NationStates Jolt Archive


FRC Suggests Anti-Kahta Coaliation

Canad a
24-12-2004, 02:53
The Federal Republic of Canada think it is in the best interest of the nations of the free world to join together to impose the sanctions created by the Monarch of Kahta to oppress his people.

We must do anything possible to bring peace and democracy to Kahta and we are open to any suggestions you may have.

Secretary Darren Temple, State Secretary
State Department, Federal Republic of Canada

Nations whom support the Coalition
Sevaris
ONI Concordiat
DontPissUsOff
MassPwnage
Pheanix
Sevaris
24-12-2004, 02:59
Sevaris fully supports this. Kahta must be stopped, before he causes more damage to the world, and to civilisation.

-Kaiser Alec Mannerheim
ONI Concordiat
24-12-2004, 03:00
The Concordiat is willing to lend its support to this movement, as the Imperialist attitude of Khata has been irking us. We pledge our full support.
DontPissUsOff
24-12-2004, 03:00
Our full agreement with this shall be expressed in our joining of this coalition. Kahta has fallen from the status of being a sane and stable nation to being little more than a colony of Nazis.
MassPwnage
24-12-2004, 03:06
"Sure, why not, he seems to yet another derranged idiot."- The Great Leader Li.
Canad a
24-12-2004, 03:09
We would like to thank the nations who have currently have announced they'll support and join the coalition to impose Kahta. Thank you!

Secretary Darren Temple, State Secretary
State Department, Federal Republic of Canada
Tremalkier
24-12-2004, 03:17
The Kaiser wishes to know who this "Kahta" nation is before he pledges the support of the Iron Fist of Tremalkier to this petty coalition.
Canad a
24-12-2004, 03:19
Kahta's government practices Nazism but not in name. They have imperialistic wishes. Need I say more?
Tremalkier
24-12-2004, 03:22
Kahta's government practices Nazism but not in name. They have imperialistic wishes. Need I say more?
{Open Transmission}

Yes you must considering that Tremalkier too is an imperialist state. Being a Nazi country does not give one the right to intercede in their sovereign affairs unless said action will directly benefit the interceders...namely Tremalkier. Give us a good reason to invade them, and we shall do it, and we shall grind them under our heel like the worms they are next to us. However, if you fail in this, and this "Kahta" nation offers us more in exchange for our services, then be prepared, for the Hammers will be coming for you instead of they.

{End Transmission}
Pheanix
24-12-2004, 03:28
The Commonwealth of Pheanix pledges to do everything in its power to help stop Kahta.
Canad a
24-12-2004, 04:11
Bump!
The Phoenix Milita
24-12-2004, 04:21
A whole coalition!!
*laughs*
thats hardly necessary, Kahta will destroy itself anyway, and even if one were to want to "expidite" that process, it will hardly take a "coalition" to topple that little speck on the map that is Kahta.....

We idealogically agree with and support this coalition, but it ends there.
Moronyicka
24-12-2004, 04:25
Moronyicka condemns this alliance.
Sarzonia
24-12-2004, 04:28
Sarzonia wholeheartedly supports this coalition. That scum of a man Sam McDonald must be brought to justice and his nation eliminated as a threat.
Decisive Action
24-12-2004, 04:32
I'm almost totally certain that Kahta has FRC on ignore.
Kahta
24-12-2004, 20:59
I'm almost totally certain that Kahta has FRC on ignore.


Correct. It is due to: An inablity to understand complex technology. I don't have them on "ignore" but I ignore their RP's.
Kahta
24-12-2004, 21:01
Kahta's government practices Nazism but not in name. They have imperialistic wishes. Need I say more?

We are imperialistic and nothing more.

King MacDonald
Praetonia
24-12-2004, 21:09
I'm almost totally certain that Kahta has FRC on ignore.
Yeah you and your allies tend to ignore anyone who doesnt let you pwn them.

IC: [insert RP asking to join here]
Kahta
25-12-2004, 15:34
Yeah you and your allies tend to ignore anyone who doesnt let you pwn them.


No, we ignore people that don't know how to RP.
Canad a
25-12-2004, 20:37
I know how to RP. I just dont appreciate you making up technology that is so godly.
SovietRepublicofRussia
25-12-2004, 21:45
The nation of the Soviet Republic of Russia gives its full support to FRC in the matter at hand.
Kahta
25-12-2004, 22:20
I know how to RP. I just dont appreciate you making up technology that is so godly.


I'll unignore you for the time being, and ask that DA does the same.
Red Tide2
26-12-2004, 00:19
Correct. It is due to: An inablity to understand complex technology. I don't have them on "ignore" but I ignore their RP's.

OOC:What kind of complex technology?
Hogsweat
26-12-2004, 00:22
We will join this coalition.
The Burnsian Desert
26-12-2004, 01:12
The Burnsian Desert pledges our support.
Ronius Vigilantes
26-12-2004, 01:37
I would like to join this coalition as well.
Gurguvungunit
26-12-2004, 01:46
OOC:What technology won't you recognize?
Kahta
26-12-2004, 02:00
OOC:What technology won't you recognize?

OOC: Godmodding, such as LIDAR guided missiles.
Red Tide2
26-12-2004, 02:04
OOC:What kind of complex technology?

OOC:I repeat myself... also what LIDAR?
Kahta
26-12-2004, 02:28
OOC: http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=384495
Red Tide2
26-12-2004, 02:31
OOC:Was that supposed to be a answer to my question? If it was, uuuuuuuh... that link took me to that thread you posted on killing off those protestors.
Kahta
26-12-2004, 02:35
OOC:I repeat myself... also what LIDAR?


NVM
Whittier-
26-12-2004, 02:45
Whittier offers its support to Khata.
Kahta
26-12-2004, 02:48
Whittier offers its support to Khata.


OOC: http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=384485
Tyrandis
26-12-2004, 03:20
OOC: Just for reference, LIDAR stands for LIght Detection and Ranging. I don't understand how a technology that is IN USE by the military already in munitions is OMG GODMODDING, but w/e. I mean, ignoring ETC guns and trimarian ships is probably understandable, because those are only theoretical applications, but LIDAR is clearly MT. Aside from that, LIDAR-homing weapons require a secondary seeker like RADAR (RAdiowave Detection And Ranging) or IR (Infa-Red) to get the projectile itself close enough for the LIDAR section to engage... meaning that flares/chaff are still capable of defeating it, just not if the missile gets too close.
NaziCommunistJews
26-12-2004, 04:08
OOC: Godmodding, such as LIDAR guided missiles.
You realize by your logic, I could ignore "godmodding" such as infa-red, laser, or RADAR guided missiles, I could also ignore SONAR guided torpedos. but Ill save myself some time trouble and just ignore you ;)
Kahta
26-12-2004, 04:43
LIDAR is not used in missiles. On the ground yes, but not accurate, surely not effectively.
Tyrandis
27-12-2004, 01:27
LIDAR is not used in missiles. On the ground yes, but not accurate, surely not effectively.

Yes, LIDAR can be used in missiles, as pretty much every/anyone you ask will attest to. I use LIDAR in everyone of my AAMs, as a secondary seeker that engages once the primary seeker (RADAR or IR) has sent the missile close enough for the LIDAR section to engage.

Look, I don't see how the use of lasers/lightwaves to determine a target's speed, bearing and velocity through use of Doppler LIDAR and Rangefinder LIDAR is godmodding, esp. since NASA already uses this technology IRL.
Kahta
27-12-2004, 01:59
Yes, LIDAR can be used in missiles, as pretty much every/anyone you ask will attest to. I use LIDAR in everyone of my AAMs, as a secondary seeker that engages once the primary seeker (RADAR or IR) has sent the missile close enough for the LIDAR section to engage.

Look, I don't see how the use of lasers/lightwaves to determine a target's speed, bearing and velocity through use of Doppler LIDAR and Rangefinder LIDAR is godmodding, esp. since NASA already uses this technology IRL.


I was refering to using Lidar to detect things miles away, like missiles that can be fired and forgotten using only LIDAR to guide them.
Canad a
28-12-2004, 04:35
OCC: Thank you Kahta from moving your technological debate to a different thread, greatly appreciate it.
Kahta
28-12-2004, 04:40
OCC: Thank you Kahta from moving your technological debate to a different thread, greatly appreciate it.

OOC: NP