NationStates Jolt Archive


Joint missile developement thread(ATTN DMG)

Willink
04-02-2006, 22:05
This will be the brainstorming/planning thread for a Air or Surface launched missile, which can attack planes, Ships, and ground targets.

Suggestions and comments are encoraged, but the development is closed to other people wanting to join in the Developement.


Size: N/A

Materials- Osmium-Iridium-Solid Aerogel based metal, with Platinum and Nano-Metal(Absorbs Radar and IR pulses) filling layers. Armored Uranium tip with Armor Eating Nano Metals.

Fuel Cell- Experimental Electronic fuel cell, with Nanotube based material included.

Engine: Scramjet, in experimental stages, Hypothetical top speed mach 7.

Guidance system- C.E.P/IR/HEAT, Nano Miniturization

{Reserved for missile stats}
DMG
04-02-2006, 22:08
Tag
No_State_At_All
04-02-2006, 23:59
OOC: TAG. and i'll aim you at the rapier (http://www.army.mod.uk/equipment/aad/aad_rfsc.htm) system in UK service in case that helps.
DMG
05-02-2006, 05:42
OOC: TAG. and i'll aim you at the rapier (http://www.army.mod.uk/equipment/aad/aad_rfsc.htm) system in UK service in case that helps.

I am not sure how much help that is, the Rapier is much different than our quick brainstorms.
No_State_At_All
05-02-2006, 14:05
fair enough. how about the Sea Dart (http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/static/pages/1990.html) then. that page is poor, but its the best the MOD have to offer on it, i think.
DMG
05-02-2006, 16:00
fair enough. how about the Sea Dart (http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/static/pages/1990.html) then. that page is poor, but its the best the MOD have to offer on it, i think.

Thanks your help, but we don't really need a RL missile - there aren't any that are going to be like ours anyway.
No_State_At_All
05-02-2006, 17:14
oh well. sorry to spam your thread a bit... [leaves]
DMG
07-02-2006, 04:38
oh well. sorry to spam your thread a bit... [leaves]

No problem.

@Willink: Any response from Omz?
Willink
16-02-2006, 01:26
Here is the first official information on the missile, still in the early development stages.

http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/4471/jointmissile9zj.png
The Macabees
16-02-2006, 01:27
Do you guys take criticism, or no?
DMG
16-02-2006, 01:29
Do you guys take criticism, or no?

From you? Sure.
Risban
16-02-2006, 01:57
The Grand Imperium of Risban's Imperial Ministry for Technology and Advancement, as well as the Scorpius Corporation, would be more than happy to throw an outrageous amount of funding to this project.
DMG
16-02-2006, 02:01
The Grand Imperium of Risban's Imperial Ministry for Technology and Advancement, as well as the Scorpius Corporation, would be more than happy to throw an outrageous amount of funding to this project.

On behalf of both our nations, I accept your generous offer to help funding our project.

-Mar'ki Ticron
CEO of DMI
Willink
16-02-2006, 02:05
OOC-Hold on Risban, im sending you a TG
The Macabees
16-02-2006, 02:15
Well, what kind of fuel cells are those, and why do you have them? As for the scramjet engine, what altitude and at what velocity will this missile be operating at? What's the point of the 'safe mode'on the EMP? You can release the pulse on command. Why have EMP at all? Especially on what seems like an armour piercing missile. The guidance computers can't be totally protected against the EMP blast since it has to have some sort of connection to whatever is guiding the computer, which can't be EMP hardened because it has to transmit and receive, and if it's hardened it won't be able to do that. Regardless, when is this EMP designed to be pulsed? Depending on the time my previous point is irrelevent. Why put the high explosive behind the EMP, guidance, et cetera? It will just ruin everything in front of it, although if the missile hits everything in front of it will be ruined anyways, so it's irrelevent - however, if the EMP is pulsed before the missile hits you have a good chance of rendering the high explosive worthless. And why the joystick control? This is most likely a beyond visual range missile, meaning the pilot or whatever is guiding it won't be able to see it, and if it's over the horizon radar won't be able to track it - only satellite, while you may not always have a satellite over the area to service the technology. That said, why not let it be a fire and forget? Ah, now that I see it has a maximum range of 35kms.

That said, I guess my argument can be irrelevent if the missile is for another purpose than I originally thought. What is the purpose of this missile?
DMG
16-02-2006, 02:19
Many of your questions will be answered when we actually finish the missile and put up the details on it. The pic was just a quick preliminiary thing - a jotting down of notes.

As for a couple of your questions, I will defer to Willink.
Willink
16-02-2006, 02:20
Well, what kind of fuel cells are those, and why do you have them? As for the scramjet engine, what altitude and at what velocity will this missile be operating at? What's the point of the 'safe mode'on the EMP? You can release the pulse on command. Why have EMP at all? Especially on what seems like an armour piercing missile. The guidance computers can't be totally protected against the EMP blast since it has to have some sort of connection to whatever is guiding the computer, which can't be EMP hardened because it has to transmit and receive, and if it's hardened it won't be able to do that. Regardless, when is this EMP designed to be pulsed? Depending on the time my previous point is irrelevent. Why put the high explosive behind the EMP, guidance, et cetera? It will just ruin everything in front of it, although if the missile hits everything in front of it will be ruined anyways, so it's irrelevent - however, if the EMP is pulsed before the missile hits you have a good chance of rendering the high explosive worthless. And why the joystick control? This is most likely a beyond visual range missile, meaning the pilot or whatever is guiding it won't be able to see it, and if it's over the horizon radar won't be able to track it - only satellite, while you may not always have a satellite over the area to service the technology. That said, why not let it be a fire and forget? Ah, now that I see it has a maximum range of 35kms.

That said, I guess my argument can be irrelevent if the missile is for another purpose than I originally thought. What is the purpose of this missile?

Purpose wise, its an Multi-use missile, can be fired at Ships, planes, and ground targets, to the EMP, it is Not fitted with EMP, its "Safe mode" is to protect against EMP, as for things for the fuel cell and such, i really havnt though about it yet. :)
Willink
16-02-2006, 05:35
Port Arthur military athority, southeastern Saharistan

DMG and Willink military experts were on hand for the first test of the experimental missile, the X-25B. A TU-160 Took off from the Airfield, and climbed to around 60,000 feet over the southeastern coast. The pilot switched over to the experiment weapon testbed launcher, and prepared to fire the first of its 4 missiles. He grabbed the joystick, and launched the first missile.

But, something went wrong. The missile spun wildly toward the ground, before exploding just above 20,000 feet. One of the fins had been built improperly and had became detached following the launch.

The plane landed, and had the other 3 missiles checked out, all seemed ready to fire. It took off again, and flew back up to 60,000 feet. He prepared the 2nd missile, and fired it off. It rocketed off at mach 2, before taking full effect, hitting a top speed of Mach 6.1 on its first "Complete" test launch, flying over Willink territory in a matter of minutes, before its destructive fuse was detonated, blowing it apart in the sky over Halbagardian territory to the north.

The 3rd missile was fired, reaching mach 6.4 before its fuel cell malfunctioned and exploded. The 4th missile reached a top speed of mach 6.6 before being detonated.

It had proven a useful test, and gave the designers ideas on what the Scramjet/Ramjet hybrid engines capacities were.
DMG
16-02-2006, 22:42
DMI Headquarters - the Capitol

The researchers and engineers working on the new missile system have had great success in their preliminary experiments. Slight malfunctions and misdesigns were being corrected with each new test that is completed.

When the missile is finished, it is expected to be phased in as the main missile for all DMI and DMG systems - though it will not be sold any time in the near future.

Per unit cost estimates are currently around two million dollars a missile, which makes it one of the most expensive common use missiles used; though the results prove that the cost is well worth it...
Artitsa
17-02-2006, 01:55
The Government of Artitsa will donate 250 Billion USD to this project, while Hyland-Nikolaas Industries, the main Arms Manufactorer has promised to contribute upto $1 Trillion USD plus specialists to the project.
Lost Hills
17-02-2006, 02:05
Lost Hills Department of Defense
Office of Research and Development

Lost Hills R&D is very interested in supporting this project in anyway possible. We would be more than willing to either fund the development of send our own researchers to assist in any capacity. A preliminary estimate of $350 billion dollars yearly could be diverted to aid in development.
Prairie du sac
17-02-2006, 02:09
We would like to donate 30 billion USD to this project as it shows some promise in being a very good missle. The money is already sent but might there be any perks in donateing money?
Willink
17-02-2006, 02:43
To answer your question, no, not really any perks, exept your Countries name on the Credits and a discount on the price once it is exported, plus test and experiment reports.
Prairie du sac
17-02-2006, 02:55
the discount is enough. as that was what we were looking for.
Gejigrad
17-02-2006, 03:21
[ Sounds kind of like what you'd use against an airplane with naval armor.

Or something. With a uranium tip, that'd slow it down a bit, and where do you stick the infrared trackers? Or...do you have them? If not, this probably won't be good against aircraft unless you spam up the airspace with a lot--and I mean a LOT of these. ]
DMG
17-02-2006, 06:14
OOC: Willink, I think we have enough funds now. Trillions of dollars for a researching a single missile is certainly enough.
Lamehk
17-02-2006, 06:41
Care to explain how these Armor Eating Nano Metals and Nanotube based fuel cell materials work?

Is this meant to be MT or PMT?
DMG
17-02-2006, 06:44
All will be explained in time - when we actually finish the missile and make a write up or something detailing its inner workings.

It is an early PMT missile (2015 roughly).
Lamehk
17-02-2006, 06:52
Well i think you need to up the date quite alot if you plan on having armour eating nanometal - no earlier than mid to late PMT
Yallak
17-02-2006, 12:32
Tag (sorry subscription not working)
Artitsa
17-02-2006, 20:25
Well i think you need to up the date quite alot if you plan on having armour eating nanometal - no earlier than mid to late PMT

Thats a nice opinion, but I think we'll keep it 2015 based on research.
DMG
19-02-2006, 06:46
Guys, we are spending trillions of dollars on the research for this missile...