NationStates Jolt Archive


Naval Exercise to be conducted 3 miles from DA's coast! {Att-DA, Axis Nova}

Samtonia
30-12-2004, 04:15
Samtonia is proud to announce, in response to the blatant idiocy and inherent hypocriticalness on the behalf of both Kahta and Decisive Action, as well as their ally in the matter of naval exercises held three miles off the coast of Sevaris, that Axis Nova and Samtonia plan to engage in a naval training exercise three miles off the coast of Mississippian territorial claims.

The ships will not be using live rounds, but it is strongly urged all foreign and domestic vessels not participating steer clear of the training area.

This has been a friendly Samtonian warning to any and all nations affected by this exercise. We suggest DA not attempt to stop the vessels- any hostile actions will be seen as a declaration of war by DA upon Samtonia and all her allies.

Samtonian Council of Thirteen

[OOC- In response to this (http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=384516) thread.]
Tyrandis
30-12-2004, 04:18
OOC: Check your TGs.
Decisive Action
30-12-2004, 04:24
I ignore Axis Nova, and since he is a main player in this thread, I'll just ignore it if he participates. Also, Samtonia, aren't you the guy who claimed all those islands in Earth II without even RPing them? (If so, I think I ignore you as well)
Samtonia
30-12-2004, 04:28
[OOC- First, it's nice to denote OOC with an OOC tag. Second, ah well about Axis Nova. Then just my ships exist. Third, I just friggin got onto Earth II and those were the only territories left next to one another. And I have been RPing them. I'm moving to try to annex possibly the virgin Islands. So please, RP it. Or contact me]
Decisive Action
30-12-2004, 04:32
"Any of your ships which come north of Fabus Island will be sunk. I will allow your ships, unarmed, to be in waters near Fabus Island, but only because my husband is not well-enough to make a decision on this matter at the time. You will be allowed to conduct exercises for 24 hours. Your ships will be closely shadowed by over 500 of our own ships and overflights of thousands of planes, attempt anything funny, and suffer the consequences."


Czarina Alice Fabus
Samtonia
30-12-2004, 18:57
You are quite the font of humor. Now kindly stop. You deign to threaten us? The day you actually scare us in any way, shape, or form is the day we take your thoughts as sane and rational. Until then, your whining will have no effect upon our foreign policy.

Now get something straight, all you Mississippians. We will proceed with the exercise, we will do whatever the hell we want munitions-wise, and we can and will do this 3 miles from your coastline.

If you want to try to overfly us, go right ahead. However, Field Marshal Dalton doesn’t take too kindly to aircraft or vessels he views as threats. So be warned. If you fly planes above our feet, bring ships next to our fleet, or attempt to intercede in the exercise, it will be seen as a declaration of war.

Keep your planes at least 5 km. from our vessels in all directions and nowhere above our fleet in its airspace at any time. Keep your ships at least 5 km. away as well. Any intrusion into this space will be met with the most force possible. Remember, although we may be using blank rounds to fire at our ally Axis Nova, some live rounds could accidentally slip into the guns when you come near us.

So be warned, Mississippi! Your craven threats scare us not, your pathetic military inspires no fear, and your nervous bluster inspires no feelings of pity. We have no qualms about utterly destroying you and we can and will should it come to war. Have a nice day.

http://img94.exs.cx/img94/2290/Clipboard12.jpg
Minister X, Leader of Samtonian Council of Thirteen

+++++++++++++
Annotated Orders issued to Samtonian 12th Fleet

Addendum A.
Any and all foreign vessels and/or aircraft intruding within the airspace of the fleet or a 5km. zone around the fleet will be seen as hostile. Weapons are to be released at that time.

Addendum B.
Any and all Mississippian vessels and aircraft, private or commercial, will be seen to be violating Addendum A in the same manner as military vessels and should be dealt with accordingly.

Addendum C.
Appropriate commanders are authorized to retaliate totally should ICBM or WMD attack occur upon fleet. No authorization necessary, as per Directive 6265. Order code beta, should necessity arise.
VoteEarly
30-12-2004, 22:46
We stand by our ally and declare that if Samtonia attempts to enter the waters of Mississippi, we WILL launch a nuclear first strike against them. We will not permit them to bully our allies.


Alex Turner
[Council of War]
Samtonia
31-12-2004, 00:33
We stand by our ally and declare that if Samtonia attempts to enter the waters of Mississippi, we WILL launch a nuclear first strike against them. We will not permit them to bully our allies.


Alex Turner
[Council of War]

And you WILL be glassed by no less then half a dozen allies, as well as your ally Decisive Action. If you really want to help them, stay out puny ones. Otherwise, there'll be mushroom clouds over both your nations. and that's if we enter Mississippi's waters? Get real. And kindly sod off. Otherwise you may have Samtonian field armies knock-knock-knocking at your door.

Decisive Action, we suggest you reign in your all-too-eager allies. Any attack on us by them of the WMD variety will be viewed as having been orchestrated by both themselves and you. Call it a "moving" deterrant if you will. You work to prevent them from using their loose nukes, you and us can survive safe, happy, and sound. You don't and no one survives.

We hope that our policy in this matter convinces you to turn back your less then sane allies.

Samtonian Council of Thirteen
Axis Nova
31-12-2004, 04:18
We wish to note that if our SDI network detects any ICBMs, regardless of source, all of them will be eliminated.

(ooc: tag so that I don't lose the thread again)
Tyrandis
31-12-2004, 04:22
We stand by our ally and declare that if Samtonia attempts to enter the waters of Mississippi, we WILL launch a nuclear first strike against them. We will not permit them to bully our allies.


Alex Turner
[Council of War]

Statement from the Department of Foreign Affairs

"And I suggest to you, oh people of VE, that you sit down, shut up, and drink your milk. The use of nuclear arms against a NATO ally of the Militant Imperium will be met with the total and utter annihilation of your puny country."

http://www.adventchildren.net/ff7ac/movie/images/char-yuffie.jpg
Director Valerie Fenton
Director of Foreign Affairs
Tyrandis
01-01-2005, 01:08
I just realized something: VoteEarly is (was) a puppet of DA's.

Look: http://s7.invisionfree.com/LOEL/index.php?showtopic=30


My nations are Decisive Action, Mississippian Egypt, Baalbek, VoteEarly, TheCM, and one they didn't delete

Hooray. In addition to being a guy who hid behind an ignore shield, he's also a puppetwanker.
Kahta
01-01-2005, 01:46
I just realized something: VoteEarly is (was) a puppet of DA's.

Look: http://s7.invisionfree.com/LOEL/index.php?showtopic=30



Hooray. In addition to being a guy who hid behind an ignore shield, he's also a puppetwanker.


He had them because he feared deletion.
Tyrandis
01-01-2005, 01:47
He had them because he feared deletion.

He still used VoteEarly to give himself an IC advantage by giving him a second pop base to fight off Samtonia. Ergo, puppetwanking.
Kahta
01-01-2005, 02:41
He still used VoteEarly to give himself an IC advantage by giving him a second pop base to fight off Samtonia. Ergo, puppetwanking.


What is it that you have against him?
Tyrandis
01-01-2005, 19:21
What is it that you have against him?

Nothing beyond the puppetwanking.
Praetonia
01-01-2005, 19:28
He had them because he feared deletion.
Actually, he used a puppet so that he could threaten to nuke an enemy into submission without fear of retaliation against his homeland. He was just unlucky that he's being attacked by someone with a brain who wisely said that a retaliation would be against both nations.

That is puppetwanking at its worst.
Samtonia
01-01-2005, 21:36
Actually, he used a puppet so that he could threaten to nuke an enemy into submission without fear of retaliation against his homeland. He was just unlucky that he's being attacked by someone with a brain who wisely said that a retaliation would be against both nations.

That is puppetwanking at its worst.
[OOC- Hooray! I have a brain! Thank you for the compliment! (Really, nothing mean or snide being said). But come on, isn't it just common sense to threaten the ally of the person who's about to nuke you with imminent glassing themselves, so that they're the ones that need to do the work to stop the deranged crazies from launching?

It is common sense, right? Or is it not and I just have very weird common sense?

A ns as for the wankery, I'm disappointed. RPing is an agreement. He broke it. If he ever gets back here, I'm igoring him for this heinous breach of protocol.]
Kahta
01-01-2005, 21:54
This is the only instance, and after that he stopped. I feel he is being unfairly targeted because you OOCly disagree with his IC policies. Hell, who doesnt?
Samtonia
01-01-2005, 22:02
This is the only instance, and after that he stopped. I feel he is being unfairly targeted because you OOCly disagree with his IC policies. Hell, who doesnt?

[OOC-Who cares if it was he only instance. It happened against me. Now maybe I'm a self-centered prig, but I just can't forgive that. Against someone else, sure. But me- well, I just can't. He broke the trust that I was giving him by RPing. That's not something I take lightly and I was, quite frankly, disappointed that someone who supposedly was such a goood RPer would resort to such wrong methods of gaining an edge.

So if he gets back, he's ignored. And unfairly targeted? How? He puppetwanked and threatened to nuke me with said puppet. He used a puppet to hide behind a shield. I'm not unfairly targeting him, I'm trying to keep my RPs at a level I want to deal with. Blatant cheating is not what I wat to deal with.

and you insult me. Why would I ever taint IC with OOC actions? Though you may know people who do this, I certainly count myself above them. I never woulddo this and am frankly insulted you suggested so much. For shame sir, for shame. Let he who is without sin throw the first stone.]