NationStates Jolt Archive


Jangle Jangle Ridge Attempt at Preemptive Nuclear Attack on Takatori under Fire

Takatori
05-08-2004, 09:47
Jangle Jangle Ridge Attempt at Preemptive Nuclear Attack on Takatori under Fire
Authorized Release

Tengunbashi, August 5 -- Koumin Sinbun today in a signed article denounces the Jangle Jangle Ridge imperialists for their reckless attempt to mount a preemptive nuclear attack on Takatori. The article says:

The Jangle Jangle Ridge bellicose forces have made preparations to invade Takatori for the last several decades as evidenced by their massive beef-up of their aggression forces in and around North Pacific, specifically in the neighboring region of Australia where they recently put forth an illegal attack against Steel Island for base motives of profit and revenge. Considering it as a major goal of their military strategy for overseas aggression to stifle Takatori, they have now focused all their efforts on achieving this goal. They are keen to ignite another trans-regional war under the pretext of being "appaled by these accustations[sic]".

The Jangle Jangle Ridge imperialists count on a preemptive nuclear attack in achieving the objective of their scenario for a war of aggression against Takatori. This scenario has already been into a concrete shape. Having succeeded in developing missiles capable of unannounced satellite launch as tested against the undefended Steel Island nation, the Jangle Jangle Ridge imperialists are contemplating their deployment in the North Pacific before any other regions. It is their intention to ignite a nuclear war in the North Pacific and with this as a precedent start the same war to invade other regions in the future. That is why the Jangle Jangle Ridge is taking so much pain to input other countries such as the puppet "Akaton" into its move to lay an international siege to Takatori and apply collective sanctions against Takatori.

Their reckless game of contradictory denial and admission is clearly evident in their arrogant and agressive public statements that have been seen before: http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=344949 and their pre-violence belligerence is unquestionably demonstrated even in the face of opposition by the anti-war factions of the international picture such as "Tahar Joblis" who voiced appropriate rejection of Jangle Jangle Islands wanton rush to war: http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=344569

The Jangle Jangle Ridge imperialists make the outbreak of a nuclear war in the North Pacific an established fact on the basis of their calculation that they can use nukes in this region, unhindered, and their use will not have any impact on their mainland across oceans. If the Jangle Jangle Ridge bellicose forces ignite a nuclear war in the North Pacific at any cost, the Jangle Jangle Ridge will not be safe from it, either. The "impatient fellow" Tarenteor's bellicose elements are well advised to drop such daydream and stop the nuclear war racket.
Jangle Jangle Ridge
05-08-2004, 18:18
... >.> <.< <.> >.<... Since when have I aimed nuclear weapons at you? I only do that to people that have islands I want to RP on.
Jangle Jangle Ridge
05-08-2004, 18:22
I'm a person too, you know. *cries*
Takatori
06-08-2004, 14:49
High ranking officials of the Takatori administration are painting the issue of Jangle Jangle Ridge's nuclear ambitions demonstrated against Steel Island as a "dangerous and serious problem" which should be brought up for discussion at the United Nations, without distorting and hyping it.

This belligerent behavior is nothing but a rash action which can convince no one as it is like putting the cart before the horse. The commentary cites facts to prove that Jangle Jangle is to blame for rendering the nuclear issue dangerous and serious.

Now the Jangle Jangle Ridge administration is working hard to bridge over the serious political crisis created due to its wrong foreign policy come what may and create an atmosphere favorable for their aims.

The heavyweights of the Jangle Jandle Ridge administration are seriously mistaken if they calculate they can retrieve their foreign policy failure through this offensive.

In order to settle the nuclear issue, Jangle Jangle Ridge should clarify its commitment to observe the principle of "words for words" and "action for action" and honestly fulfill it.

It is an undisguised escape from reality and the evasion of responsibility to waste time, refusing to fulfill its commitment and finding fault with others.

Jangle Jangle Ridge should behave in good faith with a political decision as it is a party directly responsible for the settlement of the nuclear issue. A complete indemnity against the use of Jangle Jangle Ridge's nuclear capabilities for offensive unprovoked attacks is admonished, and the peoples in both sides' nations will "breathe sigh of relief" to recognize their joint denunciation and liquidation of past acts. Takatori permanently and without prejudice has foresworn the unprovoked use of the national collective defense and urges Jangle Jangle Ridge to follow suit to defuse the danger of proliferation of mass-destructive weaponry.
Takatori
06-08-2004, 14:56
Kinmon Nanboku, presidential assistant of the Presidium of the Supreme People's Assembly of Takatori, sends a message of greetings to Jangle Jangle Ridge's leadership. Expressing the belief that the creation of normalized relations of friendship and cooperation between the two countries will expand and develop in conformity with the mutual interests of the two peoples. Takatori wishes to the leadership and the people of Jangle Jangle Ridge new achievements in their work for the prosperity of the country.

In conciliatory interest and gesture of "open-hands" friendship towards promoting swift resolution of the imperialist nuclear belligerence issue, leadership representatives from Jangle Jangle Ridge according to security and national interests, are invited with minimal retinue for attendance at open exhibitions of Takatori technological and classical period works of industry presently under promotion.

http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?t=346281
http://forums2.jolt.co.uk/showthread.php?p=6720772