NationStates Jolt Archive

Imagine... if mass colonization had never ended, America never had a revolution, South America and Africa were never freed... I did imagine and I came up with this.. here's the scenario... Europe still owns 50% of the world, Russia is still imperialistic... Ottoman Empire, never fell... take it form their... You can tell most of the countries from the map below... I start by claiming the British Empire.... Any questions, AIM: Falcinator351

Palixia - Britain
Philanchez - Spain

http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/8953/imperlialjpeg1gy.jpg

Spain!

Go Spain!! ACCEPTED...

I have quarrels with your map...ill edit it and show you what it shoudl look like because you left off a lot of spains possesions

about what time frame would this be set in?

I believe this is more accurate as france didnt have all of western america and spanish florida was a lot bigger, also the spanish had control of the phillipines and i believe all of morrocco...

http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/840/anw4aw.th.gif (http://img219.imageshack.us/my.php?image=anw4aw.gif)

Totally agree with you on the Spanish territories.
that'd be great if it was bigger

The time frame will be sometime around October 6th, 2005... Also, I will update the map for the Spanish possesions... (Geez always making me work...)

Also, keep in mind that this isn't reality, but to better suite your needs I have made a new mappy
http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/59/imperlialjpeg9cu.jpg

Excellent, I'd like Imperial Russia then

Ah, very nice pick...

"With the 3rd pick in the 2005 Imperial Draft, Eastern Serbia has selected Imperial Russia"

im surprised noones taken france...

Why is the Congo Spanish? It was always a Belgian colony. Morocco was never fully Spanish; the French and Spanish joint control, but in reality Spain owned the Tangier strip and the Western Sahara, while the French owned the rest of Morocco.

is the ottomon empire taken???
if not then china

wait that was wrong
i go for Ottomans

i believe its because belgium doesnt exist...they are under dutch rule...also TOE and China are open...

Siam (modern day Thailand) was never under colonization, Egypt lybia(Libya) were both under Ottoman, if the ottomans didnt fall, i think they wouldv kept egypt and libya with them, that way Britian is only taking the deserts of egypt, and italy the deserts of Lybia, i dont think its logical... please reform the map logically...

thank you

http://img319.imageshack.us/my.php?image=threadmap1ix.gif
i think this map is more technical

Siam (modern day Thailand) was never under colonization, Egypt lybia(Libya) were both under Ottoman, if the ottomans didnt fall, i think they wouldv kept egypt and libya with them, that way Britian is only taking the deserts of egypt, and italy the deserts of Lybia, i dont think its logical... please reform the map logically...

thank you

Incorrect, Egypt received its autonomy during the Mamaluke uprising against Ottoman rule in the 18th century. The British never owned Egypt per say, instead, in the mid-18th century they made it a protectorate, and controlled it in all but name. The Ottoman Empire fell in 1921, not the late 18th century, so they lost both Lybia and Egypt long before the fall of the Empire.

but we are assumin that the Ottomans never lost against the british, and bever went out, right???

Yes, but the British never directly attacked the Ottomans for Egypt, they technically were belligerent against the Mamelukes, that had gained independence for Egypt from the Ottomans. If the Ottomans were to keep Egypt then the Mameluke uprising would have never happened.

How did Portugal get Suriname?

How did Portugal get Suriname?

If it's because of the union of the Netherlands and Belgium then the Congo should go to Portugal and Suriname to Spain, as dictated by the Treaty of Tordesillas - indeed, the church wrote it.

Yes, but the British never directly attacked the Ottomans for Egypt, they technically were belligerent against the Mamelukes, that had gained independence for Egypt from the Ottomans. If the Ottomans were to keep Egypt then the Mameluke uprising would have never happened.

fine fine , then the mameluks never upprose... if Egytp was out of the ottomans, then this means the start of the fall, and since Ottomans had Egypt befor the british then they are to have it...
and what about Siam.. was it ever colonized???

No, you were absolutely correct about Siam; it was always independent.

I lay claim to...The Russian Empire.

too late

D'OH! Then I guess...The French Empire. (can I like make up a few hypotheticals about the French revolution or do I have to have Bourbons?

Sweden

If Japan is still open, I'd like it.

and ethiopia, wasnt it under italian rule???

Ethiopia was independent until the Italian conquest in World War II, and that was only for a decade or so.

All of you are temporarily recognized untill Palix gets back.

All of you are temporarily recognized untill Palix gets back.
hunh *raises an eyebrow and top left lip*

Hun? and yes you read correectly. I have no real power in this but to insure that you get what you wanted you are recignized untill Palix gets back and makes his decision.

Hmm, Pilax still MIA?

PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! this map is not real-life, it is all fiction, don't go on each other throughts saying "HEY BLAHBERTIA BELONGS TO RANCE< SERINAME IS PORUFRENCISH" and all of you are accepted, if you their mess with thy holy map, you are benned from the great gig in the sky...

I liked the first map where Japan had the Phillipines :( Its going to be like David Vs Goliath if I go against my neighbors.

Then how about a Japan/Russia alliance

sure. Why not. I mean, I'm sure Russia would never break an alliance and invade. :P

I'll take The Netherlands off your hands, if you don't mind.

Damnit Palixia Wake Up!!!!!