Siggi
27-10-2003, 17:46
With all due respect to what has been stated, I have a rather hard time swallowing this. We wake up and believe that the chances of being allowed to take avantage of this type of glitch are slim to none. We later in the day hear that we should play it. Still later, after many may have logged off, a decision is made to possibly strip the UN credentials of the "invaders". Then a decision is made again within an hour of the update to let it play.
I understand differences of opinion among those in control of the game, and the availablity of some voices can not always be counted on. In those cases, it is my belief that you must back the decision of those you trusted to make decsions in your absence. This back and forth pulling of the strings serves no purpose except to infuriate those who put their trust in your decisions. In the end, we find ourselves here. Can anyone in moderation truly be proud of what has happened in the past 24 hours on either side of the fence?
I understand differences of opinion among those in control of the game, and the availablity of some voices can not always be counted on. In those cases, it is my belief that you must back the decision of those you trusted to make decsions in your absence. This back and forth pulling of the strings serves no purpose except to infuriate those who put their trust in your decisions. In the end, we find ourselves here. Can anyone in moderation truly be proud of what has happened in the past 24 hours on either side of the fence?