NationStates Jolt Archive

The Bosivian Juggernaut tank is a model of a much older ww2 German tank.But fitted with a 200mm cannon.It also includes Two editional state of the art Ip-50MGs that fire at a rate of 2,000rpm.Its armer has also been updated.Too an newly dicovered flexeble steel making it a match for RPGs or even other modern tank to take on.

OK, this'll be my only reply to this topic, as I've noticed you make a new thread for every tank you have. (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=508197)


Your threads are too short
Your tanks lack detail
You only use each thread once


Those are BAD things to do.

Unless you plan on making a revolutionary tank that you want discussion over, put all your weapons onto one thread and index them... (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=489651)

If you do make a tank that you have poured your heart and soul into, then post every detail you can, these normally wind up in specialty off-site draftroom threads (http://z13.invisionfree.com/The_NS_Draftroom/index.php?act=idx).

(As for your 'Jug' I've got the HTA-108...)
HTA-108 203 mm SP Assault gun
(yeah, an improved HTC-108 that can duel HBTs... based on HT-106 chassis...)
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/203mm-DDST8606676_JPG.jpg

Replacing the HTC-108, due to its lack of high angle fire, the HTA-108 is a vast improvement.

Based on the more solid chassis of the HT-106 (http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=10753855&postcount=9), rather than the HT-101, it is now better able to cope with the massive recoil.

It was also given a rear spade, in addition to a front spade, side bracing arms may also be deployed, allowing 360 degrees of low angle fire (up to 30 degrees from horizontal), or 30 degree traverse at high angle fire (up to 85 degrees from horizontal).

Specifications are the same as that carried by the HT-106, except price, which is now 15 million for a full HTA-108.

Optional open rear turret available for another 2 to 5 million (raises CG deflects small arms or small cannon fire to full sized tank rounds, depending on grade [ low, high or MBT grade])

Carries 15 shells...
Or 5 shells and an additional barrel extension for "artillery/tank sniping".
Operates with a crew of 6...
Wieghs 35 tons at entry level...
It can throw a shell over 25 miles/55 Km...
A battery with 5 of these can land 45 shells in a minute (firing at 3 rds/min per gun, 3 trajectories)

The gun can be fred with spade raised, but accuraxcy will most likely suffer (along with safety, but wiegh that against getting perferated by an enemy 203 mm shell...)

XHT-201D is still in development but lets put it this way.

Its got 3 203mm Recoilless Rifles. Thats right, 3 guns.

XHT-201D is still in development but lets put it this way.

Its got 3 203mm Recoilless Rifles. Thats right, 2 guns.

Click the quote and look at the design being developed below it...

(HT peffix used to mean "Hurtian Tank", HTC [Cannon]=Hurtian Artillery Tank HTA [assault]=Hurtian Assault Tank)

So now you are making "Experimental Hurtian Tanks"?

I suggest the German (WW2) method of designating weapons 'borrowed' from foriegners.

[You nations weapon type designation prefix]-[Number descriptive of weopn properties]-[Nation of origin Suffix]
xIFV-201 (H)

CM-26 chambered for 6.5 x 55 = MG-65055 (H) or CFR-26 (H)

Click the quote and look at the design being developed below it...

(HT peffix used to mean "Hurtian Tank", HTC [Cannon]=Hurtian Artillery Tank HTA [assault]=Hurtian Assault Tank)

So now you are making "Experimental Hurtian Tanks"?

I suggest the German (WW2) method of designating weapons 'borrowed' from foriegners.

[You nations weapon type designation prefix]-[Number descriptive of weopn properties]-[Nation of origin Suffix]
xIFV-201 (H)

CM-26 chambered for 6.5 x 55 = MG-65055 (H) or CFR-26 (H)

Welcome to the beautiful world of people have different classification systems than you. Like some call it Pocket Battleships and I prefer Battlecruisers or Heavy Cruiser depending on how thick the main belt is.

Then there is Pocket Superdreadnought and I prefer the team Dreadnought. Semantics.

Welcome to the beautiful world of people have different classification systems than you. Like some call it Pocket Battleships and I prefer Battlecruisers or Heavy Cruiser depending on how thick the main belt is.

Then there is Pocket Superdreadnought and I prefer the team Dreadnought. Semantics.

yep, but now we have two HT-201's, mine, and yours, and even though both can be called APCs, they are different vehicles, since your xHT-201 sounds more like my HT-301 which I've pre-developed for when I decide to go all PMT on the NS universe...