NationStates Jolt Archive


The Vale of Hinnom...Serious Complaint of Mod Abuse

20-09-2003, 04:47
Who has been giving The Vale of Hinnom access to my Telegrams?

I am f*cking livid...

Which one of you nazis is it eh? :x
20-09-2003, 04:51
The one you've been sexually harassing, if you must know.
20-09-2003, 04:55
The one you've been sexually harassing, if you must know.

I havn't been sexually harrassing anybody and I have telegram evidence to prove it...

Which still doesn't answer the question...
20-09-2003, 05:00
The one you've been sexually harassing, if you must know.

I havn't been sexually harrassing anybody and I have telegram evidence to prove it...

Uh.... yeah. Deleting telegrams = positive evidence of innocence :roll:
Free Outer Eugenia
20-09-2003, 05:02
Online sexual harassment?! now I've seen everything. *cyber pinches beeker's left hindcheek*
20-09-2003, 05:03
The one you've been sexually harassing, if you must know.

I havn't been sexually harrassing anybody and I have telegram evidence to prove it...

Uh.... yeah. Deleting telegrams = positive evidence of innocence :roll:

No telegrams that I still have...and can produce

My question is still not answered...who has access?
20-09-2003, 05:04
The one you've been sexually harassing, if you must know.

I havn't been sexually harrassing anybody and I have telegram evidence to prove it...

Uh.... yeah. Deleting telegrams = positive evidence of innocence :roll:

No telegrams that I still have...and can produce

My question is still not answered...who has access?

If he thinks, and the reciever of the alledged telegrams thinks that you're being inappropriate, would it be inconceivable that he got them from that person?
20-09-2003, 05:07
The one you've been sexually harassing, if you must know.

I havn't been sexually harrassing anybody and I have telegram evidence to prove it...

Uh.... yeah. Deleting telegrams = positive evidence of innocence :roll:

No telegrams that I still have...and can produce

The trouble is, Beeker, that neither having telegrams which say X nor not having telegrams witch say X is conclusive proof that you weren't sexually harassing her.

Furthermore... if she has not deleted hers... they are the final proof.

In which case you're hooped.
20-09-2003, 05:07
If he thinks, and the reciever of the alledged telegrams thinks that you're being inappropriate, would it be inconceivable that he got them from that person?

The reciever of the telegram does not think it is inappropriate though...and I have Tms to prove it...so who?
20-09-2003, 05:09
If he thinks, and the reciever of the alledged telegrams thinks that you're being inappropriate, would it be inconceivable that he got them from that person?

The reciever of the telegram does not think it is inappropriate though...and I have Tms to prove it...so who?

Lieing is also inconceivable?
Raevyn
20-09-2003, 05:13
If he thinks, and the reciever of the alledged telegrams thinks that you're being inappropriate, would it be inconceivable that he got them from that person?

The reciever of the telegram does not think it is inappropriate though...and I have Tms to prove it...so who?

Lieing is also inconceivable?
lying*
20-09-2003, 05:13
If he thinks, and the reciever of the alledged telegrams thinks that you're being inappropriate, would it be inconceivable that he got them from that person?

The reciever of the telegram does not think it is inappropriate though...and I have Tms to prove it...so who?

Lieing is also inconceivable?
lying*

Is it? I can't spell.
Raevyn
20-09-2003, 05:21
If he thinks, and the reciever of the alledged telegrams thinks that you're being inappropriate, would it be inconceivable that he got them from that person?

The reciever of the telegram does not think it is inappropriate though...and I have Tms to prove it...so who?

Lieing is also inconceivable?
lying*

Is it? I can't spell.
Ya learn something new everyday. :P
Tactical Grace
20-09-2003, 05:57
Beeker, as far as I know, only Game Moderators and the Admin would be able to access your telegrams, unless someone knows your password. It is also possible that your correspondence has been leaked by the correspondent. More likely, however, is the possibility that someone merely hinted at knowledge, and you fell for it.
The SLAGLands
20-09-2003, 06:54
Ya learn something new everyday. :P

"Every day" should be two words in this context.

See? You DO learn something every day! :P
Neutered Sputniks
20-09-2003, 09:24
Ok, so we've got wild accusations that someone's read Beeker's telegrams, and/or that the information contained therein was leaked. I see no evidence, no proof, and I dont even see who Beeker was supposedly sexually harrassing.


Basically, until SOMEONE can provide some more concrete information than simply that so and so said such and such to whomever (which doesnt tell the Mods diddly-squat), I'm not terribly inclined to take any sort of action.