NationStates Jolt Archive


Let me clear something up about FWS

18-05-2004, 04:12
My nation is current timeline. Modern... No future star wars, underground armies, etc, crap... We are the here and now... We don't deal with 2010 etc.

We are basically the current technology and maybe minor-medium upgrades to things already in existence.
Khostovan
18-05-2004, 04:14
Don't you still think you should think of your future. What if your region is conquered. You must think of your future military developments. :?
Magdha
18-05-2004, 04:21
Are my JSFs and Spacebased weapons ok?
18-05-2004, 04:21
Don't you still think you should think of your future. What if your region is conquered. You must think of your future military developments. :?


We're not going to have underground assault vehicles, super death rays, the death star, imperial battle cruisers etc... We're not training a clone army, no beam me up scotty.
18-05-2004, 04:21
Are my JSFs and Spacebased weapons ok?

JSFS? Joint-Strike-Fighters??? Since they are basically all but completed by the USA and Europe then yes they'd be okay. But Space based weapons??? Not sure... What do you think?
Magdha
18-05-2004, 04:23
Are my JSFs and Spacebased weapons ok?

JSFS? Joint-Strike-Fighters??? Since they are basically all but completed by the USA and Europe then yes they'd be okay. But Space based weapons??? Not sure... What do you think?

It's basically satellites with missiles mounted on them which fire onto earth with amazing precision.
Utopiaism
18-05-2004, 04:25
what is the diff betwen JSF and regular fighters???
Utopiaism
18-05-2004, 04:26
Are my JSFs and Spacebased weapons ok?

JSFS? Joint-Strike-Fighters??? Since they are basically all but completed by the USA and Europe then yes they'd be okay. But Space based weapons??? Not sure... What do you think?

It's basically satellites with missiles mounted on them which fire onto earth with amazing precision.

Hell i bet some post Cold war satilite have those already.
Rotovia
18-05-2004, 04:26
I have a blanket ignore of all space/post-modern/future tech. I would encourage you to do the same as a Modern Tech nation RPing with FurtureTech is inane and ruins good RPs.
Irondin
18-05-2004, 04:27
Are my JSFs and Spacebased weapons ok?

JSFS? Joint-Strike-Fighters??? Since they are basically all but completed by the USA and Europe then yes they'd be okay. But Space based weapons??? Not sure... What do you think?

It's basically satellites with missiles mounted on them which fire onto earth with amazing precision.

star Wars (not the movie the US space based weapons syistion) yes if you got the money you can do it with monder techs
Rotovia
18-05-2004, 04:29
Are my JSFs and Spacebased weapons ok?

JSFS? Joint-Strike-Fighters??? Since they are basically all but completed by the USA and Europe then yes they'd be okay. But Space based weapons??? Not sure... What do you think?

It's basically satellites with missiles mounted on them which fire onto earth with amazing precision.

star Wars (not the movie the US space based weapons syistion) yes if you got the money you can do it with monder techsDoesn''t really matter, if FWS thinks it''s silly than he has the opinion of ignoring it.
Magdha
18-05-2004, 04:29
Are my JSFs and Spacebased weapons ok?

JSFS? Joint-Strike-Fighters??? Since they are basically all but completed by the USA and Europe then yes they'd be okay. But Space based weapons??? Not sure... What do you think?

It's basically satellites with missiles mounted on them which fire onto earth with amazing precision.

star Wars (not the movie the US space based weapons syistion) yes if you got the money you can do it with monder techs

I blow 60% of my budget on defense, i can afford it.
Belem
18-05-2004, 04:30
Are my JSFs and Spacebased weapons ok?

JSFS? Joint-Strike-Fighters??? Since they are basically all but completed by the USA and Europe then yes they'd be okay. But Space based weapons??? Not sure... What do you think?

It's basically satellites with missiles mounted on them which fire onto earth with amazing precision.

Hell i bet some post Cold war satilite have those already.

Easilly done only reason they didn't put a nuke on sat is because the U.N. banned them.
Utopiaism
18-05-2004, 04:31
ha ha I beat 75% gose to my army (another 5% to my police and another 5% to an underground poilceforce (my personal asssins.)
Magdha
18-05-2004, 04:33
ha ha I beat 75% gose to my army (another 5% to my police and another 5% to an underground poilceforce (my personal asssins.)

I can increase it, 10% goes to law and order, 10% for infastructure and 20% for other things. (We do not have a government funded educational system)
Rotovia
18-05-2004, 04:37
ha ha I beat 75% gose to my army (another 5% to my police and another 5% to an underground poilceforce (my personal asssins.)OOC: That''s godmodding, your nation would collapse if you spent that much on your military.
18-05-2004, 04:38
Credonia said his SDI has a 100% success rate... That is Royal god modding... Nothing is 100%
Belem
18-05-2004, 04:41
The average success rate for SDI on forum norms is 50-75% of shots fired will hit there mark. Of course that can be offsetted by an increased number of Sats. So technically its possible to have 100% success rate not because your sats are so good its you have enough sats to pick of the slack for the ones that missed.
Nova Hope
18-05-2004, 04:42
ooc: I dunno technically he can claim that as an unrepresentitive gov, it'd be very very damaging yes but that's what physcotic dictators do right?

As for Magdha with a represintive gov, well... It's possible albeit unlikely that his population suports that.
Magdha
18-05-2004, 04:43
ooc: I dunno technically he can claim that as an unrepresentitive gov, it'd be very very damaging yes but that's what physcotic dictators do right?

As for Magdha with a represintive gov, well... It's possible albeit unlikely that his population suports that.

I do not have represenative government. Its an absolute monarchy.
Nova Hope
18-05-2004, 04:48
ooc: I dunno technically he can claim that as an unrepresentitive gov, it'd be very very damaging yes but that's what physcotic dictators do right?

As for Magdha with a represintive gov, well... It's possible albeit unlikely that his population suports that.

I do not have represenative government. Its an absolute monarchy.

but you have some political freedoms allowed to your ppl. They don't get a say in gov affairs?
Magdha
18-05-2004, 04:53
ooc: I dunno technically he can claim that as an unrepresentitive gov, it'd be very very damaging yes but that's what physcotic dictators do right?

As for Magdha with a represintive gov, well... It's possible albeit unlikely that his population suports that.

I do not have represenative government. Its an absolute monarchy.

but you have some political freedoms allowed to your ppl. They don't get a say in gov affairs?

They can protest and petition, that is all.