NationStates Jolt Archive

all people against the UN should read
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=146905&highlight=
and those who are not already in a group this one.
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=153726&highlight=
comments on both welcome

bump

bump

hope people read both of them got to wait a while to find out thou

bump

uh bump

Fuggolia deams all nations against the UN to be misguided and rather foolish.

The Enlightened Dictator of The Allied States of Opal Isle deams all nations to be misguided and rather foolish. Included the state of Opal Isle itself, as no state is in a position to know who is right and who is wrong in the end as time travel has been proven an impossibility by scientists that the Opal Isle Chronolab. Guess it's back to making clocks.

dude, they made abortion legal in all countries! How dare they! My country should not be forced to abide by such disgusting regulations! The UN has overstepped its bounds.

Well, I'm sure as h*** anti-UN.

dude, they made abortion legal in all countries! How dare they! My country should not be forced to abide by such disgusting regulations! The UN has overstepped its bounds.
no not really just member nations

Well, I'm sure as h*** anti-UN.
good to hear

My two cents: http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=154201

My opinion of nations who wish to 'destroy' the UN is that they are quite fascinating, really. And rather foolish, at that. Join the UN, organize, and put forth your pro-capitalist beliefs...(I'd agree on many counts, anyways)...you do that! That's good and healthy for the UN that people are actually organizing...

We don't want to destroy the UN. We just want real order instead of Socialist Anti-Capitalism like the UN. If you wish to join our treaty, move your nation to: Capital Treaty League

Actually, technically, abortion was never defined. Thereby, by the definition on dictionary.com, all you have to do is allow woman the choice of whether or not to have a monstrosity, to quote dictionary.com.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Abortion

And, to quote and bold what I'm talking about...


a·bor·tion ( P ) Pronunciation Key (-bôrshn)
n.

Termination of pregnancy and expulsion of an embryo or of a fetus that is incapable of survival.
Any of various procedures that result in such termination and expulsion. Also called induced abortion.
The premature expulsion of a nonviable fetus from the uterus; a miscarriage.
Cessation of normal growth, especially of an organ or other body part, prior to full development or maturation.
An aborted organism.
Something malformed or incompletely developed; a monstrosity.

So if you left the UN because you don't believe in child abortions, then you might want to reconsider.

The Commonwealth of Seversky does not now nor has ever recongonized the United Nations. We also openly defy all of the UN resolutions that we feel like defying. And noone dares to oppose us.

The Commonwealth of Seversky does not now nor has ever recongonized the United Nations. We also openly defy all of the UN resolutions that we feel like defying. And noone dares to oppose us.
best of luck on staying that way

Seversky, I ask though, do you feel the movement of the CTL was necessary, and hey, I've got an idea, why don't we make a big post to discuss the UN instead of having two threads?

Seversky, I ask though, do you feel the movement of the CTL was necessary, and hey, I've got an idea, why don't we make a big post to discuss the UN instead of having two threads?
one is a recruitment thing aside people are way more likely to read this one then the other. one sounds extreme and the other sounds less so. (and also with you're topic its three)

Uhm...

Pronouns require antecedents.
People clearly are way more likely to read the other one as it has more posts, and probably more views too. I will check right after I post this.

Survey says: Anti-UN = 20 posts, 112 views; Anti-anti-UN = 29 posts, 149 views.

And a sidenote, the Anti-anti-UN is more popular, and has only been up since: Fri Jun 18, 2004 9:57 pm
But the Anti-UN has been up since: Fri Jun 18, 2004 1:20 am

That's a whole 20 hours and 37 minutes longer...

argh argh argh ok start at the top and going down god stop 5t with the english i am serious you don't have a good arguments because you keep posting about my english, and by the way it doesn't just longer rants.

-=this post deleted by me=-

Uhm...

Pronouns require antecedents.
People clearly are way more likely to read the other one as it has more posts, and probably more views too. I will check right after I post this.

Survey says: Anti-UN = 20 posts, 112 views; Anti-anti-UN = 29 posts, 149 views.

And a sidenote, the Anti-anti-UN is more popular, and has only been up since: Fri Jun 18, 2004 9:57 pm
But the Anti-UN has been up since: Fri Jun 18, 2004 1:20 am

That's a whole 20 hours and 37 minutes longer...
yeah becasue every one is all like wah hoo about mine so old geting tired of hearing about this, and you have a weird one.

http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=154255