NationStates Jolt Archive

Бронированный Курьер Человека-Tyazhelyy (Armoured Transporter–Heavy)
http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/7775/apctdo3.png
A with 22nd Mechanized Infantry Markings.

Specifications

Weight: 13.5 Tonnes

Length: 7 Meters (Not including main gun)

Width: 2.91 Meters

Height: 2.35 Meters

Crew: 10(Driver,Commander, Gunner, + 5 Troops)

Place of Origin: The Republic of Czechalrus

Current Operators: The Republic of Czechalrus, The Republic of Nuevo Italia, The United Socialist States of Wagdog, The Czechalrus Federation, The Holy Democracy of The Norlands


Conflicts Involved: None

Armor

Type: Layered Steel

Thickness: Classified

Armament

Primary: 2A70 100mm Gun/Launcher

Secondary: 2A72 30mm Auto Cannon, 4 Firing Ports

Ammunition Stowage

Primary: 25 Rounds

Secondary: 700 Rounds

Powerplant

Engine: Nechnav Diesel UTD-88 (379 HP)

Suspension: Wheeled 6x6

Range: 472 Miles

Speed: 54 mph (Road), 3.7 mph (swimming)

Price:$700,000

*Thumbs up*

Nice lineart!

I would buy some, but I already have a standard APC/IFV.

It still rawks though.

Thank you for your complements!

Very nice indeed. I'll soon be ordering some for my mechanized cavalry as a standard recon APC/tank destroyer. To round out the БКЧ line though, might a version of this with the 2S31 Vena SP combination gun turret be doable? At present I have to use 122mm D30s as makeshift "infantry guns" to obtain the desired hybrid of mortar and antitank gun perfromance my battalions require. But with an assault gun version of the БКЧ around, something much more mobile and suitable would be usable instead.

Very nice indeed. I'll soon be ordering some for my mechanized cavalry as a standard recon APC/tank destroyer. To round out the БКЧ line though, might a version of this with the 2S31 Vena SP combination gun turret be doable? At present I have to use 122mm D30s as makeshift "infantry guns" to obtain the desired hybrid of mortar and antitank gun perfromance my battalions require. But with an assault gun version of the БКЧ around, something much more mobile and suitable would be usable instead.

This could be done, with strengthing of the chassis and relocating the turrent to the center to balance it out. He might also add spades to help dealing with the recoil of the artillery. I will have my engineers get to work.

This could be done, with strengthing of the chassis and relocating the turrent to the center to balance it out. He might also add spades to help dealing with the recoil of the artillery. I will have my engineers get to work.
Super.:cool: Spades are probably great since although some fire-on-the-move capability would be desirable if this were forced into the antitank role, it'd mostly be used for indirect fire so one shouldn't be too choosy if that would mean jeopardizing crew safety for an optional feature.
I'm about to place my first order for the regular version anyway at TWSP's store. How's this for the new variant's name: Бронированый Курьер Человека-Самоходная Установка (БКЧ-СУ), or "Armored Personnel Carrier-Assault Gun," eh?;)

That a good name, I will probably use it.