NationStates Jolt Archive

Carmina Gadalica-In a milestone case of Koizumi v. The Republic, the Suprem Court ruled any and all Gay/Lesiban Couples, may adopt children.

While samesex marraige has been legal for two decades now, adoption wasn't premitted. In a similar case (Rogers v. The Republic) nearly 20 years ago, the Supreme Court ruled that Homosexuals can not adpot children. Now they have finally had their day in the court, and won.

"This is very exciting." Says Mako Izumi, "Now I can finally raise a son like i've always dreamed."

Many are a little suprised by Cheif Justice Junichiro Yoshida decision. The fiercely conservative judge is the one who outlawed abortion, and kept the outlaw on drugs/alchol.

"I though about it very carefully, and I thought about my belifes. Then I relized Kanami is a land of Freedom. So why shouldn't same sex partners be allowed to adopt?

Prime Minister Romeny will sign the bill into law, this saturday.

Kubra is quite happy that those poor orphans can finally get ohmes. when we opened up same sex adoption our orphan populaton dropped significantly. Well, now it's nearly gone what with abortion.

The Emperor of the Secular Empire of Maraque applauds the actions of the Supreme Court of Kanami and believes the right decision was made. The Emperor is extremely happy to hear the news.

To Prime Minister Romeny
I would suggest rethinking this move. Perverts who take children into their homes will further the corruption within your society and will ultamately lead to destruction. Those innocent souls up for adoption will be destroyed by brain washing and child abuse, and within time will meld to be little better than the homosexuals. If you feel the situation is out of your hand and it is too late to go back, then Frozopia is willing to offer military assistance should you wish to destroy the power held by the perverted.

Signed President Roland of Frozopia

E.S. Applauds the decision, but urges the Prime Minister to take some percautions. Enough to ensure the child's safty, and not supress the rights of others.

King Ludokai XVI

Prime Minister Romeny has added annexations to the Suprem Court Decision. For the benifit of the child, and the rights of the Gay/Lesbian Community.

1. Social Services will monotor

2. Background checks will be used when adoption (as are all adoptions)

3. Children should be taught hetrosexualism, and it's values. Once A child reaches the age of teens or adults, they can chose their sexual prefrence. Homosexualiy should not be forced on a child.

4. Special Attention will be taugt about the risks of Same Sex Marriage. (AIDS HIV etc)

Prime Minister Romeny has added annexations to the Suprem Court Decision. For the benifit of the child, and the rights of the Gay/Lesbian Community.

1. Social Services will monotor

2. Background checks will be used when adoption (as are all adoptions)

3. Children should be taught hetrosexualism, and it's values. Once A child reaches the age of teens or adults, they can chose their sexual prefrence. Homosexualiy should not be forced on a child.

4. Special Attention will be taugt about the risks of Same Sex Marriage. (AIDS HIV etc)

OOC: Wow. Wait to cheapen what you've just done. First, is AIDS, HIV, etc any more likely than in hetero relations? Second, teaching a sexuality is just kind of... well... need I say more? Finally, I don't think that Social Services should monitor gays/lesbians with adopted children anymore than Hetero couples with adopted (or not) children.

The Raj would like to make these points-

1. Sexual infection is more likely in same-sex couples.
2. A child should not be 'taught' any sexual preference, in fact, 'heterosexualism' is forced upon children much more often by homophobic parents.
If heterosexual parents can create a homosexual child, why can't homosexual parents create a heterosexual child?
Parents' sexuality really has nothing to do with child's sexuality.

Honours to your house.
Mashallah.

The Imperial Empire condemns this court decision.
Although the Imperial government is secular, homosexuals should have the right to raise children.
This is a blight on your nation .

The Raj would like to make these points-

1. Sexual infection is more likely in same-sex couples.
2. A child should not be 'taught' any sexual preference, in fact, 'heterosexualism' is forced upon children much more often by homophobic parents.
If heterosexual parents can create a homosexual child, why can't homosexual parents create a heterosexual child?
Parents' sexuality really has nothing to do with child's sexuality.

Honours to your house.
Mashallah.

I dunno, but when I hear of a boy named "precious," as was the case at an all gay school in NY, I can't help but think he'll grow up to be gay.

The Secular Empire of Maraque extends a condemnation of the Prime Ministers blatant attempts at passing discrimination into the bill that is intended for a good cause.

Forcing the teaching of "hetrosexualism" to children of homosexual couples is blatant discrimination that implies that because the child is in a homosexual household that the child itself will become gay.

Then there is the mention of when they'll be able to "choose" their sexual preference; this is false. No one chooses to be heterosexual, and no one chooses to be homosexual. Once they reach this age, nothing will change... they'll still be either heterosexual or homosexual since the day they were born. Regardless of whether or not they grow up in a homosexual or heterosexual household.

IF we may come in defense of the Kanami, against Marque's condmenations:

The deals aren't as oppressive as you might see them. Compared to a lot of nations, these are pretty lax. I'm willing to bet Kanami, being a Socialist Nation, has Social Services involved in hetero couples, as well as homo.

E.S. respected Psychologist Simon Camdem belives a child does have the knowledge and the right to chose. To quote him: "To many people belive the child is a puppet vessel. No one aknowledges they have minds and intelligence to make up their own mind." Therefore, if you teach a child all the aspects of such, then they can make up their own minds. Indeed they are influenced, but the influence can. Most experts in E.S. Belive homosexuality is a choice, not a disease, or a genetic factor like depression. People chose their sexual prefrence just as they chose their food. It never says it will force the belife of heterosexualism on a child, but teach them about it. Point out where it says "We will force a child to learn heterosexualism." It says children should be taught, breaking that down, it looks to me, it should be taught in addition. If no one is taught about diffrent sex, the entire society would break down.

AIDS being a global crises as it is, do you want to continue the graphic spread? HIV/AIDS is proven to be more common in Same Sex Intamacy than in Hetero.

Sex Ed is commonly taught anyway. Mostly reserved for older crowds, clearly, so where is the problem? It's not stating to teach young child all the aspects of sex, and how it works.

"It is being forced upon the child. The child should not have to be taught heterosexualism. Just as a child should not have to be taught homosexualism. It is blatant discrimination to make children have to learn the "values" of one, and not both. That's imposing one biased view upon the child, in a weak attempt to make sure the child chooses the one that it is being taught, and that... is heterosexualism.

Homosexuality is not a choice. No matter what you may think, it is not. No one goes to sleep gay and wakes up straight. So why would someone go to sleep straight, and wake up gay? No one does. Just because you're not attracted to the same sex, doesn't mean others who are, chose to feel that way. You can't choose what you're attracted to. Force yourself to like a male... hard, isn't it?

On the subject of HIV/AIDS: No. It is not more common in same-sex relations. More heterosexuals have the virus than homosexuals. A high number of homosexuals have the virus, yes, but as a whole... no. Heterosexuals have the most cases. Do your research.

And once again... teaching heterosexualism into a child is not needed. Heterosexualism is all around them, in their daily lives, at school, at work, everywhere they go. They will realize this is the "traditional" lifestyle in due time, and their parents surely won't neglect to tell their children that yes, having two mommies/daddies isn't the norm in most societies. It shouldn't be up to the government to dictate this."