OOC- NATO Versus NWO
Shalrirorchia
18-11-2004, 17:44
An earlier thread of mine has somehow disappeared, so I will ask these questions again the hopes of answers.
What do NATO and NWO stand for (as in global political bloc standing)? I seek to understand the political relationships.
Kryozerkia
18-11-2004, 17:51
NATO - New Alliance Treaty Organization
NWO - Neo-con Worldly Obnoxious-worthy-assholes. ;)
Dr_Twist
18-11-2004, 17:54
NATO - New Alliance Treaty Organization
NWO - Neo-con Worldly Obnoxious-worthy-assholes. ;)
Stop Baiting/Flaming!
NWO - New World Order
Kryozerkia
18-11-2004, 18:00
Stop Baiting/Flaming!
NWO - New World Order
Obviously you don't understand sarcasm...hence, why I inserted the winky-smile.
Caldaron
18-11-2004, 18:21
Neither want the Caldaron Soviet Union as a member so, I would say both are...regrettable :P
I think Shalrirorchia wants more to know what it is that the NWO and NATO champion as collective goals and outlooks, rather than the meanings of the acronyms.
Which is actually something I would like to know my own self. What the heck ARE y'all for/against?
Praetonia
18-11-2004, 19:14
NATO and NWO, as far as I can work out, both stand for furthering the goals of their members. They dont really stand for anything much...
Shalrirorchia
18-11-2004, 19:29
I'm not particularly taking a shine ICly to the NWO, since they seem to be interested in expanding their power at the cost of others. That is something Shalrirorchia has consistently resisted.
NATO - it should be pointed out - has been accused of everything from baby poaching to landgrabbing.
However, twenty minutes in the stacks will prove NATO has never performed a single offensive action as a first strike on any nation.
In short, NATO doesn't beat up on others, unless they beat on NATO first.
Praedonia
19-11-2004, 07:35
OOC: I would advise you to stay out of both to be honest. There's a large chance that there'll be massive alliance-on-alliance wars, whereas right now you're fairly unknown and with unknown affliations, and so are probably safe.
The Parthians
19-11-2004, 07:38
NATO - it should be pointed out - has been accused of everything from baby poaching to landgrabbing.
However, twenty minutes in the stacks will prove NATO has never performed a single offensive action as a first strike on any nation.
In short, NATO doesn't beat up on others, unless they beat on NATO first.
Communist Mississippi/ Decisive Action... that was an offensive action.
Automagfreek
19-11-2004, 07:38
NATO - it should be pointed out - has been accused of everything from baby poaching to landgrabbing.
OOC: Well....AMF does have a rather efficient black market in baby poaching. ;)
New_Osea
19-11-2004, 07:58
Well :sniper: Is NWO kind of like affilated with people who want world domination? O_o because that what it sounds like, or are they just the general OPFOR against nato?
McLeod03
19-11-2004, 08:06
OOC: Neither. We work simply for the betterment of member nations, and the defence of our lands against outside threats.
imported_ViZion
19-11-2004, 08:12
OOC: Neither. We work simply for the betterment of member nations, and the defence of our lands against outside threats.
OOC: Well stated. Simple but to the point. :)
New_Osea
19-11-2004, 10:45
OOC: SO your nato..... but a non french/germany having, UN Not obeying, not ##### Footing around kind of NATO?
Moleland
19-11-2004, 10:48
Tag
The Merchant Guilds
19-11-2004, 11:01
NATO gets accused of many untrue things, but to be quite honest somethings are blatently true :) like the AMF baby kidnapping scandal (I always wondered where his super soldiers came from ;) ).
Moleland
19-11-2004, 11:03
Ooc: Lol