Honako
26-07-2007, 00:14
The First European Community Voting Session On Pressing Issues
The European Community (EC)
- A New Organization Built For Mantaining The Sovreignity And Prosperous Economies, Militarys and Powers of Europe
http://img53.imageshack.us/img53/2834/3deuroflagql5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Written by Miguel Perez, Interim President of the European Community
SIC Content:
This is designed in order for the EC members to get a say in the way the European Community operates and the decisions it makes. Sometimes we will meet if you all want too, but mostly this is a simplier way of letting everyone have a say. It has it's flaws, the biggest because I've wrote all this, so sorry for not asking you all before hand, but some of these issues need to be dealt with quickly. This first meeting will help establish the basic things we need to clear up about the EC – where the HQ is, the President of the EC, who is allowed to enter etc. Most of the time when other meetings are called it will be due to a serious situation, and we have a couple of those on our hands currently.
Each member nation receives one vote, either of yes or no, or for one option. They may suggest another option in some cases and vote for that. For this voting session Associate Members will not be allowed to vote pending the vote on proposition number #6. IF a member nation has another proposal they wish to put forward that is urgent, please say. Sorry for taking charge and not giving people more of a chance, however if it’s a small issue and can wait, leave it, though if you want to bring something up I’ll end it to the list of EC proposals. This is only the first meeting, and you’ll all get chances to forward proposals.
EC Proposal List:
#1) Recently The Union of Greater Europe, a non-European Community member, has launched an unprecedented and unwarranted attack on a fellow European nation, and non-EC member, the Czech Republic. The EC is a free and equal organization, so could all vote for one of the following suggestions:
a) launch defensive campaign in the Czech Republic to help defend it from the invasion (EC member nations will have to donate a strong force, weapons or money to the Czech’s)
b) place economic stations on the Union of Greater Europe and use soft powers heavily in order to pressure it into ceasing attacks, such as the halting of trade and closing of waters
c) recognize The Union of Greater Europe as the rightful rulers of the Czech Republic
d) take other course of action (please suggest)
#2) Three new members have desired to join, they are The Kingdom of Donaghadee, New Brittonia and Waldenburg 2. One objection has been made to New Brittonia joining due to the impending war he faces in the North American land of Greenland. Please cast your vote yes or no to each member joining. You may abstain if you wish, though it’s not so helpful. If it is a draw, and no objections are made, the person will enter.
#3) Two cities so far have been put forward for the HQ of the European Community. One is Brussels, the other Luxembourg. However, for a further few days you can put forward cities for the vote, which will be by poll.
#4) Currently no candidates for President of the European Community have been put forward. If you wish to put a candidate forward, follow these simply steps:
Name:
Age:
Previous Important Roles:
Brief Bio:
Each President will serve a one year term before he is replaced. The President must not be affiliated at the time of employment with an EC nation’s government. His jobs will include administering the laws, meetings and foreign policy of the EC, and assisting in deciding on the final outcome of resolutions which are passed by the EC members. (OOC: The President must be strictly neutral really. However, the person who puts forward that character will RP the President, and therefore much of the meetings, if they win.)
#5) The European Community is not a governing body. All member nations operate their own foreign policies. However, at times the EC will have to work as a united powerful bloc in order to be heard. This is a general question – generally speaking, which way you would prefer the EC foreign policy, when in these situations when it must act as a united bloc, to favour:
a) Isolationism – to concentrate on Europe’s affairs mostly, which will make sure that the alliance we have is mostly defensive in nation, and keeps to the primary goal of protecting Europe from outside attacks, whilst remaining quiet but sometimes forceful on the international stage. Pursue relations with non-Euro states, but will leave it mostly up to the member states to do so for themselves. Soft powers (diplomacy) used mostly.
b) Accessibility – this will likely increase the power projection of the EC, making it a more feared group of nations. However, it will also likely make the world more unstable, particular with other alliances vying for power. By going down this route the threat of military intervention may be used regularly in order to “get our own way” and hard powers used (invasions for land expansion, defending nations from others etc.). We will also try and create stronger relations with nations outside of Europe. Some of the core values of the EC may have to be changed. A mixture of hard (military intervention) and soft powers used, but far more willing to be aggressive.
#6) Should Associate Members, currently just observers to meetings, who only receive some of the benefits of the EC for some of the commitment (they sign an NAP instead of a MDP), be allowed to vote on all proposals, just ones that effect them directly if that occurs, or none? Vote yes for which of the three options you prefer, or suggestion another.
Yes:
For Proposals That Effect Them Directly:
Not At All:
The European Community (EC)
- A New Organization Built For Mantaining The Sovreignity And Prosperous Economies, Militarys and Powers of Europe
http://img53.imageshack.us/img53/2834/3deuroflagql5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Written by Miguel Perez, Interim President of the European Community
SIC Content:
This is designed in order for the EC members to get a say in the way the European Community operates and the decisions it makes. Sometimes we will meet if you all want too, but mostly this is a simplier way of letting everyone have a say. It has it's flaws, the biggest because I've wrote all this, so sorry for not asking you all before hand, but some of these issues need to be dealt with quickly. This first meeting will help establish the basic things we need to clear up about the EC – where the HQ is, the President of the EC, who is allowed to enter etc. Most of the time when other meetings are called it will be due to a serious situation, and we have a couple of those on our hands currently.
Each member nation receives one vote, either of yes or no, or for one option. They may suggest another option in some cases and vote for that. For this voting session Associate Members will not be allowed to vote pending the vote on proposition number #6. IF a member nation has another proposal they wish to put forward that is urgent, please say. Sorry for taking charge and not giving people more of a chance, however if it’s a small issue and can wait, leave it, though if you want to bring something up I’ll end it to the list of EC proposals. This is only the first meeting, and you’ll all get chances to forward proposals.
EC Proposal List:
#1) Recently The Union of Greater Europe, a non-European Community member, has launched an unprecedented and unwarranted attack on a fellow European nation, and non-EC member, the Czech Republic. The EC is a free and equal organization, so could all vote for one of the following suggestions:
a) launch defensive campaign in the Czech Republic to help defend it from the invasion (EC member nations will have to donate a strong force, weapons or money to the Czech’s)
b) place economic stations on the Union of Greater Europe and use soft powers heavily in order to pressure it into ceasing attacks, such as the halting of trade and closing of waters
c) recognize The Union of Greater Europe as the rightful rulers of the Czech Republic
d) take other course of action (please suggest)
#2) Three new members have desired to join, they are The Kingdom of Donaghadee, New Brittonia and Waldenburg 2. One objection has been made to New Brittonia joining due to the impending war he faces in the North American land of Greenland. Please cast your vote yes or no to each member joining. You may abstain if you wish, though it’s not so helpful. If it is a draw, and no objections are made, the person will enter.
#3) Two cities so far have been put forward for the HQ of the European Community. One is Brussels, the other Luxembourg. However, for a further few days you can put forward cities for the vote, which will be by poll.
#4) Currently no candidates for President of the European Community have been put forward. If you wish to put a candidate forward, follow these simply steps:
Name:
Age:
Previous Important Roles:
Brief Bio:
Each President will serve a one year term before he is replaced. The President must not be affiliated at the time of employment with an EC nation’s government. His jobs will include administering the laws, meetings and foreign policy of the EC, and assisting in deciding on the final outcome of resolutions which are passed by the EC members. (OOC: The President must be strictly neutral really. However, the person who puts forward that character will RP the President, and therefore much of the meetings, if they win.)
#5) The European Community is not a governing body. All member nations operate their own foreign policies. However, at times the EC will have to work as a united powerful bloc in order to be heard. This is a general question – generally speaking, which way you would prefer the EC foreign policy, when in these situations when it must act as a united bloc, to favour:
a) Isolationism – to concentrate on Europe’s affairs mostly, which will make sure that the alliance we have is mostly defensive in nation, and keeps to the primary goal of protecting Europe from outside attacks, whilst remaining quiet but sometimes forceful on the international stage. Pursue relations with non-Euro states, but will leave it mostly up to the member states to do so for themselves. Soft powers (diplomacy) used mostly.
b) Accessibility – this will likely increase the power projection of the EC, making it a more feared group of nations. However, it will also likely make the world more unstable, particular with other alliances vying for power. By going down this route the threat of military intervention may be used regularly in order to “get our own way” and hard powers used (invasions for land expansion, defending nations from others etc.). We will also try and create stronger relations with nations outside of Europe. Some of the core values of the EC may have to be changed. A mixture of hard (military intervention) and soft powers used, but far more willing to be aggressive.
#6) Should Associate Members, currently just observers to meetings, who only receive some of the benefits of the EC for some of the commitment (they sign an NAP instead of a MDP), be allowed to vote on all proposals, just ones that effect them directly if that occurs, or none? Vote yes for which of the three options you prefer, or suggestion another.
Yes:
For Proposals That Effect Them Directly:
Not At All: