NationStates Jolt Archive


New war, new times, no mercy,

Franco-Canada
20-02-2005, 23:09
Here starts the new war
Pallawish
21-02-2005, 22:45
IC: Im sorry my great ally but I cannot help you. The Pallawish Nation has more pressing issues but we shall call our troops in soon if needs be. I will ask my allies if they would like to help you.

OCC: You should of made this a closed thread "with closed in the title" because other nations will try to help the opposition if you dont.

IC: Do not refer to me as your servant please, as I am far superior and are just helping out your nation.. you are however an ally of me, so I may send some troops in (OCC: IF YOU DONT GODMOD!!).
Webbsheviks
22-02-2005, 01:44
As Krishnikov stood in front of the Republic once more he spoke forth:

Krishnikov: I have decided to hold off on the attack. Neither one of us needs war. We should remain at peace.

At this moment, a young officer came scrambling into the hall, breaking nearly all sacrosanct rules of government and tripping upon the steps leading up to the stage to deliver a hastily written telegram.

Krishnikov read aloud furiously as the officer panted in exhaustion, here were its contents:

To President Krishnikov,
From Insider Sotrotkovvy,

I intercepted this message from the region of Franco-Canada to the nation of Pallawish:

Screw this humiliation that is put on me, Pallawish my faithful ally let us unite ounce again, no turning back and destroy the counter revolutionary conns

After Krishnikov had finished reading, he looked up from the single paper and spoke into the microphone.

Krishnikov: Our opponent is well spoken. Many a time have I heard pleasant words used to describe opposition, but never have I heard anything so profound as "Screw-"

The great round hall was filled with laughter.

Krishnikov resumed: He calls upon Pallawish as though it is his little "faithful" servant, such mal-treatment of his only ally. He wishes to start another war out of "humiliation", such selfish desires, no?

The hall rang with laughter again.

Krishnikov yelled over the uproar: And what's even more disturbing, more frightening than all...

The hall got silent.

Krishnikov: Is that he plans to unite OUNCE again! To fight against the Counter Revolutionary ConNs!

This did it and many had to leave the room because of their jovial pangs.

However, it was still a serious issue and as they were relieved for fifteen minutes or so, the Procession of the Republic continued.

Krishnikov: Once again, we find ourselves in a war of defence. Fortunately, we have diverted more funds to our defence and therefore are better supplied. We have more allies and our capitol is now nomadic. Our anti-missle systems are in check and the best of the best...so I'm told...

He sighs and looks about the room in a glaze of detachment...losing all hope of quietness on the fronts of the Counter Revolutionary Cons.

Krishnikov: I was hoping for peace...but...this is how it must be. Well, set up the A-Plan defence once more. It looks as though war is in store for us all.
Franco-Canada
22-02-2005, 03:25
it has come to my attnetion thanks to my ally to make this a closed war so since no one else has replied this is now a closed thread to only pallawish i and the counterrevolutionary conns
Pallawish
22-02-2005, 03:33
--- Julius The Devious Spy ---
Julius Crept through the grounds as guards everywhere stood at their posts half asleep. It was easy to infiltrate the main base in which the president stood talking to the republic.

Julius approached the building slowly and swiftly, not being seen by any of the guards. As he approached the nearest window he was greeted by a guard equipped with a shotgun aimed straight at Julius's head.

Guard: "Hello there and goodbye"
Julius: "No thankyou, night night"

Extremely quickly Julius shot him with a "Pallawish Sweet Dreams Dart". This dart was made entirely for spies and on impact made the person it hit extremely drowsy and when they wake up they remember only what happened before they turned 20 (The dart doesnt work on anyone under 20).
Julius then quickly grabbed the guard by his collar and shoved him into the shrubbery on the side of the building.

After roughly 20 minutes Julius had attached a hearing device to the top window and had lowered himself down to listen to the conversation without being caught.

Julius: "Ah, so he mocks the Pallawish Nation and our ally, we will see what Lord Thomas III says about this.."

He then starts to feed the recording into a handheld device and the message arrives on Lord Thomas III's computer.

**As Julius attempts to leave the base he trips on an alarm and is beaten to death by 20 guards**

---To Avoid Internation Incident Julius did not have anything revealing he was from the Pallawish Government and so The Pallawish Government could not be accused of doing anything--

OFFICIAL RESPONSE FROM LORD THOMAS III:
"Times have changed.. the Pallawish government may be sending a large amount of troops to help our ally. The official decision will be announced in a few days."
Pallawish
22-02-2005, 03:35
OCC: Franco-Canada you have to either change the title of this thread to say CLOSED in it or change your first thing you posted to say "THIS IS A CLOSED THREAD!! NO OTHER NATIONS SHALL BE INVOLVED WITHOUT PERMISSION"..
Pallawish
22-02-2005, 04:00
OCC: Also I would like to add that you have to DEPOLY YOUR ARMY BEFORE YOU START. And as your both such good god modders I will explain (no offense).. Okay well first you deploy your army and this is the only army you can use the whole game. Your whole army is 2% of your total population so serioulsy use a calculator! Ok well then after you got that u can deploy your army. Then throughout the battle you roleplay the army you deployed at the start. You also have to be realistic and I will decide how many people die from each attack (and dont worry im not gunna be slack about it). Also your not allowed to use nukes or bombs and just randomly attack cities and like carpet bomb em, thats just stupid and not allowed. Ok and I will tell you when ur not roleplaying properly. This will be fun! (Dont worry just because im not on your side Webbsheviks doesnt mean I will be slack to you when I say how much die from like an attack or anything. I will be fair. After all armies are deployed is when the war starts. Ok are we fine with all this? :)
Webbsheviks
23-02-2005, 02:13
This is preposterous. How are the Counter Revolutionary Cons going to combat someone of such size? Surely our heroism, etc., but this hardly seems fair. To close the forum and put us at such a disadvantage is a cheap shot. Webbsheviks never intended it and neither should Franco-Canada.
Webbsheviks
23-02-2005, 06:08
You must allow foreign aid on my behalf. It is only fair. The Counter Revolutionary Cons stays steadfast in its resolution. It also calls for foreign aid if any have the compassion to come to its side and fight off the prideful invaders.
Webbsheviks
24-02-2005, 03:55
I take the silence to mean that Franco Canada and Pallawish have given up their assualt. You should close the thread and mark it dead FC.
Pallawish
24-02-2005, 22:43
But I havent given up. We should make it closed because you already have your whole region helping and that should be enough shouldnt it? Dont take the fun out of it with a massive nation with more than a billion population coming into the battle.
Webbsheviks
25-02-2005, 01:09
...Like Franco-Canada?
Pallawish
26-02-2005, 01:07
OCC: A huh.
Webbsheviks
26-02-2005, 07:17
Then this war is worthless.
Pallawish
27-02-2005, 07:58
Who carez it can still be fun :mp5:
Webbsheviks
28-02-2005, 04:20
Well...the fact is: Franco-Canada hasn't responded for a couple of weeks now. I don't even think that the originator of this war is present. It should be dropped immediately.
Franco-Canada
04-03-2005, 02:46
no the war is on and the only way i will give up is either your defeat or huge reperations so it is your choice death or debt
Webbsheviks
04-03-2005, 04:50
This is ridiculous. You don't respond for a week and then you tell me that the war is on? Where exactly were you? This war is utterly stupid. Call it off. You can't just respond any time you want to. You started the war and it took you forever. I don't even agree with the numbers. I proved Pallawish wrong anyway. I stand by my ground and refuse to compromise because the compromise is wrong. You're obviously a complete and senseless idiot. It's just dumb.
Webbsheviks
06-03-2005, 23:57
Wow, once again, I get no reply from Franco-Canada. I take it that this war is over- the thread is closed.
Franco-Canada
07-03-2005, 04:36
Well this war is on oh and sorry that I have better things to do than sit everday and look at nationstates, but no it isnt stupid you are or it seems that way, if not stupid you are hypocritical and no the war is not off I dont make the same mistake twice "idiot". so the war is on and will continue until retributions and an apology are made
Pallawish
07-03-2005, 10:11
OCC: *sigh* make up your mind.. this war is stupid.. i will pull out if u do not go on nationstates more bcoz how do we battle if ur never online!! is this war on or not? I will decide if your god modding or not ok? Ok well lets get this underway.. And you didnt prove me wrong Webbsheviks you n00b so lets start already!!! Hey how about this.. i will be on no side and attack both of you?? Make it a free for all? then would it be fair?? I wouldnt send in too many troops either. Ok?

IC: It seems the war may finally be underway.. Alert the Pallawish attack force. For The Pallawish!!
Webbsheviks
08-03-2005, 02:38
QUOTE=Franco-Canada]Well this war is on oh and sorry that I have better things to do than sit everday and look at nationstates, but no it isnt stupid you are or it seems that way, if not stupid you are hypocritical and no the war is not off I dont make the same mistake twice "idiot". so the war is on and will continue until retributions and an apology are made[/QUOTE]

Wow, what nice and incoherent sentences you crafted! Good job in grammar 101. I see you passed. I'm glad you seem to think that when you write down a sentence from that deftly chartered mind of yours, you require little punctuation or none at all. When you finally DO reply, I am put through the trying task of deciphering your poorly written and childish response. I thought this was a good one: "Well this war is on oh and sorry that I have better things to do than sit everday and look at nationstates, but no it isnt stupid you are or it seems that way, if not stupid you are hypocritical and no the war is not off I dont make the same mistake twice 'idiot'." Good job buddy, you scored two commas and a period (-which was left out in the final "bring-it-home" clincher, apparently due to a slip of your fourth-most, flippant finger. And also you were at a loss when faced with capitalizing the first letter in the sentence.) However, let's not delve too deeply into your...let's say: training in grammar, or...lack there of. I'm very pleased to see that such an official note can be iced with frivolous quips such as "idiot" which is put in quotation marks in your original post...I'm not sure if it was meant for emphasis, or you were just quoting Andrew, but I don't think it was necessary. Also, I was glad to see that the war is still "on", or perhaps I'm not. Every time this war is "on" you leave the table for about a week. You claim that you have better things to do and yet you keep starting this war over and over again. Even if you don't look at this "everday", you can't play the "I've got a life" card...because, in all honesty, you don't. So really, we can stop this stupid war all together and let you get on with your "important" matters in your "important" life. Or I can just tell you "to forget about it" because the power is in my hands when it comes to whether or not I really want to participate- :(. Good job Franco-Canada, glad to see you're really on top of this whole "war" thing.
Pallawish
08-03-2005, 11:11
occ: Hey Nice Response!! You have my respect. Your IQ is as high as mine hahaha :) too bad my good old allies IQ has plummeted to like 5. Can we just battle or what!! C'mon Franco-Canada stop being a idiotic retard and lets do this war!! Dont make me change sides!! Prove me wrong Franco-Canada, Say something intelligent and lets do this war!!
Vanships
09-03-2005, 06:53
Hey, I'm in Franco Canada's region, and yes I admit his grammar and syntax were poorly considered in his response. However, a good deal of this deal happens to be a social conflict at school (I, Franco Canada, and Webbsheviks are in the same grade at the same school). I'm sure Webbsheviks knows this, however he does seem to ignore that fact, as well as "idiot" is one of his own trademark responses.......to just about anything. Also, I'd like to know, Webbsheviks, since you don't really communicate with me or F.C., how you know if we have "lives" or not. Also, you mention your participation. Well as all who read should know by now, no one has forced Webbsheviks to participate. He has chosen to stay with this as long as F.C., Pallawish, and I have. In addition to these facts, I communicate with F.C. at school, and so know the majority of what he has been occupied with lately. A good deal of it is driving (he just got his license), and importing for iTunes. I know some of it is probably mods, pc games, and xbox-live as well. Lastly, to touch on your little remarks of "important". I would just like to know whether you're being condescending, or utilizing the classic "just kidding" response. All in all, Pallawish, I warn you to be chary since a lot of this deals with a social schism at school. I'll talk with F.C., and hope that you see that Webbsheviks thinks that the war (which you eagerly want to begin) itself is stupid.----PS: By the way, what's with the Hamtaro flag??????
Pallawish
09-03-2005, 08:13
1 OCC: Dont mock my grammar if this wrong!! Unlike u guyz i only care about if it makes sense.. not the spelling.
2 OCC: You gotta love hamtaro!! Well.. i dont really know about the show but i cant resist a hamster as my flag!! Anywayz I will back out from the war or join the other side if F.C doesnt respond by tommorow. And i think i know this involve your (outside nationstates) lives as.. well.. thats all the hell your talking about.. its a bit hard to miss.

Anywayz hurry up and reply or I will ally with the other side which I think will lead to your downfall and humiliation.

- Signed That guy.. oh yeah I remember his name, Lord Thomas III
Webbsheviks
10-03-2005, 03:13
Hey, I'm in Franco Canada's region, and yes I admit his grammar and syntax were poorly considered in his response. However, a good deal of this deal happens to be a social conflict at school (I, Franco Canada, and Webbsheviks are in the same grade at the same school). I'm sure Webbsheviks knows this, however he does seem to ignore that fact, as well as "idiot" is one of his own trademark responses.......to just about anything. Also, I'd like to know, Webbsheviks, since you don't really communicate with me or F.C., how you know if we have "lives" or not. Also, you mention your participation. Well as all who read should know by now, no one has forced Webbsheviks to participate. He has chosen to stay with this as long as F.C., Pallawish, and I have. In addition to these facts, I communicate with F.C. at school, and so know the majority of what he has been occupied with lately. A good deal of it is driving (he just got his license), and importing for iTunes. I know some of it is probably mods, pc games, and xbox-live as well. Lastly, to touch on your little remarks of "important". I would just like to know whether you're being condescending, or utilizing the classic "just kidding" response. All in all, Pallawish, I warn you to be chary since a lot of this deals with a social schism at school. I'll talk with F.C., and hope that you see that Webbsheviks thinks that the war (which you eagerly want to begin) itself is stupid.----PS: By the way, what's with the Hamtaro flag??????


I must say, Franco-Canada, I'm impressed...you got someone else to fight your battle for you. Or did "Vanships" do this all on his very own? Where shall I begin? First of all, I'm so VERY sorry for crossing that line. I didn't know that Franco-Canada had SO much on his plate! I mean, what could be more time-consuming than “driving” (that’s so special) and "importing for iTunes", and playing little games, oh, I'm so sorry, NOW I understand. God, this is ridiculous. Come on, first you have to stand up for "F.C." because he can't even defend himself or he's too consumed with "iTunes" and now you pull out this weak and annoyingly pitiful excuse- boo hoo he's got so much going on in his hectic life! Now lets baby little "F.C." and give him peanut-butter crackers with hot chocolate, what a traumatic experience! What you seem to forget is that I wasn't eating crackers in a dark corner for the three years that we hung out and unless something has gone really up-hill, and all of your little lives have really taken off, then my assessment was fairly accurate: you don't have an action-packed life that can't spare a minute or two to write in the forum that you already started. I find it amazing that you just came out of thin air. No one has forced me to participate- I would agree. But for you to come storming in at Franco-Canada's aid is pathetic and it saddens me to an extent, however I would expect it from you. When I said "important" matters, I WAS being condescending and it would take an idiot not to realize that. You speak of it as a bad thing and you are guilty of it yourself. If you aren't speaking of it as a bad thing, why bring it up at all? I don't use "just kidding." Franco-Canada does. I don't. Also, what is this convoluted sentence and what is it supposed to mean: "I'll talk with F.C., and hope that you see that Webbsheviks thinks that the war (which you eagerly want to begin) itself is stupid." I will talk with F.C., AND HOPE THAT YOU SEE THAT WEBBSHEVIKS THINKS THAT THE WAR (which you eagerly want to begin) ITSELF IS STUPID. Let's just take the words in caps: ...and hope that you see that Webbsheviks thinks that the war itself is stupid...why ask Franco-Canada? Why not ask me? I'll tell you right now: it's stupid. Franco-Canada can't even defend himself, and when he does it's plain pathetic, a little child could write better; when he doesn't, it's pathetic again because he has his little slave-monkey hopping to his side to combat this “IRRATIONAL FORCE!” Ah! You know what I find really "cute" Vanships? This last sentence: "PS: By the way, what's with the Hamtaro flag??????" Aw, isn't that special? Even though you were worked up in defense of Franco-Canada, you were able to cool down with that level mind of yours and speak on a more personal and friendlier level with your ally, Pallawish. What a precious question that was. That really does show that you're a forgiving and rational person.... I can't believe this was the best you can do. It's pitiful. You even treat your own ally like an idiot by telling him that there is obviously a "social schism"...duh. Pallawish is not a retard! He can figure it out through the context. Apparently you can't. And with that closing note, I think I shall leave and await yet another ill-thought out attack on not only my character, but my logic.
Vanships
10-03-2005, 04:24
Fyi, this was completely from my own efforts. Webbsheviks, why does it really matter so much what he does in his spare time anyway? I named those activities as they are confirmed pieces of evidence to go against your previous statements. It’s not the fact that he can’t defend himself, as you put it. Rather he doesn’t really care about your thoughts or opinions anymore. Alas, I encounter yet a classic “Webbsheviks” moment. You automatically assume that since I argue against your point, that my argument is “weak and annoyingly pitiful.” Practically, because you have been angry for so long and that I have taken a contrary position, I create output that is “weak and annoyingly pitiful.” True, I don’t have an “action packed life”. I doubt that many people do. However, I spend most of my time with other activities. I won’t name them, and allow you a chance to nitpick each activity. By the way, I didn’t start this forum. I simply have been keeping track. Now, if defending someone at all counts as “storming in” then apparently I have stormed in. I brought up condescension because I tend to recall a discussion that was practically nothing but you saying, “I forgive you, I forgive you, I forgive you…” It has been your habit to act in such a fashion about ever since then. (Your memory is selective yet again, as “Just kidding” was F.C.’s manner about one and a half years ago.) Oh and why do you think I was asking a question? “I'll talk with F.C., and hope that you see that Webbsheviks thinks that the war (which you eagerly want to begin) itself is stupid.”---no, don’t see a question mark in there. You had no need to restate your obvious view of the war. ---Slave-monkey, hmm if you prefer to use that moniker, then I believe you were a “slave monkey” about all of last year, up until the end of the 3rd quarter I believe. What’s wrong with asking Pallawish about his flag? It wasn’t an attempt at being “cute” and “special.” I admit it was on a personal and friendly basis….but then how can it be so wrong? I didn’t think he knew this was a social schism, sor-ry. I didn’t know he had prior knowledge of us being schoolmates. Also, what’s with the weird statement saying I can’t tell that this is a schism? Honestly, you almost yelled at lunch that you are being “unreasonable” on NationStates. So how can I not attack your logic, when there is an evident acknowledgement of ill-logic?
Franco-Canada
10-03-2005, 04:40
wow a new low trey, having to insult my spelling. honestly i dont care, but not many people care what you think anymore trey. So do us all a favor and just go away, you have brought this upon yourself so suck it up and take it like a man. Well as close as you can go to being a man. And Pallawish i responded as u wanted.
Hawaiian Islands
10-03-2005, 04:49
"Sir, Franco-Canada wants war."

"With who?"

"Uhh.. He just wants war."

"This goes well."

Hawaiian Islands INVADES Franco-Canada
President: Our military is in great shape. Highly Proficient, and Fiercely Trained. Our troops will be a double competition among superpower countries. Our National Safety is ranked one of the highest, in the world. Our weapons are state of the art. We haven't had such a military training with a war. This shall prepare us for our future missions. At the same time, Hawaii needs more land. More natural resources such as oil. Land for our densely populated. I hearby declare invasion on Franco-Canada.

At War Base
1 million soldiers has just prepared on their journey to Franco-Canada. Is it told that they have help from a country, but is not as powerful as we are. The Navy, Airforce, and Tank Divisions has been deployed and is estimated to reach Franco-Canada in 1 NS day.

-Connie, News 10
Hawaiian Islands
10-03-2005, 04:56
wow a new low trey, having to insult my spelling. honestly i dont care, but not many people care what you think anymore trey. So do us all a favor and just go away, you have brought this upon yourself so suck it up and take it like a man. Well as close as you can go to being a man. And Pallawish i responded as u wanted.

No offense to ask you...

but what grade are you in?
Webbsheviks
10-03-2005, 05:02
Fyi, this was completely from my own efforts. Webbsheviks, why does it really matter so much what he does in his spare time anyway? I named those activities as they are confirmed pieces of evidence to go against your previous statements. It’s not the fact that he can’t defend himself, as you put it. Rather he doesn’t really care about your thoughts or opinions anymore. Alas, I encounter yet a classic “Webbsheviks” moment. You automatically assume that since I argue against your point, that my argument is “weak and annoyingly pitiful.” Practically, because you have been angry for so long and that I have taken a contrary position, I create output that is “weak and annoyingly pitiful.” True, I don’t have an “action packed life”. I doubt that many people do. However, I spend most of my time with other activities. I won’t name them, and allow you a chance to nitpick each activity. By the way, I didn’t start this forum. I simply have been keeping track. Now, if defending someone at all counts as “storming in” then apparently I have stormed in. I brought up condescension because I tend to recall a discussion that was practically nothing but you saying, “I forgive you, I forgive you, I forgive you…” It has been your habit to act in such a fashion about ever since then. (Your memory is selective yet again, as “Just kidding” was F.C.’s manner about one and a half years ago.) Oh and why do you think I was asking a question? “I'll talk with F.C., and hope that you see that Webbsheviks thinks that the war (which you eagerly want to begin) itself is stupid.”---no, don’t see a question mark in there. You had no need to restate your obvious view of the war. ---Slave-monkey, hmm if you prefer to use that moniker, then I believe you were a “slave monkey” about all of last year, up until the end of the 3rd quarter I believe. What’s wrong with asking Pallawish about his flag? It wasn’t an attempt at being “cute” and “special.” I admit it was on a personal and friendly basis….but then how can it be so wrong? I didn’t think he knew this was a social schism, sor-ry. I didn’t know he had prior knowledge of us being schoolmates. Also, what’s with the weird statement saying I can’t tell that this is a schism? Honestly, you almost yelled at lunch that you are being “unreasonable” on NationStates. So how can I not attack your logic, when there is an evident acknowledgement of ill-logic?

Why does it matter what he does in his spare time? Because he brought up the fact that his spare time was being consumed by "better" things than the war he started on NationStates and consequently, real life. "He doesn't care about your thoughts or opinions anymore." How cliche and completely life-less is that? Why should I care if he cares? I don't. Furthermore, I didn't say that you were asking a question through the statement, Vanships, I was questioning the statement and then answering the question you planned to propose to Franco-Canada in the future. Slave-monkey, to me, is yet another word for door mat- which is what you are. You're just a doormat unless it's someone trying to work for your benefit, then you're angry and defend the wrong person. The fact that you are defending anyone is against your original promise which was that you weren't going to "GET IN THE MIDDLE OF THIS", meaning you defend either. I can see how well that worked out. What's wrong with being "cute" and "special" to your ally? Well, there isn't anything morally wrong, it's just insulting to me and to Pallawish. What's the meaning of this attitude: "sor-ry"? That's also annoying. Just write "sorry", like a man. When I “yelled” at lunch that I was being un-reasonable, it was obviously an attempt to throw a stick in the spokes of all of the other disagreements in the past and jump-start a completely new path, out of our comfort zone, so that, at least one of us, could claim to be un-reasonable. I gave "F.C." the chance to be the better man by being the worse one. He stooped to the level that I was warning against- I foresaw it anyway. There is a point that pride cannot cross for him or for me. Since I had nothing to lose, I went all out. I said that I was being un-reasonable to stop the generic "fight sequence" in its tracks and create an environment where everyone was off-balance and therefore more open to ideas. My pieces on inherent selfishness and stubbornness and also natural conflicts were not taken in their pure sense, but in the mind-frame that they would never be used. Repeatedly you claimed you were open to the CDG if it could be altered. Repeatedly I told you that it could be altered, that was a main pillar of its flexibility and that I had, indeed, altered it already. I propose it at as a solution and you deny it- out of pure stubbornness. Then you say nothing, along with David, as F.C. tells me to leave "the table." I do so. And not once have I had to deal with this bull that I had to put up with. At Clayton's table, my ideas are freely accepted and considered- many are debated and there isn't an air of stuffy reserve. I don't have to hold back anything, which actually makes me less outspoken. I'm friendlier and more accepting. I tried to overhaul the old hierarchy and create a new, "open forum" atmosphere: the way it should be. You yourself said that you were opposed to this atmosphere and that you shunned many arguments of relative importance. For that reason, I was pleased to leave. So when I said that I was being perfectly un-reasonable, it was too stop the trains, set the ball into an un-chartered motion and explore new heights. Who has ever actually admitted that they were being un-reasonable? My thinking was that if I were to do that, we could start from the ground level and work our way up. If I admitted that I was being un-reasonable, then my arguments could be disproved through logic, through the CDG and therefore, the debate would be solved. So, claiming to be un-reasonable was a risky maneuver that paid off in some regards but initially failed in others. Obviously you did not think as far as I had, or else you would have figured it out already. If you did, and you’re just playing stupid, shame.
Franco-Canada
10-03-2005, 05:28
This is closed you cant join "idiot"
Pallawish
10-03-2005, 05:31
No offense to ask you...

but what grade are you in?

OCC: You will be amazed when he tells u. I think they type too much.. I cant be bothered to read it all..

IC: The Pallawish Nation has hereby withdrawn all forces and will watch this amusing battle. Troops may be deployed later.
Franco-Canada
10-03-2005, 05:32
lol, wow seriously you are that oblivious !!!! that is funny, Clayton himself has come to us and Said "why did you send him to our group" "sigh"
Pallawish
10-03-2005, 05:36
From what I "as an outsider" have gathered:

- Franco-Canada: Cant spell and very angry.(Extremely short replies)
- Webbsheviks: Annoyingly Intelligent (too long replies)
- Hawaiian Islands: Has as much of a clue as me (good replies)
- Vanships: Friend of.. who again? (too long replies)
- Pallawish: Well.. im not an outsider to myself..
Webbsheviks
10-03-2005, 05:37
Oh, genius, Chris. You've really proved yourself. Not only do you thrash out violently with no basis, but you call anyone who attempts to join the war an idiot in a rash manner. It's interesting Chris, you're right, ignorance IS bliss. However, I won't tell you how you are the completely oblivious one, because this is neither the time nor the place to do it. Unfortunately, you are acting very childish and I wouldn't expect any less from you. We are all in 10th grade to answer your question, Hawaii. Yet, Chris, or, Franco-Canada, doesn't act like he is...which is sometimes...no surprise at all.
Webbsheviks
10-03-2005, 05:46
To all: This is a beautiful example of my theory in progress...the inevitable Socio-Interaction Resolve Theory. The plates are in motion, the explosion has begun and the mountains will form. Genius...in the making.
Pallawish
10-03-2005, 05:51
Your too intelligent!! Ahh!!
Vanships
10-03-2005, 06:08
Well he must have better things to do in his real life. You should care since you are making statements saying that he is just being weak and pathetic in defending himself. Don't you care about being consistent? I’m not a doormat; I’m just trying to be a friend to someone who has continually mellowed out for the past year or so. I do regret that you see him as the wrong person. I’m simply doing what I can out of my own free will. I’m not stuck between the 2 of you, otherwise I couldn’t defend a side (as even you have expressed). For crying out loud, I’m not just defending here. I am fighting my own battle with you too, as you know I have for a while. You weren’t just mad at F.C., you even told me you’ve held grudges against me and F.C. for quite a while. By the way, I did not mean to be insulting by asking about someone’s flag (nor do I understand how it could be insulting, unless someone dragged it far out of context). Well, your act at lunch was clearly a basis for your present actions as well, including leaving our clique. Above all, please tell me what exactly you “foresaw,” and why being unbalanced leaves people open to ideas. Your pieces were honestly absurd in the purest sense. The CDG and all its longer-named forms were annoyances and idealistic short-term solutions. Not to mention the fact that you brought it up to so many people in spite of me (“For a select few eyes,” oh brother). The SIP made no sense, I think even you know that. I read it and asked everyone who did. They said it really didn’t make sense, and many agreed that it seemed to be a piece of pseudo-intellectual perplexity. Well, you told me that you either wanted to reform our group to fit your wants, or you would leave for Clayton’s table. The result was painfully obvious. Good for you then if you find lunch at that table more enjoyable. I don’t really care if they suit you or not. You had a problem with us, and you couldn’t get your way. So you found the right fit elsewhere, good then. Now about you referencing my past comment: I said that last when you and F.C. last fought, which was a while ago. Well, as a result of your comment, you did achieve the goal of convincing us that you acted without reason. However, there was actually hardly any tension this year. That is until you brought up the CDG. It’s interesting; you initially began a conflict just so you could implement your own plan. I’d just like to say that you’re attempts to “solve the debate” were quite off for someone who claimed to think so far ahead. To conclude, what I have figured out is that people can change considerably. F.C. mellowed out considerably, while you got more hostile. I regret nothing for getting along with F.C. If it bothers you, I will just go about with my life and remember that I’m not here to boost your ego.
The Silent Phoenix
11-03-2005, 00:38
lol, wow seriously you are that oblivious !!!! that is funny, Clayton himself has come to us and Said "why did you send him to our group" "sigh"

Actually, I was there when he said that, and it is as Franco-Canada says. However, I am afraid that Franco-Canada is missing some finer points. Clayton has admitted to us that Trey has become better, and stopped being a deuch-bag(spelling?).I hope you all seriously stop using contradictions for your arguements. First of all, if this is a social problem, why bring it into a game? Second, if this is just a game, why make a social problem out of it? If Webbsheviks has pushed this war into happening, doesn't it make you just as guilty for pursuing it? If you think the war is ridiculous, why don't you just quit? Surely Webbsheviks will call you a loser, or something of the like, but why should you care? You aren't his friend anymore, so what he says shouldn't matter. Why would you listen to your enemy?
Franco-Canada
11-03-2005, 00:50
Fine, bruno is right, from here on the war is off. Say what you will trey, but personally i dont care anymore. It is off ! and Pallawish the reason i dont type much and when i do it is horribly mispelled is becasue i am a bad typist. Oh and contrary to what trey says i am the smarter one, he just has no life and types on his computer everyday. Now that this is cleared up i am closing the forum so, Bye
The Silent Phoenix
11-03-2005, 00:50
Well he must have better things to do in his real life. You should care since you are making statements saying that he is just being weak and pathetic in defending himself. Don't you care about being consistent? I’m not a doormat; I’m just trying to be a friend to someone who has continually mellowed out for the past year or so. I do regret that you see him as the wrong person. I’m simply doing what I can out of my own free will. I’m not stuck between the 2 of you, otherwise I couldn’t defend a side (as even you have expressed). For crying out loud, I’m not just defending here. I am fighting my own battle with you too, as you know I have for a while. You weren’t just mad at F.C., you even told me you’ve held grudges against me and F.C. for quite a while. By the way, I did not mean to be insulting by asking about someone’s flag (nor do I understand how it could be insulting, unless someone dragged it far out of context). Well, your act at lunch was clearly a basis for your present actions as well, including leaving our clique. Above all, please tell me what exactly you “foresaw,” and why being unbalanced leaves people open to ideas. Your pieces were honestly absurd in the purest sense. The CDG and all its longer-named forms were annoyances and idealistic short-term solutions. Not to mention the fact that you brought it up to so many people in spite of me (“For a select few eyes,” oh brother). The SIP made no sense, I think even you know that. I read it and asked everyone who did. They said it really didn’t make sense, and many agreed that it seemed to be a piece of pseudo-intellectual perplexity. Well, you told me that you either wanted to reform our group to fit your wants, or you would leave for Clayton’s table. The result was painfully obvious. Good for you then if you find lunch at that table more enjoyable. I don’t really care if they suit you or not. You had a problem with us, and you couldn’t get your way. So you found the right fit elsewhere, good then. Now about you referencing my past comment: I said that last when you and F.C. last fought, which was a while ago. Well, as a result of your comment, you did achieve the goal of convincing us that you acted without reason. However, there was actually hardly any tension this year. That is until you brought up the CDG. It’s interesting; you initially began a conflict just so you could implement your own plan. I’d just like to say that you’re attempts to “solve the debate” were quite off for someone who claimed to think so far ahead. To conclude, what I have figured out is that people can change considerably. F.C. mellowed out considerably, while you got more hostile. I regret nothing for getting along with F.C. If it bothers you, I will just go about with my life and remember that I’m not here to boost your ego.

I hope you don't mind a small criticism, but you just gave him an ego boost. By posting, you are enhancing his esteem. As long as you acknowledge him, you give him an ego boost. As you so put it "He is the best at bitching," and to tell the truth, he is. Which is exactly why he is getting a boost of self esteem. If you tell him you wish to bother him, he'll shut himself off and simply laugh at you. Whatever you do, he'll simply laugh at you. Why? Because you are who you are and you do whatever you want to in order to fight this battle, which is beyond pointless. What are you all trying to prove out here? It's funny, because I was never around for the big split, and I always hear opposing stories, and I find I can't trust either one because they are biased. If you didn't really care about each other, why do you keep trying to prove something to one another?
Franco-Canada
11-03-2005, 00:56
It is ended any posts after the ending of this thread is against Jolt rules
Webbsheviks
11-03-2005, 02:03
Victory has arrived.
Hawaiian Islands
12-03-2005, 06:02
Oh, genius, Chris. You've really proved yourself. Not only do you thrash out violently with no basis, but you call anyone who attempts to join the war an idiot in a rash manner. It's interesting Chris, you're right, ignorance IS bliss. However, I won't tell you how you are the completely oblivious one, because this is neither the time nor the place to do it. Unfortunately, you are acting very childish and I wouldn't expect any less from you. We are all in 10th grade to answer your question, Hawaii. Yet, Chris, or, Franco-Canada, doesn't act like he is...which is sometimes...no surprise at all.
I am acting childish? A simple question is childish? Just to let you know, I'm in 8th grade, and I have better punctuation that most of you, 10th graders... Haha...
Webbsheviks
13-03-2005, 00:40
Perhaps you confused my comments directed at Franco-Canada as being directed at yourself. I apologize for the confusion.
Webbsheviks
17-03-2005, 04:49
As a final note, Webbsheviks would like to remind those involved that it did not start this or any of the other three wars...Franco-Canada did.