the material incited by Wallaceland is no more offensive (actually less) than what is being incited in the following threads.

http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=111439
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=111428
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=111438

what he was posting is legal in his state (one of the most conservative), so how does that make it offensive to the General Fourm.

the description of the General Forum is "For discussion and debate about anything." He was not discussing porn, he was discussing the Olsen Twins.
04-01-2004, 11:26
You did indeed post material that was porn related. Not only that, your remarks were hardly unrelated to porn.
How does a countdown to how long before the Olsen twins turn 18 relate to porn?
Neutered Sputniks
04-01-2004, 11:26
In a pornographic manner.


Wanna keep arguing like he's a different person? Or do you wanna own up to ownership?
04-01-2004, 11:31
In a pornographic manner.


Wanna keep arguing like he's a different person? Or do you wanna own up to ownership?
yeah its me (Wallaceland) trying to make a point, but this is my room mate's country.

I did not recieve a warning in that thread stating that my remarks were of a "pornographic manner" and they were not intended to be.

I thought that if someone was intrested to watch the video in the link posted by Almighty Sephiroth, then they would be intrested in the link I posted.

I did not intend for it to have a pornographic nature to it, and was never told by a game mod that it did. If I would have been told, I would have stopped posing there immedately
Neutered Sputniks
04-01-2004, 11:32
So your comments concerning your link were of a completely non-sexual manner?
04-01-2004, 11:35
So your comments concerning your link were of a completely non-sexual manner?
I am not saying that my comments were not of a non-sexual manner, but there is discussion in the General Forum of sexual subjects commonly, so I did not feel that my remarks would result in deleation of my country.

If I had been told by a game mod that my remarks were unacceptabe, i would have stopped right then.
Neutered Sputniks
04-01-2004, 11:37
I had already warned you about your forum etiquette tonight.
04-01-2004, 11:41
I had already warned you about your forum etiquette tonight.
yes you had. there were no more "jewspeak" remarks after you had done so.

I was joking with, I cannot remember whom, and the thread is deleated now so I cannot see whom, about the Olsen twins. it was a 2 way conversation, i was just going along with it. If i thought it would have gotten me deleated, i would not have done so.
Neutered Sputniks
04-01-2004, 11:44
You had been warned to watch your forum etiquette - not just to quit using the term "jewspeak" in a derogatory manner.
04-01-2004, 11:46
You had been warned to watch your forum etiquette - not just to quit using the term "jewspeak" in a derogatory manner.
you're right. but i did not feel that my remarks would have resulted in deleation because of the content in the General Forum like
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=111439
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=111428
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=111438
04-01-2004, 12:20
so you are just going to ignore my points, and will not admit that you made a mistake by deleting the wrong nation. after warning me tonight, you were looking for a reason to boot me, and when someone posted a thread with this subject in this forum, you did not check out which link had a porn link, you just saw I had a link, did not check it, and deleated me.

fess up and admit that you made a mistake.
Neutered Sputniks
04-01-2004, 12:23
I did check out the link.

Something about that page having a link to check the legal age of consent where ever you are caught my eye. As did the fac that the countdown was not till the twins were 18, but till the twins were of the legal age of consent.


This, along with the nature of your posts, after having already been warned to watch yourself, was too much. End of story.
04-01-2004, 12:30
I did check out the link.

Something about that page having a link to check the legal age of consent where ever you are caught my eye. As did the fac that the countdown was not till the twins were 18, but till the twins were of the legal age of consent.


This, along with the nature of your posts, after having already been warned to watch yourself, was too much. End of story.

the link in http://jdigital.pyoko.org/olsen.php contained a link that had nothing but text relating to the Legal Age of Consent Laws in differant countries and states.

my text was no more offensive than the conversations in the following threads:
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=111439
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=111428
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=111438

NationStates: "Censorship and Hypricacy at its finest"
Neutered Sputniks
04-01-2004, 12:42
Except that you'd already been warned earlier this evening, and your comments in the thread were most definately as innocent as you'd make them out to be.
04-01-2004, 12:55
Except that you'd already been warned earlier this evening, and your comments in the thread were most definately as innocent as you'd make them out to be.
okay, i was talking about two 17 year old girls (and I now know the age of consent in my state is 16) so whats the big deal?

you made a mistake, fess up to it and bring me back
Neutered Sputniks
04-01-2004, 12:57
And we have rules...


NO.
04-01-2004, 13:01
all i am asking for is a reprive here. I made a mistake, you made a mistake. So instead of each of us trying to justify to each other why the other is wrong, just give me a second chance.

you have never had any trouble out of me before. Tonight was just a misunderstanding. Please see what happened tonight for what it is, a mistake by myself and I now know what the limits of the Gen. Forum are.
TJHairball
04-01-2004, 14:35
Well, you've now completely blown the whole "asking for forgiveness and a second chance" schtick... :roll: