NationStates Jolt Archive


NWO Takes Steps to End Current world Problems!

Dr_Twist
21-11-2004, 09:26
As for what has been Happening as of Late has been beyond NWO's control we have been Dragged all around the Place doing everything. This is my Last and Personal Chance to attempt to stop the Current Crises presently happening around the world.

As such I am Calling the Leaders of NWO NATO and RWC to NWO HQ in Dr_Twist Immediately, Id you have no official high level Leadership position Please Don't post, If leaders from certain alliances don't attend it will be seen as they have no interest in world peace.

as such to keep Numbers low so this Thread doesn't Get Spammed to Death I want 3 Members from Each alliance, this Thread will be used for Talks only.

The Dr_Twist Government wishes to end the Present Problems and wishes to end them now.

Dr_Twist.
imported_ViZion
21-11-2004, 09:32
President Maybury of ViZion him self will be attending this meeting of grave importance. After all, this meeting could change the future of NS.
Hamptonshire
21-11-2004, 09:33
Hamptonshire is equal dedicated toward the necessary peace that must prevail in Europe. As Chairman of the Congressional Board, Hamptonshire will represent NATO. Two additional NATO representatives will join the Conference shortly.

Dr. Chester Olendorf, Prime Minister of Hamptonshire will travel to the Headquarters for the talks.
Dr_Twist
21-11-2004, 09:36
Hamptonshire is equal dedicated toward the necessary peace that must prevail in Europe. As Chairman of the Congressional Board, Hamptonshire will represent NATO. Two additional NATO representatives will join the Conference shortly.

Dr. Chester Olendorf, Prime Minister of Hamptonshire will travel to the Headquarters for the talks.

Prefer to keep numbers as low as possible but 3 is the Max per Alliance, this will be the Final Meeting in an attempt at peace as Radical things need to be done to head off the Issues that are currently Plaguing us.

If any of the Alliances do boycott this however they will be seen as nothing more then War Mongers in the Eyes of NWO and its Members.
Hamptonshire
21-11-2004, 09:42
Prefer to keep numbers as low as possible but 3 is the Max per Alliance, this will be the Final Meeting in an attempt at peace as Radical things need to be done to head off the Issues that are currently Plaguing us.

If any of the Alliances do boycott this however they will be seen as nothing more then War Mongers in the Eyes of NWO and its Members.

At the moment Hamptonshire is the sole representative. Since there are three "Leadership" division in NATO (Founders, Congressional Board, International Consortium Court) each Division may wish to send a representatives.

Be assured, however, that no matter how many people attend, we all have one position on this issue: Peace.
Dr_Twist
21-11-2004, 09:52
The 1st thing i would like to bring to the table.

I would like all Alliances to Agree on that they will not take any Offensive Action, If a Nation in an Alliance does take Offensive Action the Alliances have the Right to invade and Invade that Nation only, however if a complete Alliance is to Launch an Offensive Strike on Another Alliances the other two Alliances that didn't take the Offensive Action will have the Right to go to war upon the Offensive Alliance.

I know that this is starting to Get tight for some Alliances but steps need to be taken for Peace and this is going to be NWO attempt to bring the Peace at this meeting.

Dr_Twist.
Hamptonshire
21-11-2004, 10:03
I would like all Alliances to Agree on that they will not take any Offensive Action, If a Nation in an Alliance does take Offensive Action the Alliances have the Right to invade and Invade that Nation only, however if a complete Alliance is to Launch an Offensive Strike on Another Alliances the other two Alliances that didn't take the Offensive Action will have the Right to go to war upon the Offensive Alliance.

I know that this is starting to Get tight for some Alliances but steps need to be taken for Peace and this is going to be NWO attempt to bring the Peace at this meeting.

Dr_Twist.

NATO will accept this.
Dr_Twist
21-11-2004, 10:07
NATO will accept this.

We are also assuming that what every an Alliances does put forward that they would already of Agreed to.

We are still waiting for RWC leaders to Arrive to join the Discussions so if people are Reading this and this falls off the Top Page Please Bump it as it’s a Very Important Thread.

Thank you.
Hamptonshire
21-11-2004, 10:34
We are also assuming that what every an Alliances does put forward that they would already of Agreed to.

We are still waiting for RWC leaders to Arrive to join the Discussions so if people are Reading this and this falls off the Top Page Please Bump it as it’s a Very Important Thread.

Thank you.

NATO requests that the Proposal specify "unprovoked wars of agresssion" as opposed to all military action.

If a nation in an alliance* takes unprovoked offensive action, the alliances have the right to invade and declare war upon that nation only. If an entire alliance launches an offensive strike or declares wars on another alliance or nation, the other two alliances will have the right to go to war with the Offensive Alliance.

NATO would like this version to be adopted. (I just standardized the grammar)
Hamptonshire
21-11-2004, 11:13
[OOC: I'll be away for 8-10 hours, at least]
Kriegorgrad
21-11-2004, 11:24
OOC: I don't have any leadership authority but I have been given the position of Spokesman, so I feel I should be allowed to attend, to advise my leaders on whats best.
Dr_Twist
21-11-2004, 11:31
OOC: I don't have any leadership authority but I have been given the position of Spokesman, so I feel I should be allowed to attend, to advise my leaders on whats best.

Thank you, You are welcome to the meeting but things Must move fast on RWC's Side as they have yet to turn up with some one with the ability to put into place what is needed.

But please Remember max of 3 People per Alliance and preferably as little people as possible per Alliance, We need theses Reforms to come ASAP before something explodes without reason.

Dr_Twist.

OCC: Thanks hamp for doing those Small Changes.
Momanguise
21-11-2004, 12:33
ooc: May I attend for NWO please?
The Merchant Guilds
21-11-2004, 16:34
*RWC Bump*
Kriegorgrad
21-11-2004, 19:19
I shall attend this meeting personally and I will have an advisor from The Merchant Guilds. Also, an advisor from Dumpsterdam will be attending, he will be there to learn, the Dumpsterdanian Ambassador of the embassy in Kriegorgrad.

We hope this will loosen up tensions between our alliances.

Yours

Grand Inquisitorial Lord Matthias, Keeper of the Seal, Guardian of the Tome
DontPissUsOff
21-11-2004, 19:32
OOC: Hamptonsire, if you're OK with it I'll attend this one on behalf of the ICC, since WA's inactive and SP's now a CB dude...that said, you might want someone with a longer record of NSing.
Dumpsterdam
21-11-2004, 19:49
OoC: Tag, dutyfull tagging along with MG and Krieg.
Hamptonshire
21-11-2004, 20:53
OOC: Hamptonsire, if you're OK with it I'll attend this one on behalf of the ICC, since WA's inactive and SP's now a CB dude...that said, you might want someone with a longer record of NSing.

OOC: Come on over.
imported_ViZion
21-11-2004, 21:55
If a nation in an alliance* takes unprovoked offensive action, the alliances have the right to invade and declare war upon that nation only. If an entire alliance launches an offensive strike or declares wars on another alliance or nation, the other two alliances will have the right to go to war with the Offensive Alliance.
The second part will get us right back to where we started.

Also, I feel it is a must for the Gilb. Strait to be reopened if NATO truly wishes to avoid a large-scale war.
DontPissUsOff
21-11-2004, 22:06
OOC: *Sigh* Not a NATO job man. If it were, I'd be using my forces to help him, would I not?

Edit: Does this take the place of the other conference I'm at?
imported_ViZion
21-11-2004, 22:08
OOC: *Sigh* Not a NATO job man. If it were, I'd be using my forces to help him, would I not?
Well, if it's not and it starts a world war, I'd expect NATO would not help him out... after all, that is a major part of why a major war is very likely to break out soon...
DontPissUsOff
21-11-2004, 22:09
I can't comment on what NATO would do, simply because I don't know and it's not my place to theorise.
Hamptonshire
21-11-2004, 22:39
Unfortunately Gibraltar is sovereign territory of Chellis. NATO, by its Charter, cannot interfere with the internal matters of a member-state.

Rest assured that pressure will be applied to ease the closing of the Straight. While Hamptonshire and DPUO can speak and act as NATO Representatives, we have no standing in reference to the Chellian Government.
imported_ViZion
22-11-2004, 01:59
It is one thing if Chellis was in the middle of a war, in which we could understand this move. However, he is not in the middle of any such war that he must close it. He is only creating yet another reason for war to happen, as he is stopping trades and other free movement through the Med. Sea. Any nations not involved in any of this are now being effected as you can see.

Chellis must reopen it - at least for non-military ships at the least. If not, many will see it as a reason for war - and by not making him open it, or by not punishing him for refusing to open it - will give alliances such as the RWC, along with many other alliances and nations a reason for war, as you are allowing Chellis to block the right of free passage for trading, among other things.

Chellis must at least open it to non-military ships. If he refuses, he must be recieve some sort of punishment for not doing so, as he is creating a ever-growing reason for a major war that will effect not just Chellis, not just the attacking nation, but NATO, RWC, and many, many other alliances and nations.
Vastiva
22-11-2004, 09:00
Repeat: Not a NATO matter. Talk to Chellis.
The Merchant Guilds
22-11-2004, 10:19
OOC: Are we going to get on with this meeting then?