Cravan
23-02-2008, 02:40
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c381/crave22/Cravan/lauranatribuneslightlysmaller.png
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c381/crave22/solana.jpg
New Alliance Treaty Organization Announces Reforms
February 22, 2008
Following the Four Day War, the New Alliance Treaty Organization had recessed largely into isolation from much contact with the world while quietly retreating to reinforce its positions and allies. From that time on, the New Alliance ceased most official interaction with the outside world, its member states instead moving on in their own individual interests.
An announcement from the NATO offices in downtown Laurana came as a shock this morning, when the appointment of a new Primus to the New Alliance was made official by the leadership of NATO. The new Primus, a native Cravanian, was inaugurated later in the afternoon. Sir Andrew Rensford was chosen as the new Primus, a former Senator on the Council of Lords representing Tillingham and former Director of Foreign Affairs under Primary Director Gallens. Rensford, who has served as the Eastern Havenic Empire's representative to the New Alliance since its induction, made a brief statement after being confirmed as the new Primus.
"The New Alliance Treaty Organization has been at rest since the devastating Four Day War," Rensford said. "I hope that, through cooperation between members and the international community we can change this. It's my hope that NATO can once again be a driving force for peace in the international community. It's with this belief in mind that NATO has plenty of room to grow with prospects of new members."
Rensford declined to comment on APOC and the current status of the Questarian Commonwealth, instead concentrating on future developments and progress in the organization.
"When people in the world today think of NATO they think of Gholgoth and Automagfreek. Although allies and friends to the organization, I want people to instead think of peace and progress when they think of NATO. NATO can cause change in this world, and that change should be positive change in favor of the prosperity of people everywhere."
Currently Rensford has announced that the New Alliance's offices in Laurana will be upscaled, and possibly occupy the former central complex of the GASN which is currently kept aside by the government.
*********************
New Alliance Treaty Organization
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c381/crave22/NATO2abcopy.png
Preamble
The undersigned Parties to this Treaty place their signature in agreement to the following terms as per the Charter of the New Alliance Treaty Organization, to henceforth be referred to as NATO, with the intent of upholding these vows and virtues to their fullest extent. It is these terms which define and shape the organizational structure and purpose of NATO; ensuring that all nations brought under the collective protection of the organization are guaranteed the rights and privileges spelled out by this Treaty.
The undersigned parties, which agree to this organization's charter, do henceforth reaffirm their commitment to peace and tranquility in our world, and vow to come to the defense of the security of their fellow members should their peaceful existence be threatened.
The nations of NATO pledge their allegiance to one another and to the defense of one another, uniting under one banner to safeguard their peoples and nations. The nations of NATO do affirm that their commitment to the collective defense to one another and to the interests of NATO are just and true.
It is through these basic ideals and virtues that the undersigned nations do hereby accept the Treaty of the New Alliance, as further defined below, as written international law; binding them together in common defense and interest and ensuring their security for a brighter tomorrow.
The Charter of the New Alliance
Article I
The Parties which agree to adhere to this Treaty do hereby pledge to open unlimited relations with other adherents of this Treaty; the interests of common understanding and fellowship in mind. Free and unrestricted trade between member states is encouraged by the Treaty, as well as relaxed immigration regulation and increased cooperation in international agreement.
Article II
The Parties which agree to adhere to this Treaty do hereby pledge that they shall remain active participants in NATO, ensuring continued participation in international agreements which directly relate to NATO as well as participation in NATO policy. The Parties will agree to actively contribute towards peace and security through mutual understanding with fellow adherents to the Treaty as well as with foreign entities which recognize the Treaty as valid but do not adhere to the Treaty.
Parties defined as inactive must either announce themselves as inactive or contact must be lost over a prolonged period of time. This prolonged period will be defined on a case by case basis, with a motion to mark a Party as inactive suggested by an active and concerned Party.
Article III
The Parties which apply to adhere to this Treaty shall be approved by a majority vote of the Assembly of Members, detailed later underneath Article XI, and confirmed by the Director of Foreign Offices and the Primus and/or First Director. All applications to NATO will be processed by the Director of Foreign Offices, who will present applications before the Assembly of Members for further approval.
Article IV
In order to further the goals of security and stability, the Parties will agree to continue to build their ability to defend themselves, either through individual development or through cooperative efforts. Each of the Parties shall maintain its own armed forces to contribute to the overall security of their own legal entity and of the Treaty as a whole.
Article V
The Parties will agree to come together to declare a consensus when the legal status, territorial integrity, political stability, or national security of one or multiple members is declared to be in jeopardy. The Assembly of Members will declare this consensus and the intent of the organization in the face of such a situation.
Article VI
The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or multiple of them which results through unprovoked means shall be considered an attack against the organization. In the event of such an assault, it is the duty of all Parties of the organization to respond with the proper course of action as deemed by the Assembly of Members; including but not limited to the use of force against the offending party or parties. All Parties which adhere to this treaty may undertake the effort of defense at their own discretion, either separately or in concert.
Any action taken in defense of a member shall immediately cease when proper agreement between the Parties and the offending party or parties is made, or when peace and security is reestablished and recognized by the Assembly of Members and Primus.
Article VII
For the purposes of Article V and all subsequent Articles, “unprovoked assault” and other derivatives is defined as the “initiation of force upon an adherent Party without prior military action or threat against the offending foreign party or parties.”
Article VIII
The laws of individual adherent Parties is not to be superseded by this Treaty, unless deemed necessary by majority vote in the Assembly of Members for the preservation of peace and the security of adherent Parties. The ability for individual adherent Parties to exercise political sovereignty over their territorial dominions shall not be inhibited in any way by this Treaty.
Article IX
The Parties agree that no aggressive action shall be taken against a NATO aligned state under any circumstances at the risk of dire consequences. Any Party which commits aggressive action against another NATO aligned state without proper provocation will face ejection from the organization, as well as the threat of imposed sanctions, naval blockade, or reciprocal military action against the offending Party.
Article X
For the purposes of Article IX and all subsequent articles, “NATO aligned state” is to be defined as any member of NATO or any nation friendly to the whole of NATO as determined by the Assembly of Members on a case-by-case basis.”
Article XI
The governmental structure of NATO shall take shape with a well defined executive and a well defined legislature.
The executive, which exists in the form of the Primus and the Directorate, serves as the daily policy-making body of NATO, adhering to the Treaty in its verbatim form and enacting policies with the interests and ideals spelled out in this Treaty in mind. The executive answers directly to the legislature.
The legislature, which takes the form of the Assembly of Members, is the long term policy-making body of NATO. The legislature enacts official policies and amendments to the charter of the Treaty, ensuring the expectations of the Treaty are fulfilled to the fullest degree. The Assembly of Members is composed of one representative from each Party with equal representation given to all Parties.
Article XII
The Parties agree that a defense commission shall be created to operate alongside the Assembly of Members; the likes of which will advise the Assembly of military matters and possible courses of action. The Chairman of the commission will be an appointed military officer from a NATO nation, and serve in the same capacity as a Director.
Article XIII
The Parties agree that no other international treaty shall conflict with the aims and goals set down by this Treaty, maintaining that a Party's position in the organization is not compromised by other engagements. The Parties agree that they shall not enter into any such agreements which would conflict with this Treaty.
Article XIV
The Parties agree to recognize any further amendments which alter or augment the purposes and aims of this Treaty, as approved by the Assembly of Members. All amendment votes to the charter require a quorum of three-fourths (3/4) of the active Parties, as defined in Article II. In order for an amendment to pass, it requires at least two-thirds (2/3) approval from the Parties which cast their vote.
If a quorum of three-fourths of the organization cannot be reached within the designated period of time for voting, an extension of one week (seven (7) days) shall occur. If a quorum is not reached during this extended voting period, the proposed amendment will be rejected.
*********************
NATO home: http://s4.invisionfree.com/NATO_forums
Leadership
Primus Sir Andrew Rensford of Cravan
First Director (NAME) of Automagfreek
Director of Foreign Offices Jessica Lantelme of Illior
Chairman of the Military Committee Lieutenant-General Frederick Koltz of Aequatio
Director of Intelligence Baron Ragez D'Asta of Malatose
Director of Finance Lord Friederich Hazlitov of Derscon
Signatory Parties
Aequatio
Aleos
Allanea
Automagfreek
Carbandia
Castilla y Belmonte
Cravan
Crimmond
Derscon
Don’t Piss Us Off
HailandKill
Haraki
Holy Marsh
IDF
Illior
Malatose
The Macabees
Novacom
Oceania (Azazia)
Scandavian States
Schultaria Prime
Sigma Octavius
Sovereign California
South East Asia (Southeast Asia)
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c381/crave22/solana.jpg
New Alliance Treaty Organization Announces Reforms
February 22, 2008
Following the Four Day War, the New Alliance Treaty Organization had recessed largely into isolation from much contact with the world while quietly retreating to reinforce its positions and allies. From that time on, the New Alliance ceased most official interaction with the outside world, its member states instead moving on in their own individual interests.
An announcement from the NATO offices in downtown Laurana came as a shock this morning, when the appointment of a new Primus to the New Alliance was made official by the leadership of NATO. The new Primus, a native Cravanian, was inaugurated later in the afternoon. Sir Andrew Rensford was chosen as the new Primus, a former Senator on the Council of Lords representing Tillingham and former Director of Foreign Affairs under Primary Director Gallens. Rensford, who has served as the Eastern Havenic Empire's representative to the New Alliance since its induction, made a brief statement after being confirmed as the new Primus.
"The New Alliance Treaty Organization has been at rest since the devastating Four Day War," Rensford said. "I hope that, through cooperation between members and the international community we can change this. It's my hope that NATO can once again be a driving force for peace in the international community. It's with this belief in mind that NATO has plenty of room to grow with prospects of new members."
Rensford declined to comment on APOC and the current status of the Questarian Commonwealth, instead concentrating on future developments and progress in the organization.
"When people in the world today think of NATO they think of Gholgoth and Automagfreek. Although allies and friends to the organization, I want people to instead think of peace and progress when they think of NATO. NATO can cause change in this world, and that change should be positive change in favor of the prosperity of people everywhere."
Currently Rensford has announced that the New Alliance's offices in Laurana will be upscaled, and possibly occupy the former central complex of the GASN which is currently kept aside by the government.
*********************
New Alliance Treaty Organization
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c381/crave22/NATO2abcopy.png
Preamble
The undersigned Parties to this Treaty place their signature in agreement to the following terms as per the Charter of the New Alliance Treaty Organization, to henceforth be referred to as NATO, with the intent of upholding these vows and virtues to their fullest extent. It is these terms which define and shape the organizational structure and purpose of NATO; ensuring that all nations brought under the collective protection of the organization are guaranteed the rights and privileges spelled out by this Treaty.
The undersigned parties, which agree to this organization's charter, do henceforth reaffirm their commitment to peace and tranquility in our world, and vow to come to the defense of the security of their fellow members should their peaceful existence be threatened.
The nations of NATO pledge their allegiance to one another and to the defense of one another, uniting under one banner to safeguard their peoples and nations. The nations of NATO do affirm that their commitment to the collective defense to one another and to the interests of NATO are just and true.
It is through these basic ideals and virtues that the undersigned nations do hereby accept the Treaty of the New Alliance, as further defined below, as written international law; binding them together in common defense and interest and ensuring their security for a brighter tomorrow.
The Charter of the New Alliance
Article I
The Parties which agree to adhere to this Treaty do hereby pledge to open unlimited relations with other adherents of this Treaty; the interests of common understanding and fellowship in mind. Free and unrestricted trade between member states is encouraged by the Treaty, as well as relaxed immigration regulation and increased cooperation in international agreement.
Article II
The Parties which agree to adhere to this Treaty do hereby pledge that they shall remain active participants in NATO, ensuring continued participation in international agreements which directly relate to NATO as well as participation in NATO policy. The Parties will agree to actively contribute towards peace and security through mutual understanding with fellow adherents to the Treaty as well as with foreign entities which recognize the Treaty as valid but do not adhere to the Treaty.
Parties defined as inactive must either announce themselves as inactive or contact must be lost over a prolonged period of time. This prolonged period will be defined on a case by case basis, with a motion to mark a Party as inactive suggested by an active and concerned Party.
Article III
The Parties which apply to adhere to this Treaty shall be approved by a majority vote of the Assembly of Members, detailed later underneath Article XI, and confirmed by the Director of Foreign Offices and the Primus and/or First Director. All applications to NATO will be processed by the Director of Foreign Offices, who will present applications before the Assembly of Members for further approval.
Article IV
In order to further the goals of security and stability, the Parties will agree to continue to build their ability to defend themselves, either through individual development or through cooperative efforts. Each of the Parties shall maintain its own armed forces to contribute to the overall security of their own legal entity and of the Treaty as a whole.
Article V
The Parties will agree to come together to declare a consensus when the legal status, territorial integrity, political stability, or national security of one or multiple members is declared to be in jeopardy. The Assembly of Members will declare this consensus and the intent of the organization in the face of such a situation.
Article VI
The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or multiple of them which results through unprovoked means shall be considered an attack against the organization. In the event of such an assault, it is the duty of all Parties of the organization to respond with the proper course of action as deemed by the Assembly of Members; including but not limited to the use of force against the offending party or parties. All Parties which adhere to this treaty may undertake the effort of defense at their own discretion, either separately or in concert.
Any action taken in defense of a member shall immediately cease when proper agreement between the Parties and the offending party or parties is made, or when peace and security is reestablished and recognized by the Assembly of Members and Primus.
Article VII
For the purposes of Article V and all subsequent Articles, “unprovoked assault” and other derivatives is defined as the “initiation of force upon an adherent Party without prior military action or threat against the offending foreign party or parties.”
Article VIII
The laws of individual adherent Parties is not to be superseded by this Treaty, unless deemed necessary by majority vote in the Assembly of Members for the preservation of peace and the security of adherent Parties. The ability for individual adherent Parties to exercise political sovereignty over their territorial dominions shall not be inhibited in any way by this Treaty.
Article IX
The Parties agree that no aggressive action shall be taken against a NATO aligned state under any circumstances at the risk of dire consequences. Any Party which commits aggressive action against another NATO aligned state without proper provocation will face ejection from the organization, as well as the threat of imposed sanctions, naval blockade, or reciprocal military action against the offending Party.
Article X
For the purposes of Article IX and all subsequent articles, “NATO aligned state” is to be defined as any member of NATO or any nation friendly to the whole of NATO as determined by the Assembly of Members on a case-by-case basis.”
Article XI
The governmental structure of NATO shall take shape with a well defined executive and a well defined legislature.
The executive, which exists in the form of the Primus and the Directorate, serves as the daily policy-making body of NATO, adhering to the Treaty in its verbatim form and enacting policies with the interests and ideals spelled out in this Treaty in mind. The executive answers directly to the legislature.
The legislature, which takes the form of the Assembly of Members, is the long term policy-making body of NATO. The legislature enacts official policies and amendments to the charter of the Treaty, ensuring the expectations of the Treaty are fulfilled to the fullest degree. The Assembly of Members is composed of one representative from each Party with equal representation given to all Parties.
Article XII
The Parties agree that a defense commission shall be created to operate alongside the Assembly of Members; the likes of which will advise the Assembly of military matters and possible courses of action. The Chairman of the commission will be an appointed military officer from a NATO nation, and serve in the same capacity as a Director.
Article XIII
The Parties agree that no other international treaty shall conflict with the aims and goals set down by this Treaty, maintaining that a Party's position in the organization is not compromised by other engagements. The Parties agree that they shall not enter into any such agreements which would conflict with this Treaty.
Article XIV
The Parties agree to recognize any further amendments which alter or augment the purposes and aims of this Treaty, as approved by the Assembly of Members. All amendment votes to the charter require a quorum of three-fourths (3/4) of the active Parties, as defined in Article II. In order for an amendment to pass, it requires at least two-thirds (2/3) approval from the Parties which cast their vote.
If a quorum of three-fourths of the organization cannot be reached within the designated period of time for voting, an extension of one week (seven (7) days) shall occur. If a quorum is not reached during this extended voting period, the proposed amendment will be rejected.
*********************
NATO home: http://s4.invisionfree.com/NATO_forums
Leadership
Primus Sir Andrew Rensford of Cravan
First Director (NAME) of Automagfreek
Director of Foreign Offices Jessica Lantelme of Illior
Chairman of the Military Committee Lieutenant-General Frederick Koltz of Aequatio
Director of Intelligence Baron Ragez D'Asta of Malatose
Director of Finance Lord Friederich Hazlitov of Derscon
Signatory Parties
Aequatio
Aleos
Allanea
Automagfreek
Carbandia
Castilla y Belmonte
Cravan
Crimmond
Derscon
Don’t Piss Us Off
HailandKill
Haraki
Holy Marsh
IDF
Illior
Malatose
The Macabees
Novacom
Oceania (Azazia)
Scandavian States
Schultaria Prime
Sigma Octavius
Sovereign California
South East Asia (Southeast Asia)