Stephistan v. the "Whips, Chains, and Leather, oh my!&q
This issue is now public fodder.
Not to long ago, an associate received a severe admonishment from Stephistan regarding a harmless ball-gag post. This is not the only bit of authoritarian thuggery this mama has carried out. Her levels of hippocrisy are mind-boggling. And here she moderates NationStates - poisong it for all.
Good for the game ? Not for me to decide. But I care a whole lot less.
Barry, His Excellency's janitor
Liverpool England
23-11-2003, 10:51
OK, first off, MODALERT to Moderation.
Secondly, in my opinion, Stphie's done a great job. She's helped out new players, and tolerated n00bs. Could you please name the example in particular, IE link to thread?
______________________________________________
Greater Imperial Kingdom of Liverpool England,
non moderator
The Getting Help Page (http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/page=help), Tech FAQ (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=81296), The Game FAQ (http://www.nationstates.net/pages/faq.html), View These Great Threads sticky (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=29774) and The Concept of good RP/The Infamous IGNORE (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=79117)
The Most Glorious Hack
23-11-2003, 11:34
I suppose the fact that Stephistan has nothing to do with issue editing is irrelevent too, huh? :roll:
Alternatively, if you don't want to make the evidence "public domain", then TG someone (such as me) with what information you have and I'll have a look into it. Before anyone screams "bias", I can safely say that this business is new to me entirely so I'm not going to be walking in with any pre-conceived ideas.
Stephistan is one of the best mods out there in my opinion :D
I agree with Myrth, Stephistan is a great mod, and a nice player. Can we get some evidence on this accusation?
Stephistan
23-11-2003, 21:11
I must admit.. even I am unaware of exactly what the accusation is? *Shrug* :?
Stephanie
Forum Mod
Bah, I've worked with Steph before (in RP University). Great player, great mod.
Unless there are actually evidence as said, don't expect people to believe you.
steph si 2taly awsum lolz
This issue is now public fodder.
Not to long ago, an associate received a severe admonishment from Stephistan regarding a harmless ball-gag post. This is not the only bit of authoritarian thuggery this mama has carried out. Her levels of hippocrisy are mind-boggling. And here she moderates NationStates - poisong it for all.
Good for the game ? Not for me to decide. But I care a whole lot less.
Barry, His Excellency's janitor
Okay.
--Felix.
Cogitation
24-11-2003, 03:11
I must admit.. even I am unaware of exactly what the accusation is? *Shrug* :?
If I'm reading the initial post correctly, you're being accused of being a hypocrite. Specifically, admonishing someone for making a post about ball gags while we mods simultaneously allow a daily issue about BDSM to circulate among nations.
Of course, I'm still waiting for a link to the topic where this admonishing allegedly took place.
--The Modified Democratic States of Cogitation
"Think about it for a moment."
This issue is now public fodder.
Not to long ago, an associate received a severe admonishment from Stephistan regarding a harmless ball-gag post. This is not the only bit of authoritarian thuggery this mama has carried out. Her levels of hippocrisy are mind-boggling. And here she moderates NationStates - poisong it for all.
Good for the game ? Not for me to decide. But I care a whole lot less.
Barry, His Excellency's janitor
Okay.
--Felix.
UH OH MODALERT SPAM
The True Domination
24-11-2003, 03:40
I suppose the fact that Stephistan has nothing to do with issue editing is irrelevent too, huh? :roll:
What's with all the "Cog/Steph are incompetent because of [insert irrellevant argument]" threads lately?
I suppose the fact that Stephistan has nothing to do with issue editing is irrelevent too, huh? :roll:
What's with all the "Cog/Steph are incompetent because of [insert irrellevant argument]" threads lately?
General "hatred of those in positions of authority" syndrome, I guess. Possibly coupled with a sort of Marlon Brando-esque "I coulda been a moderata".
The SLAGLands
24-11-2003, 06:14
steph si 2taly awsum lolz
Knock it off.
The True Domination
24-11-2003, 06:20
I suppose the fact that Stephistan has nothing to do with issue editing is irrelevent too, huh? :roll:
What's with all the "Cog/Steph are incompetent because of [insert irrellevant argument]" threads lately?
General "hatred of those in positions of authority" syndrome, I guess. Possibly coupled with a sort of Marlon Brando-esque "I coulda been a moderata".
Oh well. At least they're leaving the rest of youse alone for a while. I wonder who it'll be next week. I know. Let's have a bash the mod day once a week. We'll all complain about a particular, predetermined mod for that day, and love each other the rest of the time. We can call it bash-a-mod-day. Who wants to go first? How about you Eno. Or Hack. I haven't seen a good old fashioned slash Hack for quite a while. They're usually good for a chuckle or 3.
steph si 2taly awsum lolz
Knock it off.
I'm just showing my support for the mods!!!
The Most Glorious Hack
24-11-2003, 07:46
I haven't seen a good old fashioned slash Hack for quite a while. They're usually good for a chuckle or 3.
There was one a week or two ago. :? "Do The Mod Support Racist Threads" or something like that.
I haven't seen a good old fashioned slash Hack for quite a while. They're usually good for a chuckle or 3.
There was one a week or two ago. :? "Do The Mod Support Racist Threads" or something like that.
Well yes, but that was in relation to something you did before you were a mod. I got bashed a fair bit after the National Stalinist business, since a lot of big regions needed founders appointed - and doing so "on the fly" inadvertently weighed into long-running political stoushes.
Let's face it, most of the mods are so danged uncontroversial that the only way to bash them is via irrelevant arguments.
[quote="Liverpool England"]OK, first off, MODALERT to Moderation.
Secondly, in my opinion, Stphie's done a great job. She's helped out new players, and tolerated n00bs. Could you please name the example in particular, IE link to thread?[quote]
'K
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1456747#1456747
This was followed by a torrent of "we must protect the children" telegram rhetoric and associated threats to nullify my nation. Telegrams, of course, don't get archived without conscious user intent.
I'm sure that their are others that have been likewise threatened - their have been other threads here similarly bullied by Ms. Concerned Citizen.
Sure leaves me feeling sour about what's supposed to be an "open" intellectual exercise. "Open" the way way that Stalin or Pol Pot would have liked.
$Bill
I must admit.. even I am unaware of exactly what the accusation is? *Shrug* :?
Stephanie
Forum Mod
Amongst other things, your Holiness, what stands out predominantly is your telegram bombing of our entire region labelling our then delegate a pedophile for daring to oppose one of your UN proposals. The fact that he had very valid reasons for opposing what was a vacuous and poorly worded proposal meant nothing to you. You proceeded and slurred him as a pedophile and genuinely scared him - a simple college kid who, with the insane everyday escalations of trivia to the point of trauma that is common in the US - you could have permanently scarred. But of course, "we must protect the children, damn the cost".
You're a thoughtless pig Steph. And a detriment to the game.
So what's the next ThoughtCrime going to be ?
Waiting with baited breath,
Barry, His Excellency's janitor
Stephistan
24-11-2003, 14:25
I must admit.. even I am unaware of exactly what the accusation is? *Shrug* :?
Stephanie
Forum Mod
Amongst other things, your Holiness, what stands out predominantly is your telegram bombing of our entire region labelling our then delegate a pedophile for daring to oppose one of your UN proposals. The fact that he had very valid reasons for opposing what was a vacuous and poorly worded proposal meant nothing to you. You proceeded and slurred him as a pedophile and genuinely scared him - a simple college kid who, with the insane everyday escalations of trivia to the point of trauma that is common in the US - you could have permanently scarred. But of course, "we must protect the children, damn the cost".
You're a thoughtless pig Steph. And a detriment to the game.
So what's the next ThoughtCrime going to be ?
Waiting with baited breath,
Barry, His Excellency's janitor
Oh yes, as any mod can check.. this was when I proposed my "Child Protection Act" which was passed in the UN, long before I became a moderator. I hardly call telegramming him and saying that I couldn't understand his arguments as;
your telegram bombing of our entire region labelling our then delegate a pedophile
I did send a few telegrams at the time acting as regional delegate of my region (I wasn't a mod yet) to the people of said region asking them if they were aware that your delegate thought it was ok to have sex with 7 year old children.
As for the ball-gag post I deleted back when I first became a moderator.. well, if memory serves me correct, which I believe it does.. the poster had posted a picture of a woman tied up with a ball-gag in her mouth. Very classy boys! It depicted violence against women. It was inappropriate and I would delete it again if it were to show up.
Now, why on earth it took you over three months to complain about said actions is quite beyond me. I will say this much. I stand by the decision I made and had any moderator seen the pic it would of been deleted from the site.
As for your flaming of me and name calling, I suggest you stop it. Flaming any one is against the rules and uncalled for. Flaming a mod is just stupid!
Stephanie
Forum Mod
Cogitation
24-11-2003, 19:27
As for the ball-gag post I deleted back when I first became a moderator.. well, if memory serves me correct, which I believe it does.. the poster had posted a picture of a woman tied up with a ball-gag in her mouth.
I just want to clarify this point: Images are held to far tighter restrictions than text.
I originally, thought that this was a complaint about a text description of ball gags being removed. I would consider a text description of ball gags to be maybe, I repeat, "maybe" acceptable, but I'd have to confer with other mods about it.
Images of adult toys actually being used or worn are beyond what is acceptable for NationStates.net.
"Think about it for a moment."
--The Modified Democratic States of Cogitation
NationStates Forum Moderator
While I may have personal reasons for disliking Stephistan, all I've seen from this antimod crowd have been chaotic, disorganized, meaningless attacks. I mean... come on people. She once sent a telegram to your delegate? She deleted a post containing the image of a woman wearing a ball gag? If that's the best you can do, then I suggest you move on to a more controversial mod.
At least Neut's haters could rally around threads he'd lock.
Goobergunchia
24-11-2003, 19:58
I must admit.. even I am unaware of exactly what the accusation is? *Shrug* :?
Stephanie
Forum Mod
Amongst other things, your Holiness, what stands out predominantly is your telegram bombing of our entire region labelling our then delegate a pedophile for daring to oppose one of your UN proposals. The fact that he had very valid reasons for opposing what was a vacuous and poorly worded proposal meant nothing to you. You proceeded and slurred him as a pedophile and genuinely scared him - a simple college kid who, with the insane everyday escalations of trivia to the point of trauma that is common in the US - you could have permanently scarred. But of course, "we must protect the children, damn the cost".
You're a thoughtless pig Steph. And a detriment to the game.
So what's the next ThoughtCrime going to be ?
Waiting with baited breath,
Barry, His Excellency's janitor
Stephistan was one of the most vocal opponents of my "Outlaw Pedophilia" resolution. Furthermore, "Child Protection Act" came to a vote well before Steph was made a mod:
CPA passed - 8/2
Steph modified - 8/31
Stephistan
25-11-2003, 00:09
I must admit.. even I am unaware of exactly what the accusation is? *Shrug* :?
Stephanie
Forum Mod
Amongst other things, your Holiness, what stands out predominantly is your telegram bombing of our entire region labelling our then delegate a pedophile for daring to oppose one of your UN proposals. The fact that he had very valid reasons for opposing what was a vacuous and poorly worded proposal meant nothing to you. You proceeded and slurred him as a pedophile and genuinely scared him - a simple college kid who, with the insane everyday escalations of trivia to the point of trauma that is common in the US - you could have permanently scarred. But of course, "we must protect the children, damn the cost".
You're a thoughtless pig Steph. And a detriment to the game.
So what's the next ThoughtCrime going to be ?
Waiting with baited breath,
Barry, His Excellency's janitor
Stephistan was one of the most vocal opponents of my "Outlaw Pedophilia" resolution. Furthermore, "Child Protection Act" came to a vote well before Steph was made a mod:
CPA passed - 8/2
Steph modified - 8/31
Well, I agreed with it in spirit Goobergunchia, I just found it to vauge if I recall correctly. Only because you had forgot to state what constituted a minor. I remember that.. The whole argument against the proposal was to define what a "minor" was. Silly how we recall stuff huh? Especially when you get old like me.. ;)
Goobergunchia
25-11-2003, 00:23
Goobergunchia
25-11-2003, 00:24
<---- doesn't really remember
IIRC, part of the argument was that I didn't provide a provision regarding non-minors being sexually assaulted.
'Twas a long time ago (in NS terms), anyway....
The Basenji
25-11-2003, 01:02
Frrrpistan, your a jackass on so many levels. Calling someone a "Thoughtless pig", wheter they are a mod or not, is uncalled for. Stop making personal attacks. Try a more intelligent manner of arguing, and more people will listen.
~The Barkless Land of The Basenji~
Non-Moderator
Helping the good people of NS anyway he can.
The Getting Help Page (http://www.nationstates.net/cgi-bin/index.cgi/page=help), Tech FAQ (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=81296), Role-playing FAQ (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=29774), and The Game FAQ (http://www.nationstates.net/pages/faq.html)
http://a9.cpimg.com/image/25/D7/21759269-e5f1-00300030-.jpg
Flaming any one is against the rules and uncalled for.
Frrrpistan, your a jackass on so many levels.
Cogitation
25-11-2003, 03:16
Frrrpistan, your a jackass on so many levels.... Stop making personal attacks.
You might want to follow you own advice.
"Think about it for a moment."
--The Democratic States of Cogitation
The Basenji
25-11-2003, 03:19
I know what I said was flame. I was angry at the time, I'm sorry about that.
Kholdstare
25-11-2003, 03:50
This is not the only bit of authoritarian thuggery this mama has carried out.
:lol: That quote is priceless, I love it. :lol:
Zeppistan
25-11-2003, 04:21
Gosh.... this thread just reminds me.... twenty years ago my sister forgot to put the top back on the tube of toothpaste... and it made a mess of my counter.....
Well NOW I'M PISSED!! I'm gonna go call her and give her a piece of my mind....
lol.
-Z-
Neutered Sputniks
25-11-2003, 04:25
lol
Locked for the flamebait and reasons I've posted in the other thread attacking Stephistan.