NationStates Jolt Archive


Creation of the Free Peoples Protection Pact

Germanische Zustande
14-06-2004, 06:27
The Federation of Germanic Worlds and the Attikan Reich have formed this organization to protect the sacred values of democracies, republics, constitutional monarchies, from communists, fascists, and socialists who would seek to destroy these values that so many free men and women hold dear. We ask that all nations, big and small, join in the defense of the cause of Freedom and Liberty.

Current Members:

The Federation of Germanic Worlds
The Attikan Reich
Germanische Zustande
14-06-2004, 06:48
People, join now to protect yourselves from countries who would do harm to the ideals of the countries where Freedom is valued. In other words, BUMP
Germanische Zustande
14-06-2004, 07:01
Must... Not... Succumb... To... Communist... Hordes... <BUMP>
Germanische Zustande
14-06-2004, 07:09
Look, I know that I'm not the only Free country. Is it the name? That can be changed.
Germanische Zustande
14-06-2004, 17:57
bump...
The Island of Rose
14-06-2004, 18:23
Eh... I'm communist/socialist and I'm a democracy... that's very hurtful...
14-06-2004, 18:26
Erm...might one argue that monarchies tend to be just as oppressive as dictatorships? Seems dictatorship is just a fancy new word for monarchy. One ruler. Granted there were some benevolent monarchies, just like there may today be a benevolent dictator that crops up every now and then. But to say a monarchy is more free than a communist or fascist state? Doesn't seem right. And you live in a region with Fascist right in the name.
Germanische Zustande
15-06-2004, 05:27
Yeah, I originally wanted to be Fascist, but my views changed... I have to create a new region... But, I meant, and hoped people would understand, a CONSTITUTIONAL monarchy. Like Britan. It just wouldn't fit. Sorry.

Also, Attikan Empire, this is the pact we were talking about...
Germanische Zustande
15-06-2004, 06:47
Also, the stupid poll wouldn't let me put in any more than three options. Otherwise, the poll would have been better.
Muktar
15-06-2004, 06:49
COMMUNISM IS NOT OPRESSIVE! WHAT YOU CONSIDER OPRESSIVE ARE BOTCHED ATTEMPTS AT COMMUNISM! I suggest you swap communism with monarchy, since monarchy is authoritarian.
JiangGuo
15-06-2004, 06:51
One could always argue that democracy is an oppressive government by the majority.

JiangGuo
Germanische Zustande
15-06-2004, 06:52
I don't think so. In a true communism, of which there have never been any in the history of the world, since the gov't would be in control of everything, there is no way with a gov't that large that corruption or power-hungriness will not be prevalent. It simply will not work. So, even if some country starts out with good intentions, they will inevitably end up in a terrible mess.
Magdha
15-06-2004, 06:57
Magdha is an absolute-benevolent monarchy.

I treat my people well and give them many rights.
Muktar
15-06-2004, 06:59
Magdha is an absolute-benevolent monarchy.

I treat my people well and give them many rights.Yet your nation is a wasteland where the homeless are murdered, the venerable work heavy machinery, and the only thing hindering your economic engine is a crime rate that is unsurpassed.
Magdha
15-06-2004, 07:01
Magdha is an absolute-benevolent monarchy.

I treat my people well and give them many rights.Yet your nation is a wasteland where the homeless are murdered, the venerable work heavy machinery, and the only thing hindering your economic engine is a crime rate that is unsurpassed.

High crime is inevitable with many rights, but it's a price i'm willing to pay.
Muktar
15-06-2004, 07:02
Actually, crime is lowered by two things: police funding and good education.
Magdha
15-06-2004, 07:07
Actually, crime is lowered by two things: police funding and good education.

I don't want to dump money on socialist education, tell them to get a real job.
Muktar
15-06-2004, 07:09
That would probably lower civil rights, but may count toward police funding. And they can't get a job without an education, thus they commit crime to make money.