NationStates Jolt Archive


In development...

Defense Corporations
25-12-2008, 23:20
[secret IC; please critique OOC]
Internal design document, excerpts
MC-16 Fort Shaw
The Fort Shaw is a large missile cruiser, designed to be a primary anti-air and anti-missile escort for carrier groups. It has nuclear power, allowing it to stay on station with nuclear carriers as long as food and supplies are available. Its primary armament is found in its three 61-cell VL systems, providing the Fort Shaw with 183 missiles that can be tailored to different mission requirements (antiship, fleet AD, ABM, local AD, antisub, etc).

Armament: three 61-cell Mk.41 VLS, two triple 21" (533mm) torpedo tube mounts, two 5"/54 caliber (127mm) DP cannon, four Goalkeeper CIWS, six SeaRAM PD systems, four Mk.6 8-cell launchers for SAM-97S Seaviper (Lidar-guided SAM)
Airgroup: 1 SH-25 & 2 SH-60.
Crew: 66 officers, 660 enlisted
Electronics: AN/SQQ-89(V)3 Sonar suite, AN/SPS-55 Surface search radar, AN/SPY-3 AESA radar (combines gun fire control, air search, ABM & short-range surface search/navigation), AN/SLY-2 advanced EW suite, AN/SLQ-25 Nixie decoy, Mk. 36 chaff launcher, SL-49 Air search Lidar.
Power plant: 2 C1W+ nuclear reactors, 80000shp each
Speed: 32.5 knots (60km/h)
Length: 920'6" (280.6m)
Beam: 121' (36.9m)
Draft: 33" (10m)
Displacement: 15565 tons (14120.3305 tonnes)

SAL-49 shipborne air search Lidar
This is a short-range 'laser radar', using lasers for detection and ranging of aircraft and providing guidance for the SAM-97S.

Laser: 1000nm IR laser
Max range: 18.5km (11.5 miles)
Altitude: 22860m (75000')

Variant: AAL-49 (airborne air search lidar; guides AAM-97L)
Defense Corporations
26-12-2008, 06:14
AAM-97 Viper
Based on the proven AIM-9 Sidewinder, the AAM-97 is a longer, wider version of the same. It takes the capabilities of the AIM-9X and places them in a larger frame, providing a longer range and a heavier warhead.

Launch weight: 100kg (220 lb)
Speed: Mach 2.5
Range: 1-20km (0.62-12.4 miles)
Guidance: IR-homing
Warhead: 10kg (22lb) annular blast fragmentation
Diameter: 15cm (6")
Length: 3m (9'10.1")
Wingspan: 70cm (3'3.6")

Variants: AAM-97L (Lidar-guided), SAM-97 (SAM), SAM-97S (ship-launched SAM), ARM-97 (anti-radar; longer, with a larger warhead (but slower speed); uses EHF active radar homing with home-on jam), ARM-97D (down-graded anti-radar; uses a broad-band passive radar guidance seeker), AAM-97H (high-altitude; uses the Hercules Mk. 58 motor found on the AIM-7 to achieve higher speeds and altitudes)

Price: AAM-97 $90000, AAM-97L $150000, SAM-97 $92000, SAM-97S $92400, ARM-97 $130000, ARM-97D $118000, AAM-97H $110000

Does this seem reasonable?
Defense Corporations
26-12-2008, 06:43
LA/AAR-71 Airborne AESA Radar
Designed to detect, track and engage targets at beyond visual range, this radar is an active phased-array radar. It is solid-state, making maintenance much easier; its high scan rate confounds enemy jammers and radar warning receivers.

Range: 380km
Max power: 15kW
Azimuth: 120 degrees

[this is the AN/AWG-9+]
The PeoplesFreedom
26-12-2008, 06:43
You really need to join the NS draftroom.

Check my sig.
Defense Corporations
26-12-2008, 06:45
I signed up; just waiting for my email to be validated.
How bad do these designs look? I'm particularly curious about my two-hull battlecarrier design...
The PeoplesFreedom
26-12-2008, 06:47
All I can say to that is the era of lol superdreadnought and supercapital designs of NS thankfully died in 07.
Defense Corporations
26-12-2008, 06:50
Hooray! So, it's more of a missile spam era? Good, that means lots of arsenal ships and aegis ships and so on...

Well, now I'll just have to redesign the stand-in for the Sea Shadow.
The PeoplesFreedom
26-12-2008, 06:51
It all depends on who you rp with... naturally. The average player will launch 13,000 missiles at you :P, without regard to other things.
Defense Corporations
26-12-2008, 07:02
Fair enough.
Defense Corporations
26-12-2008, 07:28
revised!
Defense Corporations
26-12-2008, 07:56
M1500 Monster
Some say the era of big-gun artillery is over. The Monster disagrees. The M1500 Monster, armed with a 12" (304.8mm) howitzer, can deliver shells (including cluster munitions or laser-guided shells) 50000-78000m downrange. It is self-propelled, with torsion-bar suspension, and carries three shells; a separate ammunition vehicle carries spares.

Weight: 55 tons (50 tonnes)
Length: 16.5m
Width: 3.5m
Height: 3.5m
Powerplant: Perkins 1200hp diesel
Armament: 12" (304.8mm) Mk. 12 howitzer (3 shells); 12.7mm M2HB AAMG (2000 rounds)
Armor: 13mm max
Range: 523km (325 miles)
Speed: 55km/h (34 mph)
Crew: 7 (driver, 2 gunners, 4 loaders)

Mk. 12 Howitzer
The weapon behind the Monster, this is a 12" (304.8mm) long-range howitzer.

Shell types: Laser-guided, cluster munitions, rocket-assisted projectile, AP, HE
Max range: 50km (normal); 78km (RAP)
Googlewoop
26-12-2008, 10:02
OOC

All I can say to that is the era of lol superdreadnought and supercapital designs of NS thankfully died in 07.

...and thank @#*$ for that! I swear if I heard 1 more "nautical engineer" tell me it was possible...

Anyway, back on topic, designs look good to me. Just wondering how you're fitting 6 VLSs onto a ship only 100m longer than a Ticonderoga Class, which has only 2. That will be your first problem in the draft room I should think.
Defense Corporations
26-12-2008, 18:44
Six may be a little excessive, on second thought. Three makes more sense.
The displacement's probably too big. No battleship guns, no battleship armor. Would 12000-15000 tons make sense?
Defense Corporations
26-12-2008, 20:35
All designs here have been appropriately modified, and are now on offer.
Please choose six of the following design proposals -
ATGM, carrier, SWATH patrol boat, flying wing fighter, flying wing bomber, cruise missile, hydrofoil transport, hydrofoil patrol boat, pure arsenal ship, missile carrier, stealth fighter, or fighter
Defense Corporations
26-12-2008, 22:15
How's this? Also, is anyone even on the Draftroom any more?

T-4 Lynx
The Lynx is our first tank to mount a electro-thermal-chemical gun. It is armed with the Mk. 14 105mm ETC gun, which is based on the venerable M68 rifled 105mm gun. Its armor protection scheme consists of a sloped, composite matrix of laminated ceramic-nickel-steel alloy, providing RHAe of 720mm. Powered by the GD883 V12 water-cooled diesel, the Lynx has respectable performance, and features helical spring suspension.

Weight: 52 tonnes (57.3 tons)
Length: 7.3m (23'11.4"); with gun, 9.068m (29'9")
Width: 3.74m (12'3")
Height: 2.50m (8'2")
Crew: 4
Armor: RHAe=720mm (max)
Armament: Mk. 14 105mm ETC smoothbore (36 shells), 12.7mm M2HB MG (coaxial; 2250 rounds), 7.62mm MG (AA; 4000 rounds)
Engine: GD883 diesel, 1500hp (1119kW)
Power/weight: 28.8hp/tonne
Transmission: RK325 hydromechanical automatic, 5 gears
Operational range: 500km (311 miles)
Max velocity: 64km/h (40mph)

Mk.14 105mm ETC smoothbore
Muzzle velocity: 1843.75 m/s
Weight: mount - 3500kg (7716.2 lb); barrel - 1300kg (2866 lb)
Barrel length: 50 calibers
Effective range: 5km (3.1 miles) with APFSDS; 8.5km (5.3 miles) with LAHAT tank-fired ATGM
Shell types: APFSDS, HEAT, LAHAT, HE, HESH (anti-bunker)
The PeoplesFreedom
26-12-2008, 22:25
That RHAe is very poor, less than even the modern Abrams, which is hardly NS grade, other than that, you have a simple stat block which no details at all. For a look at a modern NS tanks, search for the Nakil, Lince, MCA-7, or LY4A2 Wolfhound.
Defense Corporations
26-12-2008, 22:33
What is the RHAe of the Abrams?
The PeoplesFreedom
26-12-2008, 22:38
It varies according to location, but according to this (http://members.tripod.com/collinsj/protect.htm) site, which is commonly cited, it is around 980 on the turret front. Of course, your tank is lighter, which could explain the difference.
Defense Corporations
26-12-2008, 22:44
My tank being lighter probably is the difference. I could probably get away with more armor, perhaps a total of 1000mm RHAe, since I took the proposed Lince (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lince_(tank)), lengthened it a bit, gave it a slightly heavier gun and a somewhat heavier engine, and changed out the suspension.

Perhaps it's a 'medium tank'? Poor protection and speed, but a good gun? I'll work up a full MBT in time. Hell, this is more reasonable than saying I've got a tank with similar capabilities to the Nakíl right away. Better that I get there in spurts.

Other than the light armor, is it fine? If I change the armor to 1000mm RHAe, would that be fine?
The PeoplesFreedom
26-12-2008, 23:30
I would personally class it as a light tank, not because of its weight but rather its protection and main armament. The 105mm is going to have a tough time penetrating the frontal armor of standard main battle tanks even at close range, which means it would have to flank around to the sides or rear to score a kill. You can't really rely on this during actual combat, especially if your enemy uses tanks with main armaments that not only have long-range, but also a high one-hit kill probability.

I could see the tank as a useful one if you added either a standard 120mm gun or other means of killing tanks, such as ATGM's.

You also have no APS nor ERA which makes it even more venerable to enemy missile systems.

To start designing, improving RL designs are a good place to start.
Defense Corporations
26-12-2008, 23:48
Damn. I was hoping the higher muzzle velocity would allow for proper penetration. I went a step down in gun barrel size to save on weight.

What muzzle velocity would a 105mm ETC gun need to penetrate? Or a 120mm ETC gun? Or a 115mm ETC gun?

I'll probably call it a 'second-tier' medium tank, in parallel with my T-42 Oliver. Both are good for taking on late Cold War tanks, but aren't really able to handle NS warfare. To me, it's too slow for a light tank.

Forgot about ERA. Active protection systems will come later on, when I convert other tanks.

My plan is to convert or adapt failed RL designs, like the aforementioned Lince.

Also, what happened to the Draftroom?
The PeoplesFreedom
26-12-2008, 23:54
Draftroom still here and active. Our lazy admins just need to approve you, since we get spammed by bots and have to filter those out.

Muzzle velocity needed relies on various different factors, so it's hard to say, really.
Defense Corporations
27-12-2008, 00:32
That's fine; I'll wait.

Fair enough. At least it's good against light tanks and IFVs and stuff like that. I'll edit the fluff and throw in some ERA.
Defense Corporations
28-12-2008, 04:53
RD-5 NightWing (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/46/DarkStar_Tier_III.jpg)
This is a stealthy, high-altitude, high-performance recon drone. Fitted with the Progress DV-2 engine, it can reach altitudes of up to 15km.

Powerplant: 1 Progress DV-2 turbofan, 4850lbf (21.58kN)
Weight: Empty - 3960kg (8720lb); Max load: 7720kg (13000lb)
Length: 9.2m (30')http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=577619
Wingspan: 23m (75'5.5)
Fuselage width: 7.3152m (24')
Cruising speed: 513km/h (318.8mph)
Range: 925km (575 miles)
Service ceiling: 15000m (49212.6')
Endurance: 8 hours
Payload: optical sensor or radar or camera

Price: $7.4 million
Defense Corporations
29-12-2008, 00:09
Mk. 8 Sea Serpent
The Sea Serpent is a large-bore torpedo intended to destroy carriers and other capital ships. It is 1000mm in diameter, nearly twice as large as conventional 21” torpedoes. It is powered by two 500hp Swashplate engines geared to a pump-jet propulsor and fueled by Otto II monopropellant, and has a 575kg Composition H6 warhead. The Mk.8 uses the same Common Broadband Advanced Sonar System that guides the Mk. 48 ADCAP torpedo.

Powerplant: two swashplate engines, 500hp each
Length: 11m
Diameter: 1000mm
Weight: 3178.3kg (7007lb)
Range: 38km at 52 knots, 50km at 40 knots
Warhead: 575kg (1267.7lb) H6 (45% RDX, 30% TNT, 20% powdered aluminum, 5% paraffin wax)
Max depth: 770m
Max speed: 52 knots

Variant: Mk.8N (nuclear torpedo; replaces warhead with a nuclear warhead)
Defense Corporations
29-12-2008, 00:13
Proposals:
F-21 Anteater - modernization of F-111 design into a multirole fighter
ATGM-11 Kestrel - based on SRAW, but with larger warhead
T-1 Desert Lion - NS-scale MBT (probably around 60-70 tonnes; 127mm ETC gun; 2000+mm RHAe; modern APS & ERA) based on the Osório
Defense Corporations
29-12-2008, 03:01
UV-2313 Jaguarundi
This is a new utility vehicle, intended to serve as a light transport, an ambulance, a light weapons platform, a prime mover, a light AD vehicle, or an anti-ordnance vehicle. It is fitted with a 6.2L Lamborghini V12 gasoline engine generating 633bhp and equipped with a 3-speed automatic transmission. Built around a tubular steel cage, the cabin seats five soldiers in addition to the driver. For added protection against mines, the UV-2313 has a 'v'-shaped hull. It is built with cage armor (for defeating shaped-charge weapons) and 3" (76.2mm) of Tensylon polyethylene-composite armor (with spall lining) as standard, and can be fitted with the Trophy Active Protection System, a Boomerang Sniper Detection System, and an extra 12" (300mm) of ceramic armor.

Powerplant: 6.2L (6194cc) Lamborghini V12 engine, 633bhp
Transmission: 3-speed automatic
Payload: 1.36 tonnes (3000lb)
Suspension: 4x4 wheeled
Crew: 1+5 passengers
Ground clearance: 410mm (15")
Armor: 76.2mm (3") Tensylon composite armor; cage armor
Operational range: 800km (497.1 miles)
Max speed: 111km/h (69mph)
Weight: curb - 8 tonnes (17637lb); gross - 9.6 tonnes (21164.4 lb)
Length: 4.572m (15')
Width: 2.64m (8.67')
Height: 2.64m (8.67')
Fording depth: 0.762m (2.5')
Fuel capacity: 26 gallons
Fuel type: gasoline
Armament: Common remotely-operated weapons station (CROWS) with Mk.19 40mm AGS or M2HB or NSVT 12.7mm MG or M240B 7.62mm MG or M249 5.56mm MG

Variants: UV-2313U (Up-armored; includes Trophy APS (2 launchers, F/G-band radar), Frag 6 kit applique armor & Boomerang mobile shooter detection system; adds 0.6 tonnes (1320lb)), UV-2313AT (Anti-Tank; replaces CROWS with a BGM-71F TOW-2B or 9M133 Kornet launcher), ADV-2313 (AD Vehicle; replaces CROWS with an M3P 12.7mm MG and two quad launchers for FIM-92 Stinger or 9K310 Igla-1S), UV-2313A (Ambulance; lengthened to 5.91m (19.41'); can carry 6 litters or 12 ambulatory patients; unarmed), UV-2313C (Cargo; lengthened to 5.91m (19.41'); cabin cut in half (now seating only driver & 2 passengers); payload increases to 2.236 tonnes (4929.5lb), UV-2313AO (Anti-Ordnance; CROWS replaced with Zeus 10kW solid-state laser), AT-2313 (Artillery Tractor; tows M119 light howitzers (or other artillery of equivalent weight), MV-2313 (Mortar Vehicle; fitted with 2B9 Vasilek 82mm automatic gun-mortar), UV-2313D (Down-graded; fitted with only 2" (50.8mm) of aluminum armor; CROWS replaced with a traditional crew-served mount; two crew (driver & gunner) & four passengers)

Price: UV-2313 $445000, UV-2313U $525000, UV-2313AT $475000, ADV-2313 $495000, UV-2313A $405000, UV-2313C $500000, UV-2313AO $1.1 million, AT-2313 $400000, MV-2313 $460000, UV-2313D $325000
Defense Corporations
31-12-2008, 17:50
Mk.41 18"/45 caliber naval gun
Designed for the Naseby-class battlecruisers we hope to sell to Ralkovia, the Mk.41 can throw a 1462kg shell 40.5km at speeds of up to 783m/s. Its bore is plated with chromium to lengthen its barrel life. Naseby-class battlecruisers feature two twin turrets for the Mk.41.

Bore: 18" (457mm)
Gun length: 45 calibers (20.565m)
Shell weight: 1462kg (3223lb)
Propellant weight: normal - 292.1kg (644lb); supercharged - 300kg (661.4lb)
Turret weight: 150 tonnes (165.3 tons)
Max range: 40.5km (25.2 miles)
Muzzle velocity: normal shell - 738m/s (2420 feet/s); supercharged shell - 783m/s (2568.9 feet/s)
Rate of fire: 2 rpm per gun, 4 rpm for the turret
Shells: APC (armor-piercing, capped), supercharged APC

Variants: Mk.41S single-gun turret (weight is 60% of Mk.41's weight; turret's rate of fire is cut in half)

Price: Mk.41S $180000, Mk.41 twin turret $260000; shell price - APC $9000, supercharged APC $10000
Soviet Aissur
31-12-2008, 18:47
OOC

I like your designs.
If you were to get a storefront up after fine tuning your designs in the draftroom, I am sure you could sell many of your designs. People like me don't have the imagination to design our own stuff so we spend billions, even trillions on foreign designs. I will keep my eye on your designs, and possibly I will buy some stuff.
Defense Corporations
31-12-2008, 18:53
I've got a storefront (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=577616)...
My registration email has still not yet been validated by the Draftroom. I'm being patient, but also a bit annoyed.

Glad you like my designs.
Soviet Aissur
31-12-2008, 19:17
Yeah I wonder how I missed it.
Defense Corporations
31-12-2008, 19:28
To be fair, it was pretty far back; that's why I've got a link in my signature.
Projects:
SSN, SSK, SSBN/SSGN, SSG, patrol craft, frigates, destroyers, CVS, small carrier, medium carrier, etc.
Defense Corporations
02-01-2009, 04:41
SSN, patrol craft, destroyer, medium carrier - released
SSK - design phase
SSBN/GN, frigate, small carrier - proposal phase
SSG, CVS - shelved

F-21 Anteater
Designed as a multirole fighter, the Anteater will use a trapezoidal wing with wingspan of ~50' at its widest point. It will have ten external pylons (four on each wing and two smaller pylons on the belly), 2 wingtip hardpoints for AAM-97 Vipers, and a nose-mounted weapons bay for a variety of cannon (or fuel, or bombs). It will be powered using 1 F-119-PW-100 pitch-thrust-vectoring turbofan, which should provide sufficient thrust for this smallish aircraft. It will be about 23m long. It will feature the AN/APG-81 AESA radar, along with the AN/ALQ-144A+(5) IR countermeasure and AN/ALQ-128 & AN/ALQ-56C radar countermeasures. It will include some features (though not maintenance-intensive radar-absorbing materials) meant to reduce stealth.
[Stats to follow, in time, along with a heavily revised description]
Lamoni
03-01-2009, 05:31
OOC: One thing that I can tell you right now, is that for things like the "SAL-49 shipborne air search Lidar," you are going to need more information than you currently have on it. MUCH more information.

Draftroom designs generally have both a statblock, AND a write-up. The statblock generally contains measurements of some sort (length, width, speed, etc.), while the write-up describes how everything works.

NSD is going to DEMAND full statblocks and write-ups, but they will help you by identifying things that need improvement. There are lots of people there who will work with you on your designs, as well. Yanitaria, for example, is damn good at aerospace and small arms; so don't think that you have to design EVERYTHING yourself. Most people actually focus their designs on one area that they are knowledgeable about (Lyras does Army, Yanitaria does aerospace and small arms, Questers does Navy, etc.).

I know that you are annoyed at how long that it's taken for you to get the validation e-mail from NSD, but I would suggest that you resubmit it; and get in touch with Macabees. Mac can be really lazy about doing things, but he does run NSD.
Yanitaria
03-01-2009, 05:44
I agree with Lamoni. Before you really get into designs, find something you like, especially where there is a niche, but mostly something you like, and start there. Start designing simple things, and go out and do research. I usually have 30 tabs on mozilla open just to design one airplane, and I take things from various sources, like wikipedia, global security, FAS, Avipedia, and many others. Write about everything you can, everything that makes your design different from existing designs. Describe what it is that you are designing as if you are explaining to someone who doesn't know crap about it. Also, explain the various aspects of the design, like the features of your radar or OLS, what is special about it, and what makes it superior.

It's important to write a lot, even if you don't decide to use it all in your write up. Further, your stat block should be as complete as possible, but don't overload it with useless info. Look at similar designs to decide what is necessary and what isn't.
Defense Corporations
03-01-2009, 08:11
Thanks for the advice. I know that I haven't included sufficient details yet in my descriptions. I know that I need to improve that. I aim to do so. I just will need to have enough time to do so.

Unfortunately, I'm headed back to college soon, so I will probably have much less time for designing. I'll still try to design stuff on the side (mainly doing research into failed designs and considering what might make them work today), but the pace of design (and of posting in general) will slow significantly until March.

As for a niche, I'm tempted to make my niche 'designs based on or inspired by failed designs.' It's what I've been doing so far, and it creates interesting challenges. More specifically, however, I aim to get into ekranoplans (wing-in-ground effect aircraft) - I know a little about them, they don't appear much (if at all) in storefronts, and there's a fairly wide variety of things one can do with the wing-in-ground effect.
Questers
04-01-2009, 18:26
I've got a storefront (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=577616)...
My registration email has still not yet been validated by the Draftroom. I'm being patient, but also a bit annoyed. Er yeah, sorry bout that...

Oops, six people waiting for validation ;)

I am going to turn that admin validation crap off.
Allanea
04-01-2009, 18:57
It all depends on who you rp with... naturally. The average player will launch 13,000 missiles at you :P, without regard to other things.


OOC: I had 500,000 missiles launched at me at one point. In one post.
Questers
04-01-2009, 18:59
OOC: I had 500,000 missiles launched at me at one point. In one post. By who...
Allanea
04-01-2009, 19:00
Blackhelm.
Questers
04-01-2009, 19:04
Blackhelm. I lold.
The PeoplesFreedom
04-01-2009, 20:56
Questers of course would make a really detailed post involving all sorts of things rather than firing 500,000 missilez.

But that's only if he is not drunk or lazy...
Defense Corporations
04-01-2009, 21:20
CM-39
Introduction: Inspired by the Advanced Cruise Missile, this weapon is intended to serve as a low-observable long-range subsonic anti-ship missile. Our 3-4-5 design goal was to deliver a 300kg warhead 4000km to within 5m of the target.

Airframe: We have incorporated a number of features into the airframe to reduce its RCS. These range from general features - radar-absorbent paints, a low-power controlled-emission guidance system, and a beavertail nozzle shield to reduce engine emissions - to frontal (sharp nose cone, forward-swept wings), shoulder (chines), and low-frequency (radome-structured fins and wings) RCS reduction. The missile itself is 9 meters long, allowing for more fuel and a heavier warhead to be carried.

Guidance: The CM-39 uses terrain-contour matching and an inertial navigation system. It is fitted with a GPS - though we expect most nations to attempt to destroy GPS systems on the outbreak of war, we also expect that there will be sufficient GPS systems for it to get at least commercial-level accuracy, and that GPS satellites will be cheap enough to launch to ensure the 5m CEP in our design goals. A DSMAC (digital scene matching area correlation) system is also incorporated into the guidance system in the land-attack variant, allowing the missile to correct its course based on previously-taken images. The CM-39's attack profile is low-altitude, low-observable, low-speed, and long-ranged; it remains subsonic throughout its flight, once released from the bomber that carried it.

Engine: We commissioned our subsidiary, Tsien Engines, to design a new turbofan to give the performance we wanted out of the CM-39; they came through with the TE-T-424 turbofan, which generates 4.24kN (432.4kgf; 953.2lbf) of thrust, sufficient to power the CM-39 at speeds of Mach 0.8. Our ship-based and sub-based variants include a small solid-rocket booster to launch the missile.

Warhead: We fitted a 300kg warhead into the CM-39. The land-attack variant can be fitted with a MEPHISTO warhead, which combines a precharge and initial penetrating charge (total of 110kg) to penetrate a bunker or clear soil with a main warhead (188kg) triggered by a variable delay fuse.

Specifications -
Length: 9m
Wingspan: 3.1m
Diameter: 70.5cm
Weight: 1800kg
Max speed: Mach 0.8 (at 50m above sea level)
Range: 4000km
Warhead: 300kg HE or HEAP warhead; MEPHISTO 188kg main warhead (CM-39L); W-80 5-150kT nuclear warhead (CM-39N)
Propulsion: TE-T-424 turbofan, 432.4kgf thrust

Variants: UCM-39 (sub-launched; fins fold out after launch), SCM-39 (ship-launched from Mk.41L enlarged VLS cells; fins fold out after launch), TCM-39 (launched from torpedo tubes), CM-39N (nuclear warhead), CM-39L (land-attack)

Price: CM-39 $700000, UCM-39 $750000, SCM-39 $745000, TCM-39 $725000, CM-39N $1.1 million, CM-39L $800000

Cross-posted to NS Draftroom (http://z4.invisionfree.com/NSDraftroom/index.php?showtopic=5174). Yay!
Questers
04-01-2009, 21:38
But that's only if he is not drunk or lazy... I should come on NSD drunk again. Those were the days :mp5:

Anyway, as a suggestion Defense Corporations, if you're going to change your designs as per advice from NSD, it's generally easier to put them there first and then put them on II when (hopefully constructive) criticism has been amended, since you don't have to go back and keep editing it.
Defense Corporations
04-01-2009, 21:41
I just got on Draftroom now. That'll be how I do everything from now on; I still like showing my future designs here as well. Draftroom-approved designs (all of my designs, from now on, after critique) will get separate threads; I'll update my new designs (as 'block II' or 'flight II' or 'revised due to recently discovered flaws in ___') after they're critiqued on the Draftroom.
Defense Corporations
04-01-2009, 22:31
F-21 Anteater
Introduction: Our aim was to build a modern multirole fighter. Our design goals were to carry significant external stores at relatively long range in a modestly-stealthy supercruising airframe.

Airframe: We went with a trapezoidal wing, providing the best features of delta wings, forward-swept wings, and standard swept wings. At each wingtip is a hardpoint for our AAM-97 Viper; on the wing itself are eight external pylons. Below the nose is a weapons bay capable of carrying a 20-30mm cannon, a 100kg bomb, or a fuel tank. We incorporated chines - angular features at the nose intended to reduce shoulder RCS, planform-aligned wing and tail edges, a sloped fuselage and canopy, canted vertical surfaces, and a serpentine inlet duct for the engine, along with a signature-assessment system (SAS) designed to inform pilots and maintenance workers when wear-and-tear has degraded the stealthiness of the F-21.

Engine: We went with two TE-T-219 turbofans, an improved version of the engine that which powers the F-22. These generate 15950 kgf (156.4kN; 35163.7lbf) thrust each, providing sufficient thrust to achieve similar performance to the F-22.

Electronics: We fitted our AAR-71 AESA radar, which is a solid-state design resistant to jamming and reception by radar warning receivers due to a high scanning rate. For jamming, we have fitted the AN/ALQ-135(V) active radar jammer and AN/ALQ-144A+(5) IR countermeasure system. The AN/ALQ-99E integrated jamming pod can be fitted, and is standard on EF-21 EW support planes. Finally, our FA-21 fighter-bombers carry the AN/APQ-146 terrain-following radar.

Specifications
Length: 23m
Wingspan: 14.5m
Height: 5.25m
Weight: empty - 21500kg, loaded - 38000kg, max TO - 53750kg
Powerplant: 2 TE-T-219 pitch thrust vectoring turbofans, 15950kgf thrust each
Payload: two 125kg wingtip hardpoints, four 2250kg external pylons (inner wing), four 500kg external pylons (outer wing)
Range: combat - 700km, ferry - 3250km
Speed: supercruising - Mach 1.6 at 12km altitude; max altitude - Mach 2 at 19km altitude; cruising - Mach 0.99 at 10km altitude
Service ceiling: 19km
Wing loading: 300 km/m/m
Rate of climb: 150m/s
Crew: 1

Variants: EF-21 EW support plane, FA-21 fighter-bomber, F-21N carrier-capable, F-21T trainer, F-21D downgraded (reduced stealthiness)

Price: F-21 $88 million, EF-21 $89 million, FA-21 $93 million, F-21N $94 million, F-21T $85 million, F-21D $77 million
Defense Corporations
15-02-2009, 21:19
The following designs are in the pipeline:
IFV-67 series (LTV-67+ advanced light tank; ALTV-67 airborne light tank, ALTV-67+ advanced airborne light tank, ALTV-67-B budget airborne light tank; IFV-67 IFV, -67+ advanced IFV, -67-B budget IFV, -67C command vehicle; EV-67 engineer vehicle, -67B AVLB, -67R ARV, -67D bulldozer, -67+ advanced engineer vehicle; ICV-67 APC, -67+ advanced APC, -67K mobile kitchen, -67M mortar vehicle; ADV-67 AD SPAAG, -67M AD vehicle; and ATV-67 anti-tank vehicle)
ICV-8 series (ICV-8 wheeled APC, -8M mortar vehicle, -8C command vehicle, -8R ARV, -8AO anti-ordnance vehicle, -8AT anti-tank vehicle, -8K mobile kitchen; AT-8 artillery tractor; CV-8 command vehicle; and AV-8 ambulance)
IFV-22 series (IFV-22 IFV, -22T light tank; ICV-22 APC, -22B AVLB, -22M mortar vehicle, -22C command vehicle; RLV-22 MRL; AV-22 ambulance)
T-49 series (T-49 MBT, -49C command tank, -49R ARV, -49C+ advanced command tank, -49+ advanced MBT, and -49B AVLB)
RD-17 series (RD-17 unmanned recon helicopter and RD-17N naval unmanned recon helicopter)
ICE-34 series (ICE-34 infantry combat ekranoplan, ADE-34 air defense ekranoplan, and AE-34 ekranoplan gunship)
H-4 series (CH-4 transport helicopter, CAH-4 assault helicopter, AH-4 attack helicopter, AH-4-B budget attack helicopter, RAH-4 attack/recon helicopter, RAH-4-B budget attack/recon helicopter, and SH-4 ASuW helicopter)
T-11 series (T-11+ advanced MBT, T-11T training tank, T-11H heavy tank, IFT-11+ advanced IFV, IFT-11E+ advanced EW IFV, IFT-11C+ advanced command vehicle, ICT-11+ advanced APC, GT-11C+ advanced artillery command vehicle)
Mk.111 37x167mm cannon (used on IFV-67, IFV-67+, IFV-67-B, IFT-11+, IFT-11E+, AH-4, AE-34, and the ADE-34)
VE/APS-4 active protection system (used on T-11+, T-11H, IFT-11+, IFT-11E+, ICT-11+, IFT-11C+, T-49+, T-49C+, the ICV-8 product line, the IFV-22 product line, and the ICE-34 product line)
VE/APS-5 low-end APS (used on T-49, T-49C, LTV-67+, IFV-67+, EV-67+, ALTV-67+, and the ICV-67+)
MG-106 6.8x43mm minigun (used on CAH-4, RAH-4-B, RAH-4, ICV-67+, and the ICE-34)
CS/SSR-21 airborne surface search radar (used on SH-4)
XR/AGR-150 airborne ground search radar (used on AH-4 and RAH-4)
XR/ANR-22 airborne navigation radar (used on AH-4 product line and ICE-34 product line)
XR/ANR-23 compact airborne navigation radar (used on RD-17 product line)
VE/AAI-220 airborne active IR sensor (used on AH-4-B, RAH-4-B and CAH-4)
BR/GCN-1 ground combat network (used on T-11+, T-11H, IFT-11+, IFT-11E+, ICT-11+, IFT-11C+, the ICV-8 product line, the IFV-22 product line, the CAH-4, the AH-4, the CH-4, the RAH-4, and the ICE-34 product line)
BR/GCN-2 low-end ground combat network (used on the T-49 product line, ALTV-67+, LTV-67+, IFV-67+, EV-67+, RAH-4-B, AH-4-B, and the ICV-67+)
CS/ADS-171 airborne dipping sonar (used on SH-4)
JT/TTS-4 tank thermal sight (used on T-11H, T-11+, T-49 product line, ALTV-67+, ALTV-67, ALTV-67B, IFV-22T, and the LTV-67+)
JT/LTS-2 laser threat-warning system (used on T-11H, T-11+, IFT-11+, IFT-11E+, T-49 product line, LTV-67+, ALTV-67+, EV-67, ALTV-67, IFV-67+, ALTV-67-B, EV-67+, ICV-67, ICV-67+, ATV-67, ICV-8 product line, ICE-34, and the IFV-22 product line)
JT/DVS-14 driver vision system (used on T-11 product line, T-49 product line, LTV-67+, ALTV-67+, ALTV-67, ALTV-67-B, EV-67, EV-67+, IFV-22 product line, ICV-8 product line, ICV-67, ICV-67+, ATV-67, ADV-67, ADV-67M, EV-67R, EV-67B, EV-67D, ICV-67K)
VE/GES-15 ground EW suite (used on T-11H, T-11+, IFT-11E+, IFV-22, and the IFV-67+)
VE/AES-14 airborne EW suite (used on CAH-4 and the ADE-34)
VE/SES-13 shipborne EW suite
SA/SGL-22 55mm smoke grenade launcher (used on T-11 product line, T-49 product line, LTV-67+, IFV-67+, ALTV-67+, ALTV-67, ALTV-67-B, ATV-67, ICV-67+, IFV-22 product line, ICV-8 product line, IFV-67C, and the EV-67+)
CS/TFC-35 tank FCS (used on T-11+, T-11H, ALTV-67+, LTV-67+ and the IFV-22T)
CS/NBC-11 NBC/air conditioning system (used on T-11 product line, IFV-22 product line, LTV-67+, IFV-67+, ALTV-67+, ALTV-67, EV-67+, ICV-67+, ICV-8 product line, ICE-34, and the T-49 product line)
CS/VLD-56 vehicular laser designator (used on IFT-11+, IFT-11E+, IFV-67+, IFV-22, ICV-22, and the ICV-8)
EJ-WG-110 Wankel three-rotor 330hp gasoline engine (used on ICV-8 product line)
Mk.50 rifled 107.95mm/50-caliber gun (used on ALTV-67 and the ALTV-67+)
Mk.51 rifled 120.65mm/58-caliber gun (used on T-49, T-49C, T-49C+, and the T-49+)
Mk.52 160mm/30-caliber demolition gun (used on EV-67 and the EV-67+)
MG-6 6.8x43mm machine gun (used on T-49 product line, LTV-67+, ICV-67, ICV-67+, ALTV-67, ALTV-67+, ALTV-67-B, IFV-67C, EV-67, EV-67+, ICV-8C, and the IFV-22C)
VE/ODL-26 13MW ordnance disposal solid-state laser (used on ICV-8AO)
EJ-FD-12 flat-12 1200hp diesel (used on T-49 product line and the IFV-22 product line)
Mk.90 90mm rocket (used on RLV-22)
TE-TS-763 763kW (1023.2hp) turboshaft (used on H-4 product line)
TE-TS-764 382hp turboshaft (used on RD-17 product line)