Qaaolchoura
23-09-2003, 03:19
When proposals have distinctly Orrwellian names, or have a description different from the title (examples below), does that count as an inappropriate proposal?
Examples:
________________________
Xexan Enviroment Law
A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.
Category: Environmental Industry Affected: All Businesses Proposed by: Xexo
Description: No country shall make a law preventing the advancement of society in order to protect a species.
________________________
The Right To Arms
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.
Category: Human Rights Strength: Significant Proposed by: The New Russian Czar
Description: It is the basic right of every person to have a fire arm,it gives everyone a way to defend themselfs.However,it must a law that to have a fire arm there must be a backround check,and the person should be watched carefully and put on a government file.As the Tsar of a crime free nation,you can take it from me.
~Ivan,Tsar of All Russia
________________________
Maximum Tax Rate
A resolution to reduce income ine
quality and increase basic welfare.
Category: Social Justice Strength: Strong Proposed by: TakeDownMalkelehRebels Description:
For all UN Members:
1. We, the peoples of the world declare
that there is an absolute maximum value
of taxation, beyond which a governing body
must be declared to be in breach of proper
and sensible social justice.
2. A government taxing its public more than
50% is considered to be engaged in criminal
social activity, for no government can claim
to be concerned for the good of its people
if it imposes such an impossible level of
taxation on them.
3. Thus, we hereby condemn all governments that
choose to tax its people more than 50%, and request
in the strongest of terms that they re-consider
their choice.
________________________
POW's
A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.
Category: International Security Strength: Significant Proposed by: Sinsion Description: Why should I have to spend my countries dollars on other nations troops if they are attacking my nation and the surrender we should be allowed to treat them as we wish. In past wars the enemy in a non un state has treated my troops like dogs and almost caused us to lose the war. I sujest we be able to treat their troops they way they treat ours with absoululty no respect.
________________________
For those oblivious to irony, the first descriptor claims that it is pro-environment, but in fact makes most environmental protections illegal, the second is put under civil rights instead of gun control, the third claims to reduce income inequality, while in fact setting a maximum taxt rate.
The fourth is more debateable, but I still think that it belongs under "moral decency", as this would in fact save some military costs.
Examples:
________________________
Xexan Enviroment Law
A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.
Category: Environmental Industry Affected: All Businesses Proposed by: Xexo
Description: No country shall make a law preventing the advancement of society in order to protect a species.
________________________
The Right To Arms
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.
Category: Human Rights Strength: Significant Proposed by: The New Russian Czar
Description: It is the basic right of every person to have a fire arm,it gives everyone a way to defend themselfs.However,it must a law that to have a fire arm there must be a backround check,and the person should be watched carefully and put on a government file.As the Tsar of a crime free nation,you can take it from me.
~Ivan,Tsar of All Russia
________________________
Maximum Tax Rate
A resolution to reduce income ine
quality and increase basic welfare.
Category: Social Justice Strength: Strong Proposed by: TakeDownMalkelehRebels Description:
For all UN Members:
1. We, the peoples of the world declare
that there is an absolute maximum value
of taxation, beyond which a governing body
must be declared to be in breach of proper
and sensible social justice.
2. A government taxing its public more than
50% is considered to be engaged in criminal
social activity, for no government can claim
to be concerned for the good of its people
if it imposes such an impossible level of
taxation on them.
3. Thus, we hereby condemn all governments that
choose to tax its people more than 50%, and request
in the strongest of terms that they re-consider
their choice.
________________________
POW's
A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets.
Category: International Security Strength: Significant Proposed by: Sinsion Description: Why should I have to spend my countries dollars on other nations troops if they are attacking my nation and the surrender we should be allowed to treat them as we wish. In past wars the enemy in a non un state has treated my troops like dogs and almost caused us to lose the war. I sujest we be able to treat their troops they way they treat ours with absoululty no respect.
________________________
For those oblivious to irony, the first descriptor claims that it is pro-environment, but in fact makes most environmental protections illegal, the second is put under civil rights instead of gun control, the third claims to reduce income inequality, while in fact setting a maximum taxt rate.
The fourth is more debateable, but I still think that it belongs under "moral decency", as this would in fact save some military costs.