FuealCuba
04-06-2004, 05:48
PLEASE APPROVE THE FOLLOWING PROPOSAL.
The Value Of Life
PREFACE;
Recently, a resolution was passed in favor of AbortionRights. It is not Moral Decency that is the nature of my resolution, but the basic human right of life, for one to take the life of another is the most trechorous act of humanity, but for one to take the life of the most innocent creature in existence, (THE HUMAN FETUS), this is both INCOMPREHENSIBLE AND INEXCUSEABLE, NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO TAKE THE LIFE OF ANOTHER, IT MATTERS NOT IF THE AUDIENCE OF THIS RESOLUTION IS SYMPATHETIC TO ATHIEST VIEWS OR EVANJELISTIC VIEWS, FOR STILL IN EVERY OTHER CASE IT WOULD COMMONLY BE SAID BY BOTH THAT MURDER OF A HUMAN LIFE IS WRONG!!!!
FURTHER MORE I SHALL GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE AND A PERSONAL DESCRIPTION ON THE CASE OF ABORTION.
EX. Big Enchillada, Delegate of The Rgion of Cuba
-
"It's not just woman's body, when she is pregnant, her body also belongs to her child (a womans body is her own businness my @$$) If the baby is important enough to take over the bodily functions and dictate and person's life for 9 months, then it's alive. And abortion is killing it. "
DESCRIPTION. THIS IS DESCRIPTION WAS AN ACTUAL EVENT THAT OCCURED ON THE 7TH OF APRIL, 1997 ;
BARBARA CASIDANA WAS SCHEDUELED FOR AN ABORTION AT 8 A.M. THAT APRIL MORNING, SHE WAS ABORTING A CHILD CONCIVED BY HER AND HER NEW HUSBAND. HIS NAME WAS GOING TO BE MIKEL.
AS SHE ENTERED THE SURGERY ROOM, SHE FELT A GUSH OF WATER FROM HER MATERNAL AREA, HER WATER HAD JUST BROKE, SPEACHLESS SHE PROCEEDED TO THE OOPERATION TABLE, AND TOOK HER POSITION, SHE WAS ENJECTED WITH MORPHINE, AND THE MEDICAL SOURGENS COMMENCED WITH THE ABORTION, FIRST REMOVING THE CRANIUM, I HEARD THE CHILD SREECH WHEN THEY HAD ACCEDENTALLY NOT APPLIED ENOUGH PRESSURE WITH THE TOOL THEY WERE USING FOR THE ABORTION, THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN COMMEMORATED AS THE CHILD'S FIRST BREATH OF LIFE, BUT SILENCE SOON FOLLOWED IN THE ABORTION ROOM, THE SOURGENS PROCEEDED TO REMOVE THE REST OF THE CORPSE FROM BARBRA, WHEN FINISHED THEY DISCARDED THE CORPSE IN A DISPOSAL CONTAINER, THEN THEY RETURNED TO WORK ON THE VITALS OF BARBARA, SHE HAD DIED DURING THE ABORTION.
TO THIS DAY I HOLD NO REMORSE FOR MY STEPMOTHER,
ONLY SADNESS AND ANGER PRODUCED BY THE MURDER OF MY BROTHER, I WAS WITNESS TO THE ENTIRE ACCOUNT,
-----
I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHICH OF YOU WOULD ENDORSE AND GIVE CONCENT WITH THE MURDER OF MY BROTHER,............................................................................................ ............. WHICH OF YOU WOULD THINK IT HUMANITARIAN AND CIVIL TO CARRY OUT THIS TASK, TO BE WITNESS TO IT, TO DIE IN THE WAY HE DIED.......ANYONE?
I HAVE CHOSEN TO BE A STRONG VOICE IN ALL AREAS OF SOCIETY ON ANTI-ABORTIONISM BECAUSE OF THIS EVENT, TAKE ME SERIOUSLY, FOR THIS IS NOT A JOKE, YES I WOULD EVEN GO TO THE MEANIOR LEVEL OF THE NATIONSTATES UN, TO PROTEST THIS ATROCITY.
I WILL NOW PRESENT TO YOU THE TERMS OF THE RESOLUTION;
First Act. the AbortionRights Resolution is to be de-enacted as UN policy.
Second Act. No other proposal on abortion shall over-rule this one.
Third Act. All members of the UN are to acknowledge human life at the moment of concivement.
Fourth Act. There is to be zero-tolerance amongst UN members who reject this resolution.
DO WHAT IS HUMANE :cry:
The Value Of Life
PREFACE;
Recently, a resolution was passed in favor of AbortionRights. It is not Moral Decency that is the nature of my resolution, but the basic human right of life, for one to take the life of another is the most trechorous act of humanity, but for one to take the life of the most innocent creature in existence, (THE HUMAN FETUS), this is both INCOMPREHENSIBLE AND INEXCUSEABLE, NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO TAKE THE LIFE OF ANOTHER, IT MATTERS NOT IF THE AUDIENCE OF THIS RESOLUTION IS SYMPATHETIC TO ATHIEST VIEWS OR EVANJELISTIC VIEWS, FOR STILL IN EVERY OTHER CASE IT WOULD COMMONLY BE SAID BY BOTH THAT MURDER OF A HUMAN LIFE IS WRONG!!!!
FURTHER MORE I SHALL GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE AND A PERSONAL DESCRIPTION ON THE CASE OF ABORTION.
EX. Big Enchillada, Delegate of The Rgion of Cuba
-
"It's not just woman's body, when she is pregnant, her body also belongs to her child (a womans body is her own businness my @$$) If the baby is important enough to take over the bodily functions and dictate and person's life for 9 months, then it's alive. And abortion is killing it. "
DESCRIPTION. THIS IS DESCRIPTION WAS AN ACTUAL EVENT THAT OCCURED ON THE 7TH OF APRIL, 1997 ;
BARBARA CASIDANA WAS SCHEDUELED FOR AN ABORTION AT 8 A.M. THAT APRIL MORNING, SHE WAS ABORTING A CHILD CONCIVED BY HER AND HER NEW HUSBAND. HIS NAME WAS GOING TO BE MIKEL.
AS SHE ENTERED THE SURGERY ROOM, SHE FELT A GUSH OF WATER FROM HER MATERNAL AREA, HER WATER HAD JUST BROKE, SPEACHLESS SHE PROCEEDED TO THE OOPERATION TABLE, AND TOOK HER POSITION, SHE WAS ENJECTED WITH MORPHINE, AND THE MEDICAL SOURGENS COMMENCED WITH THE ABORTION, FIRST REMOVING THE CRANIUM, I HEARD THE CHILD SREECH WHEN THEY HAD ACCEDENTALLY NOT APPLIED ENOUGH PRESSURE WITH THE TOOL THEY WERE USING FOR THE ABORTION, THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN COMMEMORATED AS THE CHILD'S FIRST BREATH OF LIFE, BUT SILENCE SOON FOLLOWED IN THE ABORTION ROOM, THE SOURGENS PROCEEDED TO REMOVE THE REST OF THE CORPSE FROM BARBRA, WHEN FINISHED THEY DISCARDED THE CORPSE IN A DISPOSAL CONTAINER, THEN THEY RETURNED TO WORK ON THE VITALS OF BARBARA, SHE HAD DIED DURING THE ABORTION.
TO THIS DAY I HOLD NO REMORSE FOR MY STEPMOTHER,
ONLY SADNESS AND ANGER PRODUCED BY THE MURDER OF MY BROTHER, I WAS WITNESS TO THE ENTIRE ACCOUNT,
-----
I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHICH OF YOU WOULD ENDORSE AND GIVE CONCENT WITH THE MURDER OF MY BROTHER,............................................................................................ ............. WHICH OF YOU WOULD THINK IT HUMANITARIAN AND CIVIL TO CARRY OUT THIS TASK, TO BE WITNESS TO IT, TO DIE IN THE WAY HE DIED.......ANYONE?
I HAVE CHOSEN TO BE A STRONG VOICE IN ALL AREAS OF SOCIETY ON ANTI-ABORTIONISM BECAUSE OF THIS EVENT, TAKE ME SERIOUSLY, FOR THIS IS NOT A JOKE, YES I WOULD EVEN GO TO THE MEANIOR LEVEL OF THE NATIONSTATES UN, TO PROTEST THIS ATROCITY.
I WILL NOW PRESENT TO YOU THE TERMS OF THE RESOLUTION;
First Act. the AbortionRights Resolution is to be de-enacted as UN policy.
Second Act. No other proposal on abortion shall over-rule this one.
Third Act. All members of the UN are to acknowledge human life at the moment of concivement.
Fourth Act. There is to be zero-tolerance amongst UN members who reject this resolution.
DO WHAT IS HUMANE :cry: