NationStates Jolt Archive

Fraser united a brand new nation has declaired that they vow to become a super nation by showing its ability in war with any other nation that dares

we Dare Challenge you.

((Haven't you already posted this thread?))

And I thought that my threads where stupid.

we Dare Challenge you.

You do? Shall you expect another nuke waiting?

The Protectorate of Anaristas publicly states that any nation basing itself solely on the predicate of war has historically come to nought but ruin and self-destruction. The regrettably poor tactician know as Napoleon(the rather brief french empire); the emotionally unstable Hister (the so called 3rd reich, lasting only 10 or so of its projected 1000 years) should be example enough ofthe ridiculousness of this proposed project.

- The Anarcho-Syndicate

We dare mock you.

With a population of a measly five million, you will be swiftly crushed by most other nations if you engage in war with them. Please do not do something so immature as try to start wars, especially arbitrary ones. Think of nations with populations of 500 million, or 1.5 BILLION, all of those nations that could obliterate your newb self. Think of nations that can actually RP!

By the way, Suna Kaya has no intention to attack Fraser United. Your nation has the right to advance and mature, but it is your decision to allow yourself to be attacked in order to attempt to show your military might.

Sigh.
We really dislike war mongers.
We'll just invade you and then show you what a nation of over 2.5 billion can do to a belligerent nation like yours.

The regrettably poor tactician know as Napoleon(the rather brief french empire)

Actually, Napoleon was one of the greatest tacticians of his age, perhaps second only to Wellington. In fact, he only won Waterloo, and would have if the Prussians had been lost for only a few minutes more.....if that had happened it is likely much of Europe would currently be French. The only ones he couldn't beat were the British, as he hadn't the Navy to invade Britain.

http://upl.silentwhisper.net/uplfolders/upload6/bull.GIF

The regrettably poor tactician know as Napoleon(the rather brief french empire)

Actually, Napoleon was one of the greatest tacticians of his age, perhaps second only to Wellington. In fact, he only won Waterloo, and would have if the Prussians had been lost for only a few minutes more.....if that had happened it is likely much of Europe would currently be French. The only ones he couldn't beat were the British, as he hadn't the Navy to invade Britain.


ok, I over-emphasized his poorness as a tactician, I really should have pointed out his poor strategy. C'mon, Russia? hello? I have never understood the heaps of praise poured upon this bloody-minded general. If he did anything right, it was in communications.

And I thought that my threads where stupid.
same here...lol :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :shock: