NationStates Jolt Archive

http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj31/chazsapphire/A144.png
To: Arms dealers, storefronts and designers the world over

Chazakain Military Command has decided to upgrade its airforce to a true 5th(or at least late 4th) generation power.
As our domestic suppliers cannot comply with our needs, we are currently looking to employ foreign industries. We are looking for the following:

A general purpose vertical take off and landing platform for our marines and naval units to be used in recon, anti shipping and anti air as needed.
A fighter designed to be launched from modern carriers.
Helicopters for the following tasks:
Fire support
Transport(of supplies and troops)
Anti shipping
A fighter that can do many tasks including:
Anti shipping/naval
Anti Air
Anti Ground
A bomber for bombing of military targets.
An unmanned recon drones design
We will also require ammo for all of the previous.

All aircraft must be equipped with the latest weaponry, avionics and stealth designs.
We await your replies.

Sincerely
Chazakain Command

The Commonwealth would like to submit several designs for your needs. The first is the RQ-15 Jager (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14157907&postcount=50) UCAV, along with the B-92 Shrike (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=13993074&postcount=34) bomber, F-43 Sleipnir (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=13993077&postcount=35), our CV-35 Globestar (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14141453&postcount=45) and CV-30 Vogel (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=13857787&postcount=1) transports. We also have Naval variants (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14349864&postcount=3) of our RQ-15 and F-43 Sleipnir.

-CFUS

M.A.C Heavy Industries | Defense Statement:

We wish to inform the Chazakain Command,that even though we cannot enter the trials with any kind of aircraft,we may,if requested,provide all ammunition needed to test and equip the aircrafts.

If so,please inform us of the quantities and calibers and types of ammunitions needed.

We produce a wide range of ammunition:

-Tracer

-Armor Piercing

-Armor Piercing Explosive/High Explosive

-Depleted Uranium Armor Piercing

-Training

-Custom Ammunition (On Request)

We also research and develop special kinds of ammunition on request.

Thank you.

------------------------------------------

For any inquiries please contact us:

Link To Storefront: http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=570831

M.A.C Direct Line: 21-456-3450

M.A.C@DefenseNet.Agle

Thank you,

M.A.C Heavy Industries Defense Management.

To: Chazakian Command
From: Mondo Advertising, C. of DC
Re: New 'birds'

First off, we recommend you peruse the catalogs of our two main suppliers of aircraft, Boris Rotorcraft (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14335941&postcount=2) and Luis Aviation (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=14335950&postcount=3), and come to your own conclusions based on the selection we have. You are the best judge of your own procurement needs, after all.

As for our own suggestions, we can fulfill the following requirements:
Fire Support Helicopter: AH-62 Sutai or AH-62D down-market Sutai (Luis Aviation)
Transport Helicopter: CH-25 Virgil (Boris Rotorcraft)
Anti-shipping Helicopter: SH-25 SeaVirgil (anti-ship & ASW; BR) or SH-62 SeaSutai (anti-ship only; LA)
Bomber: FB-128 Broadsword (LA) or, if you have sufficient rockets to lift it, B-125 Trilobite (BR)
Unmanned recon drone: RD-5 Nightwing (BR)

Please inform us which aircraft you are interested in, and we will deliver you examples of the appropriate planes, along with required ammunition; our technicians and test pilots will demonstrate the capabilities of the sample aircraft on appropriate testing ranges.

Encrypted Communication to the Chazakain Military Command:

Should the Chazakain military be willing to wait, the United Yanitarian Aerospace Investment Fund and Yanitarian Government would be willing to complete a number of exceptional aircraft to outfit their military.

What may interest your military is the YA-42E Corsaire (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=577836), which is already available, and the Am-22 Boucanier (http://z4.invisionfree.com/NSDraftroom/index.php?showtopic=4642), which will be available soon, and will fill many of the requirements your nation has set forth.

We would like to assure you that all further designs will be of similar quality, and by contracting the UYAIF, all aircraft will have at least some degree of parts commonality, lessening the strain on logistics.

OOC: Also, unlike those above me, my designs are all draftroom approved.

OOC: I'd complain that I'm still waiting (after 5-6 days) for my validation email to be processed, but your designs don't compete with mine (yet).

To: Chazakian
From: The Universal Defense Corporation
Upon seeing your advertisment for the acquistion of new aircraft and rotory vehicles, we would like to offer up our catalogue of military aircraft (http://z10.invisionfree.com/Universal_Defense/index.php?c=2) for you to review. As you are already familiar with our company and have purchased from us before, we feel that our products will not only meet, but well exceed any and all expectations you may have for them.

As for our suggestions, the available Aerospace equipment is somewhat limited at this time, although we can assure you that they are of the utmost quality in design and capacity.

-F-29 "Prowler" (http://z10.invisionfree.com/Universal_Defense/index.php?showtopic=60&st=0&#last): Carrier-launched Interceptor. Doesn't have stealth capability, but makes up for it with sheer brute strength.

-B-63 Bomber (http://z10.invisionfree.com/Universal_Defense/index.php?showtopic=49): Good, all around bomber. Very hardy and reliable in all weather and environments, not to mention under frequent and relentless enemy contact.

-Silenkov SL-10 AWACS (http://z10.invisionfree.com/Universal_Defense/index.php?showtopic=52): Although an AWACS aircraft wasn't specifically requested in your acquisition order, we feel that including the SL-10 could do no harm. Currently in use with the Falkasian Navy and Air Force, it has one of the best service records in the both fleets, as well as one of the highest crew comfort ratings.

-AMRAAM-7 Air-to-Air Missile (http://z10.invisionfree.com/Universal_Defense/index.php?showtopic=44): This missile is probably one of the best ever built by the Universal Defense Corporation. It can be mounted on almost any aircraft, can make adjustments to it's course in case of flares and/or evasive manuevers, and when it arrives, can blow it's target into dust.

So please, review our submissions and tell us what you think.

OOC: I'd complain that I'm still waiting (after 5-6 days) for my validation email to be processed, but your designs don't compete with mine (yet).

OOC: Try redoing your registration, it might have been sent to the wrong email. As to the remark about how my designs don't compete with yours, that's awfully egotistical for someone who hasn't put their designs out for peer review. You've had your storefront for a week, try not to let your head grow too big.

OOC: I agree with Yanitaria. You might need to redo your registration for NSD. Also, i've not only looked over, but USE Yanitarian military equipment. His equipment is good; AND peer reviewed. I've also seen your equipment. I'll just say that your stuff needs peer review, and leave it at that.

OOC - I didn't mean that I don't compete with Yanitaria in an egotistical sense, but in the sense that I wasn't submitting any bids in the same categories as Yanitaria for this contract. Besides, I don't really compete with you, Yanitaria; I'm not in the same league. As you said, I've been around for a week; nobody should seriously be looking to me for stuff that you have done, since your stuff is better, unless they're looking for something you haven't yet released to export. I'm sorry my words got misinterpreted.

Also, Lamoni, would you mind sending me a TG letting me know what should be changed? I know my stuff is probably not great, that's why I tried twice to register for the Draftroom, and have an 'in development' thread (in my signature) for peer review. I admit I didn't place everything there, largely because some designs I wanted to get out there quickly for contracts and such. Peer review means you don't just 'leave it at that'; it means you help out those who don't know how to design as well through constructive criticism.

Sorry for clogging up this thread.

Snip

OOC: Oh, dude, seriously, my fault there. I totally misinterpreted that. Sorry if I seemed a bit like an asshole for immediately thinking you were insulting my designs. If you have msn or something, TG me and we can talk about aircraft design. Btw, before you get on NSD, I'd suggest redoing your designs in metric. NSD is unforgiving about that, and tend to cuss a lot.

[OOC: How pathetic. Stop spamming up this thread with your childish idiocy]

bump for more designs.