what would be the most damaging terror attack?
what would be the most damaging terror attack?
Amazonian Beasts
24-03-2006, 04:11
Should this be in II?
I said Bio attack, nonetheless.
A chemical attack. If that happened, Hollywood would be worst (due to all the popularity. It would tak ehuge toll on the economy in temrs of movies and stuff)
Ramissle
24-03-2006, 04:13
Super Bowl. Or Game 7 of the World Series.
Depends on the objective. Do you want loss of life, property damage or just plain fear? For the first, a nuke would do the best if you don't want to frag half the planet, while a bio attack is great if you don't give a damn about collateral damage. For property damage, nukes, chemical spills off the coast, and wide spread bombings do wonders. For fear, bioweapons pull into the lead again, with nukes and bombing campaigns right behind.
Amazonian Beasts
24-03-2006, 04:14
Super Bowl. Or Game 7 of the World Series.
Super Bowl has more people.
me thinks hitting oil refineries for the US or most nations for that matter, or any oil type thing...
The Gate Builders
24-03-2006, 04:21
I have a secret wapon. 100% original.
BROWN NOISE. Horrible for morale, bad for sanitation.
The Beltway
24-03-2006, 04:24
How about taking over two planes, dispersing biological agents from the planes, releasing chemical agents in the airport before boarding, flying one plane into a supertanker and thus sinking it, and then flying the other into a nuclear reactor? Oh, and one last terrorist uses a suitcase nuke. There!
i should have put other.
Yup. Or...
How about taking over two planes, dispersing biological agents from the planes, releasing chemical agents in the airport before boarding, flying one plane into a supertanker and thus sinking it, and then flying the other into a nuclear reactor? Oh, and one last terrorist uses a suitcase nuke. There!