NationStates Jolt Archive


The NATO Charter

Automagfreek
12-08-2004, 01:38
Here is the proposed charter of the New Alliance Treaty Organization. Current members are urged to comment on the contents of this charter.

THIS IS NOT THE RECRUITMENT THREAD, SO DO NOT ASK TO JOIN NATO HERE.

*************

*The New Alliance Treaty Organization shall herein be referred to as NATO.

*Member Nations are urged to open trade routes with one another. Not every nation must open routes with all consistent members, but trade and interaction on some level is preferred.

*Nations may not petition to join NATO soley for membership and no other action. Upholding of this charter and the responsibilities and duties that come with the status of a NATO member is required. Inactivity or failure to follow the rules and guidelines of this charter will result in a review/dismissal of said nation's membership status.

*Active and Respected Member of the International Community. (OOC: Reputable RP record.)

*Nations may apply for Economic Boost Packages, Defensive Boost Packages, and other benefits that will be exclusive to NATO members.

*Nations may petition for a redress of grievances in a International Consortium Court, if they believe a member nation has acted unaccordingly to the Charter. The court will be a panel of 3 persons from nations that do not hold cabinet positions, therein creating a 'check and balance' system. This 3 person panel shall be known as the International Consortium Court.

*No nation may attack another nation within NATO, period. All grievances must be brought before the International Consortium Court. Those nations that do attack a member naton will be expelled from NATO immediatly, and summarily have sanctions placed upon them.

* All nations are given the right to rule in sovereignty, NATO, the International Consortium Court, may not pass any statute that interferes with the sovereignty of a member nation. Save in place of sanctions or other disciplinary actions that may be decided upon by the International Consortium Court.

*NATO shall be ran by a singular individual, and an appointed Congressional Board. This board shall consist of five nations, appointed by a majority vote from Automagfreek, Sigma Octavus, and Celack.

*The International Consortium Court shall be appointed by the head of NATO, with an approval measure of 75% majority vote from the Congressional Board.

*The head of NATO may propose a new amendment to this charter, or to remove an existing one. The Congressional Board shall decide to remove or add by a 75% majority vote in accordance witht eh head of NATO's wishes.

*In cases of tied votes in the Congressional Board, the head of NATO will make the final decision.


*The head of NATO shall hold Executive Authority to declare an Emergency state on a trade route or Nation/State, and deploy NATO forces to protect them/it. If after 45 days the Congressional Board decides that there is no Emergency Situation, or the situation no longer requires NATO forces, they may, by a 50% Majority vote, order the withdrawal of forces.

*The Board shall hold the authority to approve or disapprove membership, to a petitioning Nation. This action can be vetoed by the head of NATO if just cause against the applying nation is shown.


*All NATO member nations must stand ready to commit military forces in any conflict against a NATO member. While not required to go to war immediately when when a conflict arises, all members must be ready and on alert if the Congressional Board feels that said member is innocent of provocation. Provocation of a attack without NATO approval will result in an emergency meeting of the Congressional Board to discuss the situation and rule on it accordingly. Suspension of NATO membership for unjustified aggression can result at any time by either a 50% vote from the Congressional Board, a 50% vote from the International Consortium Court, or a singular vote by the head of NATO. This action can only be appealed by a member of the Board or the Court, and NOT by the member in question.

*****************
imported_Illior
12-08-2004, 01:41
OOC:hmm... i think i should join after reading that, nice work on that AMF... is that basicly a copy of the previous one(wouldn't know due to being inactive for about 5 months)?
Automagfreek
12-08-2004, 01:42
OOC:hmm... i think i should join after reading that, nice work on that AMF... is that basicly a copy of the previous one(wouldn't know due to being inactive for about 5 months)?


OOC: That is a modified copy of Tersanctus's ICEP charter, which was a copy of my UCEP charter. So yeah, it's an old charter originally composed by me.
The Island of Rose
12-08-2004, 01:44
OOC: Five people and one ultimate leader? Eh, restricts democracy a bit, call me a bleedin heart liberal if you wanna :p
Automagfreek
12-08-2004, 01:50
OOC: Five people and one ultimate leader? Eh, restricts democracy a bit, call me a bleedin heart liberal if you wanna :p


OOC: . . .

This is a democratic system! One person in the highest office, and others 'below' him to keep him in check. The Court and Board can overrule the 'head' if they feel it is neccessary, and the 'head' can veto their resolutions. Sounds like democracy to me, and I RP a dictatorship!
Soviet Bloc
12-08-2004, 01:50
The ARSB feels that this charter covers all necessary points to maintaining a viable and productive alliance. We, at this time, find absolutely nothing wrong with the charter and agree on all principles it puts forward.

The ARSB would have no hesitation in accepting it.
The Island of Rose
12-08-2004, 02:00
OOC: . . .

This is a democratic system! One person in the highest office, and others 'below' him to keep him in check. The Court and Board can overrule the 'head' if they feel it is neccessary, and the 'head' can veto their resolutions. Sounds like democracy to me, and I RP a dictatorship!


OOC: So then the non congressionals will have to convince the congressies?
Automagfreek
12-08-2004, 02:05
OOC: So then the non congressionals will have to convince the congressies?


OOC: Not exactly sure what you meant by that specifically, but the best example I have is the way the US is run.

Citizens (or in NATO, regular member nations) can make appeals/suggestions to Congress (our Congressional Board), and they will subsequently vote on it. If there are grievances, it is taken before the courts (our International Consortium Court). Same basic principles of the US. And to those reading this, this is not the place to debate US policy. It is an example.

Hope that helps.
IDF
12-08-2004, 02:12
OOC: Looks good, I suggest that a private message board be set up for NATO.
Automagfreek
12-08-2004, 02:26
http://s4.invisionfree.com/NATO_forums

Message board is up. Those that have been accepted can register.
Scandavian States
12-08-2004, 02:32
[Simple and straight forward, I like it.]
Omz222
12-08-2004, 02:43
OOC: Not too complicated, and easy to understand.

But once concern for the last one - what if (let's say) the attacking nation (whom is attacking NATO Member A) has some form of a nonaggression pact or is even friendly to NATO Member B? Since getting B's forces involved in the conflict would break the pact/etc., would it be okay, in this case, for B to not participate (or give secret aid to NATO Member A)?
Automagfreek
12-08-2004, 02:45
OOC: Not too complicated, and easy to understand.

But once concern for the last one - what if (let's say) the attacking nation (whom is attacking NATO Member A) has some form of a nonaggression pact or is even friendly to NATO Member B? Since getting B's forces involved in the conflict would break the pact/etc., would it be okay, in this case, for B to not participate (or give secret aid to NATO Member A)?


OOC: Under those circumstances, yes.
Hamptonshire
13-08-2004, 02:52
Very nice treaty, it's something I can certainly agree to.

I'll register on the forum when I can (within 2-3 days).
Automagfreek
13-08-2004, 19:24
Bump