NationStates Jolt Archive


A question about foundership.....

02-11-2003, 21:09
---Post deleted by NationStates Moderators---
Goobergunchia
02-11-2003, 21:12
It's not going to happen. Founders cannot be changed.

Goobergunchia
Non-Moderator
Kandarin
02-11-2003, 21:17
Why would you want to change it?
02-11-2003, 21:19
Yeah, why change it, it would still be YOU as founder, so what's the point?
02-11-2003, 21:21
---Post deleted by NationStates Moderators---
Kandarin
02-11-2003, 21:21
You retain Founder powers over Pacific Army regardless of what region you're in. So you can go wherever you want.
02-11-2003, 21:22
Why would you want to change it?

It would free up this nation to conduct counter-invasions. Also it would free this nation up to become the delegate of the Pacific in the post-Francos Spain era...

Once Francos is gone, what's the point of having the Pacific Army anyway?
Draztonia
02-11-2003, 21:28
keeping francos gone?
Cogitation
02-11-2003, 21:30
You retain Founder powers over Pacific Army regardless of what region you're in. So you can go wherever you want.

Alternatively, you could switch UN status to your puppet.

--The Modified Democratic States of Cogitation
02-11-2003, 22:08
---Post deleted by NationStates Moderators---
Qaaolchoura
02-11-2003, 22:24
Qaaolchoura
02-11-2003, 22:26
It's not going to happen. Founders cannot be changed.

Goobergunchia
Non-Moderator
They can, but they will not.
I've seen it done twice.

Once, temporarily when Danya went on extented vacation(and then back), and once when following the squabble over Axis, Neut made himself founder to maintain firm control over it.
Qaaolchoura
02-11-2003, 22:26
It's not going to happen. Founders cannot be changed.

Goobergunchia
Non-Moderator
They can, but they will not.
I've seen it done twice.

Once, temporarily when Danya went on extented vacation(and then back), and once when following the squabble over Axis, Neut made himself founder to maintain firm control over it.
02-11-2003, 23:20
and once when following the squabble over Axis, Neut made himself founder to maintain firm control over it.

Whatever happens never allow foundership to a nation already present in Axis. I would prefer this region a home to a single nation and mod founder than the Most High Schronce and puppets in this place. Just for security I will stuff the regions arse with a puppet.
Qaaolchoura
03-11-2003, 00:32
Whatever happens never allow foundership to a nation already present in Axis. I would prefer this region a home to a single nation and mod founder than the Most High Schronce and puppets in this place. Just for security I will stuff the regions arse with a puppet.
Why the vehmence about Axis? :?

I'm not quite clear, what the worry is.

As long as Neut is modding, I assume that he will control Axis, and then I assume that it passes to aother mod or their puppet.
The Most Glorious Hack
03-11-2003, 06:10
once when following the squabble over Axis, Neut made himself founder to maintain firm control over it.

Oh, that sort of thing happens. There have been a few times when I've kicked crashers out of a region and made myself or one of my puppets temporary Founder to keep the region open until the natives return. However, it's always temporary, and I make that clear.

Of course, the crashers often return to make snide comments or flame... :roll:

...which points out their non-UN nations for annihilation :twisted:
03-11-2003, 06:36
---Post deleted by NationStates Moderators---
04-11-2003, 00:43
---Post deleted by NationStates Moderators---
04-11-2003, 05:10
---Post deleted by NationStates Moderators---
04-11-2003, 05:10
---Post deleted by NationStates Moderators---
Kandarin
04-11-2003, 05:15
know the history of a reigon that existed before the founder position was around. What the soon to be founder fo the region did was when the founder position was invented, he emailed the admins. He gained supporters and they all emailed the admins to ask that he become founder of the region so it would be protected against invasions and have an absolute ruler to preside over the region.

So basically it is possible with special intervention by the moderators but you better have a good reason and a good record. The person I know who did it before did it because of a region crashing before founders existed. I can't think of a reason better than that so good luck. If you have any questions just post here or telegram me.

The Savage Lands is already Founder. He is asking for the position to be transferred to a puppet.
04-11-2003, 08:13
once when following the squabble over Axis, Neut made himself founder to maintain firm control over it.

Oh, that sort of thing happens. There have been a few times when I've kicked crashers out of a region and made myself or one of my puppets temporary Founder to keep the region open until the natives return. However, it's always temporary, and I make that clear.

Of course, the crashers often return to make snide comments or flame... :roll:

...which points out their non-UN nations for annihilation :twisted:

As an alternative you could just contact me. I would be glad to defend these regions, and I would bring friends.
Ackbar
04-11-2003, 13:51
know the history of a reigon that existed before the founder position was around. What the soon to be founder fo the region did was when the founder position was invented, he emailed the admins. He gained supporters and they all emailed the admins to ask that he become founder of the region so it would be protected against invasions and have an absolute ruler to preside over the region.

So basically it is possible with special intervention by the moderators but you better have a good reason and a good record. The person I know who did it before did it because of a region crashing before founders existed. I can't think of a reason better than that so good luck. If you have any questions just post here or telegram me.

The Savage Lands is already Founder. He is asking for the position to be transferred to a puppet.

To me this is even more a reason for no mod intervention. It's isn't being asked because the founder is dead, or anything. It is being asked because the nation in question has grown finicky (no offence) and decided another nation of theirs might make a good founder. No reason for mod intervention as I see it.

Again, just my O.
The Most Glorious Hack
04-11-2003, 14:35
To me this is even more a reason for no mod intervention. It's isn't being asked because the founder is dead, or anything. It is being asked because the nation in question has grown finicky (no offence) and decided another nation of theirs might make a good founder. No reason for mod intervention as I see it.

Yeah. Pretty much.
05-11-2003, 00:33
---Post deleted by NationStates Moderators---