NationStates Jolt Archive


The United Protection Alliance

Greal
14-06-2007, 06:22
The United Protection Alliance



Introduction

The purpose of this alliance is to promote peace to the world.



Terms of Admittance

1. Any nation is allowed to join the UPA.
2. Every nation that joins has to donate 0.03% of their GDP.
3. All nations in the UPA are bound by a Defensive Pact.
4. no alliance members may attack each other, if you feel threatened by another member, take with the Security Council of this alliance.
5. Chemical and Biological weapons are banned from being in a member's armouries.
6. Members are asked not to attack a enemy with a ICBMs or orbital-based weaponry, unless a enemy nation attacks your nation with ICBMs and orbital-based weaponry. UPA Inspectors from each member are asked to inspect each member's nukes for saftey resaons.
7. Every 3 months the UPA members are asked to vote for a new UPA President.
8. All member nations are asked to send their delegates to meet yearly at a capital city anounced at this thread.
9. Any member can propose to remove a member, which has to be aproved by the members.




Security Council
1.The UPA Security Council meets every 3 weeks at a secret location the president gives them.
2. Sanctions can only be approved by the the UPA Security Council.




The UPA President's Powers


1.The UPA President has the power to choose UPA Security Council members and also has the power to approve sanctions, and military action.
2.The president is allowed to declare a emergency meeting of the Security Council.
3. The UPA president has the power to ban a member, but the UPA has to vote on it first.



Next meeting: Zoingo's captial city.



President
Greal (Acting Preisdent)

Vice President
Zoingo (Acting Vice President)


Security Council members
Greal
Leocardia
Zoingo



Members.
Greal
Leocardia
Czechomany
Zoingo
Cazelia
One World Alliance
Lord Sumguy
14-06-2007, 06:29
OOC: this seems strangely similar to the Hegemony :P
Greal
14-06-2007, 06:30
OOC:not really, I got the idea of the president from a different alliance, so Lord Sumguy, are you in?
Lord Sumguy
14-06-2007, 06:32
OOC: I dont think so. As leader of the Hegemony i can answer to no authority but the Hegemony council, but i do endorse and support this alliance.
Greal
14-06-2007, 06:33
OOC: I dont think so. As leader of the Hegemony i can answer to no authority but the Hegemony council, but i do endorse and support this alliance.


OOC:I didn't know that there was a Hegemony council.
Lord Sumguy
14-06-2007, 06:37
I didn't know that there was a Hegemony council.

OOC: the council is made up of all Hegemony nations, and can reverse the Hegemon's decisions through a vote by 2/3rds majority.
Greal
14-06-2007, 06:40
OOC:same here, instead the Security Council only has 5 members.
Leocardia
14-06-2007, 08:41
Leocardia wants to join, as well as the security council.
Greal
14-06-2007, 08:42
Leocardia wants to join, as well as the security council.


Welcome to the UPA!
Leocardia
14-06-2007, 08:57
Welcome to the UPA!

Thanks, and I would like to donate 15,000 soldiers in the UPA Peacekeeping force.
Greal
14-06-2007, 08:59
good, UPA is also creating a UPA red cross.
Leocardia
14-06-2007, 09:01
good, UPA is also creating a UPA red cross.

Then I will donate 1,000 Senior doctors too.

I need to train my citizens and soldiers to gain experience.
Greal
14-06-2007, 09:04
Then I will donate 1,000 Senior doctors too.

I need to train my citizens and soldiers to gain experience.



telegramed you.
Pan-Arab Barronia
14-06-2007, 14:26
http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/2450/cdawuploadablefg2.pnghttp://img524.imageshack.us/img524/6107/foreignaffairsuploadablku2.png

We would like to join this Alliance, however, we do have some concerns:

The lack of a full and comprehensive charter
Nuclear weapons can make an effective first-strike weapon. A request that members do not use them unless in a retaliatory fashion will, in the majority of cases, not be heeded. Furthermore, the term "nuclear bomb" is an outdated term, and the use of ICBMs and orbital-based weaponry would be used. Very few nations we believe use the traditional iron bomb for nuclear weapons any more, and the term should be adjusted as such.
Members showing hostilities of each other should be encouraged to bring the debate to the table with Security Council members, rather than behind-the-back telegramming. Members should be entirely open with the Alliance.
Alliances built to prevent wars will inevitably be attacked and falter themselves - such a task as preventing war between nations is impossible to say the least, lest all nations be turned into the proverbial glass-lined crater. Such an alliance as to prevent wars between nations will end up despised by the international community, rendering it's members more vulnerable to attack by other nations. We would suggest that this objective be removed from the UPA.
We would suggest that the amount each nation gives be proportionate to their GDP. For a nation of 5 million, 1 billion can seem a large amount of money. However, for a 5 billion nation like ourselves, 1 billion is the sort we have lying around.


We hope you will address these concerns, before we make our final decision.

PAB Foreign Affairs, on behalf of The PAB Council for Defense and Warfare
Greal
15-06-2007, 22:56
http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/2450/cdawuploadablefg2.pnghttp://img524.imageshack.us/img524/6107/foreignaffairsuploadablku2.png

We would like to join this Alliance, however, we do have some concerns:

The lack of a full and comprehensive charter
Nuclear weapons can make an effective first-strike weapon. A request that members do not use them unless in a retaliatory fashion will, in the majority of cases, not be heeded. Furthermore, the term "nuclear bomb" is an outdated term, and the use of ICBMs and orbital-based weaponry would be used. Very few nations we believe use the traditional iron bomb for nuclear weapons any more, and the term should be adjusted as such.
Members showing hostilities of each other should be encouraged to bring the debate to the table with Security Council members, rather than behind-the-back telegramming. Members should be entirely open with the Alliance.
Alliances built to prevent wars will inevitably be attacked and falter themselves - such a task as preventing war between nations is impossible to say the least, lest all nations be turned into the proverbial glass-lined crater. Such an alliance as to prevent wars between nations will end up despised by the international community, rendering it's members more vulnerable to attack by other nations. We would suggest that this objective be removed from the UPA.
We would suggest that the amount each nation gives be proportionate to their GDP. For a nation of 5 million, 1 billion can seem a large amount of money. However, for a 5 billion nation like ourselves, 1 billion is the sort we have lying around.


We hope you will address these concerns, before we make our final decision.

PAB Foreign Affairs, on behalf of The PAB Council for Defense and Warfare


okay, we will change the charter.



OOC:sorry, didn't have time to change it.
Czechomany
15-06-2007, 23:26
I would like to join.. Im new sooo... I will donate 100 of my M7 Assault Handguns.. And 50 troops.. Oh and I have 1 senior doctor that I can donate!
Greal
16-06-2007, 03:04
Welcome to the Aliance Czechomany.
The PeoplesFreedom
16-06-2007, 03:11
New Prussian Empire Condemnation
The NPE condemns this alliance for its blatant-support of the evil that is communism. We urge no government to join.
Pan-Arab Barronia
16-06-2007, 03:11
OOC: Support of communism? Where? Nothing wrong with communism...we're actually a rather lefty country ourselves...
The PeoplesFreedom
16-06-2007, 03:15
OOC: Anti-communism? Where?

OOC: The NPE defines anti-communism.
Pan-Arab Barronia
16-06-2007, 03:16
OOC: The NPE defines anti-communism.

Apologies, that's edited. Misread your post.
Lord Sumguy
16-06-2007, 03:17
The Hegemon Lord Sumguy proposes a mutual protection pact and free trade agreement between the Hegemony and the UPA, as our goals are similar, and we share several member states.
Greal
16-06-2007, 03:18
New Prussian Empire Condemnation
The NPE condemns this alliance for its blatant-support of the evil that is communism. We urge no government to join.

we do not support communism, even my country has elections! (In cities)
Greal
16-06-2007, 03:19
The Hegemon Lord Sumguy proposes a mutual protection pact and free trade agreement between the Hegemony and the UPA, as our goals are similar, and we share several member states.

sure, I'll discuss it with the securtiy Council.
The PeoplesFreedom
16-06-2007, 03:20
we do not support communism, even my country has elections! (In cities)

OOC: Your in the SOL.
Greal
16-06-2007, 03:21
OOC: Your in the SOL.


it was a agreement between me and NC.
Greal
16-06-2007, 03:22
OOC: Your in the SOL.

OOC: It was a agreement between me and NC. I couldn't get any allies.
Pan-Arab Barronia
16-06-2007, 03:23
OOC: Your in the SOL.

*splutter* What? The SOL? This changes things...
Greal
16-06-2007, 03:26
*splutter* What? The SOL? This changes things...



I had too, most of my allies were in SOL.
Pan-Arab Barronia
16-06-2007, 03:29
I had too, most of my allies were in SOL.

One of my allies erupted into civil war, and ended up having the majority of his nation gassed by another ally of mine. Doesn't mean I'm planning to do the same. :p
Lord Sumguy
16-06-2007, 03:31
He could just leave the SOL....
Zoingo
16-06-2007, 20:10
Zoingo will join however, we have a request:

Zoingo would like to host the meetings in our capital.
Zoingo
16-06-2007, 20:23
OOC: Your in the SOL.

1st off, the SOL is for protection purposes only (alliance). 2nd, Im a democracy that is in this alliance, and I don't support communism. Communism is frowned upon in my society severly.
Cazelia
16-06-2007, 20:32
we wish to join this alliance in name of beter diplomatic relations between all UPA nations and the IDN.

signed,
President Jonathan R Hasley
Greal
16-06-2007, 22:46
welcome Zoingo and Cazelia! Zoingo, we hold meetings around the world, so we can start with your capital city.
One World Alliance
16-06-2007, 23:10
I would like to join the UPA
Greal
16-06-2007, 23:12
I would like to join the UPA


Welcome One World Alliance!
Leocardia
17-06-2007, 09:39
bump
Leocardia
17-06-2007, 09:39
1st off, the SOL is for protection purposes only (alliance). 2nd, Im a democracy that is in this alliance, and I don't support communism. Communism is frowned upon in my society severly.

Then you'll have a problem with my country.
Jenrak
18-06-2007, 15:38
OOC: This alliance looks interesting, and I'll be more than happy to join if only you guys were a bit more lenient on chemical and bio weapons.
Emporer Pudu
18-06-2007, 15:47
we do not support communism, even my country has elections! (In cities)

OOC: You know having elections has nothing to do with being communist or not?
Greal
19-06-2007, 02:31
OOC: This alliance looks interesting, and I'll be more than happy to join if only you guys were a bit more lenient on chemical and bio weapons.

maybe I should ban chemcial weapons.
Jenrak
20-06-2007, 02:00
maybe I should ban chemcial weapons.

OOC: Sounds very spiteful.
Grosse Reich
22-06-2007, 12:06
OOC: I need to find a good alliance to apply for membership in. The UPA sounds interesting, but what's this about SOL? What's SOL?
Greal
22-06-2007, 22:14
OOC: SOL is Sons of Lenin.
Pengina von Got
22-06-2007, 22:30
the people of Pengina von Got feel that this is simply an imitation of th United Nations and urges other countries to help strengthen and reform our current UN rather than join a smaller copycat.