NationStates Jolt Archive

In the UN forum, could we have debate on pending resolutions be confined to one or two threads? It's very hard to follow the debate when it's scattered all over the place.

[ Poll ] Why the "Bill of No Rights" is pointless
People vote against this?!
The Bill of No Rights [ Goto page: 1 ... 4, 5, 6 ]
The Bill of No Rights=bad idea [ Goto page: 1, 2, 3 ]
Abuse of UNVote Against The Bill Of No Rights! [ Goto page: 1 ... 9, 10, 11 ]
The Global Market copied his proposal off a website! [ Goto page: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]
The Global Market, at one point, voted AGAINST "TBoNR&qThe Bill of No Rights
Support the Bill of No Rights! [ Goto page: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]
NS-UN Update ENDORSES Bill of No Rights [ Goto page: 1, 2 ]

That's a grand total of 11 threads on the same resolution.

I already asked Hack about why redundant threads involving olitics were allowed to exist.

It is because otherwise people complain that they are being censored.

I already asked Hack about why redundant threads involving olitics were allowed to exist.

It is because otherwise people complain that they are being censored.

I believe phpBB has a way to merge threads...

I believe phpBB has a way to merge threads...

If it does, the boss hasn't enabled it on these forums. We can split threads, but not merge 'em.