Crazed Marines
01-10-2005, 03:34
CMN News
Today, the anti-gun lobby scored a big hit against gun rights in Crazed Marines. A case, served in the 9th Circuit Court in Iwo Jima, relued that excessively large firearms defined as Anti-Tank Rifles (ATRs) were not arms, but rather military hardware. The plaintiff, Mrs. J. A. Blomie, filed suit against a one Mr. John T. Reigger after her husband was killed by the defendant's ATR. Like 20% of CM homes, Mr. Reigger owned a CM99 model Anti-Tank Rifle amd shot Mr. Blomie after he found the Plaintiff's husband inside his Suribachi home. When the police arrived, there was a pair of legs severed below the knees, a puddle of blood around ten feet in diameter, Mr. Reigger and his CM99a covered in blood, and a very messy wall with a rather large hole in it. Mrs. Blomie claims that the use of this against her husband was "cruel and unusual punishment to both the late Mr. Blomie and his family." This sparks a large debate in Crazed Marines about what is a gun and what isn't. The rights of gunowners are protected in Article 6 of the Constitution which reads Firearms and blade weapons are described as such arms allowed.
However, with the excesive power in ATRs, some feel that this qualifies as an artillery piece and not a firearm. The appeal on this case is expoected to hit the Supreme Court tomorrow.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Foxtrot News
Thousands of protesters gathered outside Parris Island today to either show support for Mr. Reigger or Mrs. Blomie. The protesters met at the Capital Building today where some elements began to clash. Some foreign protesters have come into the country just to see CM disarm. However, these protesters were in for a suprise when some of the Pro-Gun crowd (who outnumbered the anti-gun crowd five to one) drew a gun and began firing into the midst. Nobody was killed, but fifty protesters were wounded and the foreigners arreste on immigration charges. As the Police could not legally break the crowd up until they witnessed such acts, the shooters were never captured...probably much to the chagrin of the Police who are overwhelmingly pro-gun.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Teuful Hounden News
A new anti-gun suit has just been filed after the picture of a seven-year-old girl carrying an AK-47 in the Baghdad reqion of Iraq was seen over the news wire. Jane Fondue, 97, of Iwo Jima said that the ability for minors to own and carry firearms in public was criminally negligent ans is suing the State for "this outrage" said Fondue. Many feel the photo (http://jccc.afis.osd.mil/LBOX/full/1239109.jpg) is just a sign that parents are doing the right thing. It was not reported, however, that the girl's father took the picture. He claims he was just behind her as he was taking her to go shooting that afternoon and thought she looked cute in that picture. This is the second gun lawsuit in as many days and many feel that the rights of the Citizens are under attack by the extreme left in CM.
Today, the anti-gun lobby scored a big hit against gun rights in Crazed Marines. A case, served in the 9th Circuit Court in Iwo Jima, relued that excessively large firearms defined as Anti-Tank Rifles (ATRs) were not arms, but rather military hardware. The plaintiff, Mrs. J. A. Blomie, filed suit against a one Mr. John T. Reigger after her husband was killed by the defendant's ATR. Like 20% of CM homes, Mr. Reigger owned a CM99 model Anti-Tank Rifle amd shot Mr. Blomie after he found the Plaintiff's husband inside his Suribachi home. When the police arrived, there was a pair of legs severed below the knees, a puddle of blood around ten feet in diameter, Mr. Reigger and his CM99a covered in blood, and a very messy wall with a rather large hole in it. Mrs. Blomie claims that the use of this against her husband was "cruel and unusual punishment to both the late Mr. Blomie and his family." This sparks a large debate in Crazed Marines about what is a gun and what isn't. The rights of gunowners are protected in Article 6 of the Constitution which reads Firearms and blade weapons are described as such arms allowed.
However, with the excesive power in ATRs, some feel that this qualifies as an artillery piece and not a firearm. The appeal on this case is expoected to hit the Supreme Court tomorrow.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Foxtrot News
Thousands of protesters gathered outside Parris Island today to either show support for Mr. Reigger or Mrs. Blomie. The protesters met at the Capital Building today where some elements began to clash. Some foreign protesters have come into the country just to see CM disarm. However, these protesters were in for a suprise when some of the Pro-Gun crowd (who outnumbered the anti-gun crowd five to one) drew a gun and began firing into the midst. Nobody was killed, but fifty protesters were wounded and the foreigners arreste on immigration charges. As the Police could not legally break the crowd up until they witnessed such acts, the shooters were never captured...probably much to the chagrin of the Police who are overwhelmingly pro-gun.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Teuful Hounden News
A new anti-gun suit has just been filed after the picture of a seven-year-old girl carrying an AK-47 in the Baghdad reqion of Iraq was seen over the news wire. Jane Fondue, 97, of Iwo Jima said that the ability for minors to own and carry firearms in public was criminally negligent ans is suing the State for "this outrage" said Fondue. Many feel the photo (http://jccc.afis.osd.mil/LBOX/full/1239109.jpg) is just a sign that parents are doing the right thing. It was not reported, however, that the girl's father took the picture. He claims he was just behind her as he was taking her to go shooting that afternoon and thought she looked cute in that picture. This is the second gun lawsuit in as many days and many feel that the rights of the Citizens are under attack by the extreme left in CM.