NationStates Jolt Archive

From looking at things I see that you seem to have a personal Issue with beeks.

Yes i am his friend, but do my best to be (pardon the pun) nuetral..

Sorry to bother you.

Jim

PS. probably should have phrased it as a question. "do you have a personal problem with beeks?"

Trying to avoid deletion myself.

The only issue that I have with Beeks is that he has refused to heed warnings, and has insulted the Mods and our intelligence by attempting to mislead us and the rest of the forum-goers.

It only appears personal because Beeks wants it to appear that way. If it's personal, then just maybe he shouldnt have been deleted, right? Which is exactly why he's attempting to make out that it is personal, when in fact he has repeatedly broken the rules, and continued to do so even after a forum ban and having had a nation deleted.

Let me assure you, it is not a personal thing between neut and Beeker. We have discussed this at length with the entire mod team, and come to a consensus. It is our habit to allow the original moderator that first handled the situation to stay with it as it evoloves. This is so the most informed person is handling the situation. In the case of Beeker, Neut is the most informed on the situation, therefore he handles most of the relevant issues that come up. Think of us as case workers if you will, but be assured that all the mods are involoved in the process, and we do not allow each other's personal feelings for people to bleed into moderation issues. It is a system of peer-review, and of course, superior-review from [Violet].

Thanx.

Some could see this as a bias involving nuet. As has been pointed out to me..

I try to bother y'all as little as I can. The rules are posted.

Some of what I have posted could be considered flame, troll, (and mostly) spam. I do tank you for your time

http://www.angelfire.com/tx6/jimp/images/jim1004a.jpg
Ave Satanis!
Rege Satanis!
Hail Satan!

Self centred arrogance!
Big Jim P!

Let me assure you, it is not a personal thing between neut and Beeker. We have discussed this at length with the entire mod team, and come to a consensus. It is our habit to allow the original moderator that first handled the situation to stay with it as it evoloves. This is so the most informed person is handling the situation. In the case of Beeker, Neut is the most informed on the situation, therefore he handles most of the relevant issues that come up. Think of us as case workers if you will, but be assured that all the mods are involoved in the process, and we do not allow each other's personal feelings for people to bleed into moderation issues. It is a system of peer-review, and of course, superior-review from [Violet].

After reading many posts by "Beeker" in the moderation forum, one could reasonably assert that his use of manipulation, although clumsy at times, would normally be indicative of a type of psychosis. He's a fascinating character, obviously a highly intelligent type A personality. It seems to be a form of narcisim that drives him to persue these endless debates about the rights and wrongs of forum moderation.

I also detect a certain reservation from the moderation team to act decisively in situations such as these - perhaps due to the psycological phenomenom known as MMR - middle management rage. It is a difficult situation to be ruled by "boss" [Violet] and to also have to answer to the collective voice of "the game."

If he was truely a "Type A" personallity, he wouldn't spend so much time in front of a computer.

Oops, that one was a bit too self descriptive.

From looking at things I see that you seem to have a personal Issue with beeks.

Yes i am his friend, but do my best to be (pardon the pun) nuetral..

Sorry to bother you.

Jim

PS. probably should have phrased it as a question. "do you have a personal problem with beeks?"

Trying to avoid deletion myself.

Nuet may have a person problem with Beeks, no idea.

But if you were to look at all the the other threads that have been started by Beeks thus far claiming only bias- many, many others seem to believe it is not just a thing percieved by the one mod.

It alos seems that his apology for breaking the rules should account for the fact that he actually did, ahem, break the rules.

As to your question. If he did have a bais against Beeker, did you think he would answer that he did? And I am not going to say he does or doesn't, that's for Nuet to do. But, I can tell you that the trolling he has ben directing at the mods since being deleted by the mods is not helping them stay off his back. So, even if there is bias (and I wouldnt know if there is), he has to assume a fair share of the reason for it.