NationStates Jolt Archive

:roll:


HOW IS A PROPOSAL ABOUT KILLING THE RICH. IT IS F***ING SERIOUS! THAT WAS MY SECOND NATION TO BE KICKED OUT. AND IT'S A LOAD OF CRAP. I FEEL WE DO NEED TO KILL THE RICH. SO I WAS KICKED OUT FOR MY OPINION OF HARDCORE COMMUNISM. JEEZ.

Well, I'm sure that's going to make the mods more receptive :?

See that little CAPS lock button? Push it once.

See that little CAPS lock button? Push it once.

Now, now, Bas. Let the infant have his fun. He's overjoyed at the realisation that there is a capslock button to begin with, perhaps he has not realised it can be pressed more then once.

See that little CAPS lock button? Push it once.

Now, now, Bas. Let the infant have his fun. He's overjoyed at the realisation that there is a capslock button to begin with, perhaps he has not realised it can be pressed more then once.

LMAO!!!

Your opinion of hardcore communism (which is an opinion bearing little or no resemblance to the real tenets of communism or any leftist political ideology) was couched as a Moral Decency proposal. It clearly is not one, which means it was in the wrong category. That was the third proposal you had submitted in violation of the rules, so out you go.

I might add that if this was your second nation ejected from the UN, I would've thought that you might have learned from your mistakes with the first one.

Any questions?

fine. i'm sorry i was just mad. argh, i still am.

isn't killing people restricting civil liberties in the name of moral decency? in my opinion having way to many rich people isn't morally decent. i felt it fit in with that more then it did with social inequality.

isn't killing people restricting civil liberties in the name of moral decency? in my opinion having way to many rich people isn't morally decent. i felt it fit in with that more then it did with social inequality.
It's restricting civil liberties, yes, but not really "in the name of moral decency". Particularly since you described the resolution yourself as "my view of hardcore communism", then it needed to be a Social Justice proposal. Social-ism, social justice, it all starts to fit together.

Bah. It's people like you, Patar, that are what's wrong with the world. Too lazy to make yourself rich.

You sicken me.

Roania: You're not helping.

--The Modified Democratic States of Cogitation

If the proposal was worded more politically correct, would it have had the chance to make it to a UN vote? There's many more tactful ways of addressing the issue than just to say "kill all the rich people."

Just because a proposal doesn't make it to the UN doesn't mean the members of the UN are "babies." It just means we don't tolerate properly proposed proposals (try saying that five times fast).

:lol:

i know i know i'm sorry for being all pissed off before. the un isn't full of babies or anything like that. i was just cheesed off that's all.

btw, I am patar :)

If the proposal was worded more politically correct, would it have had the chance to make it to a UN vote?
Possibly, but that's a blanket statement to make. It was deleted for being in the wrong category and, if posted in the correct category, would then be assessed for being offensive or whatever. Without a copy of the proposal handy, I can't comment as to whether or not it would've made it.

Roania: You're not helping.

--The Modified Democratic States of Cogitation

Sorry. :oops:

Anyway, I'd be surprised if it would get voted on anyway, even if it does reach the floor.