NationStates Jolt Archive

To those of you who ma be aware and to the many of you who are not the region of fan fics writers paradise has recently ben involved in a war with my region called Over the hills and far away (OTHAFA

during this war the overly aggressive nations of seele nerv and more disputably pioneer government conducted acts of ethnic clensing and genocide on nations within OTHAFA

i call upon the countries of the world to join in the calling of war crime charges to be set up against these two

these proceeding will begin on monday 10th may 0900hrs GMT in the thread called anime jihad in the international incidents section

your presence and comments are more then welcome

Gvnr. Taylon's Log >>>

The NFA may have been war conscious at the start, but we are for this trail thing against the advanced members of our reigon...

Whilst we may go up for trail ourselves for preparing the heavy artillery, we will see this trail-y thing to the end, no matter what the result is!

End Log, replies are welcome! <<<

i apolagise for the delaying of the start of these proceedings those of you whom have read the anime jihad threat will see that i was indeed detain by "envoys" from chairmen keele whos purose was to silence me permantley

they were detained and will be giving evidence at the trial when it can begin

chairman keele you will answer to this

note to all security at these proceedings will now be stepped up for all members involed

Principles of the
Nuremberg Tribunal, 1950
No. 82

Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal. Adopted by the International Law Commission of the United Nations, 1950.
Introductory note: Under General Assembly Resolution 177 (II), paragraph (a), the International Law Commission was directed to "formulate the principles of international law recognized in the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal and in the judgment of the Tribunal." In the course of the consideration of this subject, the question arose as to whether or not the Commission should ascertain to what extent the principles contained in the Charter and judgment constituted principles of international law. The conclusion was that since the Nuremberg Principles had been affirmed by the General Assembly, the task entrusted to the
Commission was not to express any appreciation of these principles as principles of international law but merely to formulate them. The text below was adopted by the Commission at its second session. The Report of the Commission also contains commentaries on the principles (see Yearbook of the Intemational Law Commission, 1950, Vol. II, pp. 374-378).
Authentic text: English Text published in Report of the International Law Commission Covering its Second Session, 5 June-29 Duly 1950, Document A/1316, pp. 11-14.

Principle I
Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment.

Principle II
The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under international law.

Principle III
The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible Government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.

Principle IV
The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.

Principle V
Any person charged with a crime under international law has the right to a fair trial on the facts and law.

Principle Vl
The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under; international law:

Crimes against peace:
Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).

War crimes:
Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave-labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or illtreatment of prisoners of war, of persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.

Crimes against humanity:
Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhuman acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.

Principle VII
Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principles VI is a crime under international law.

I draw to the attention to the defendents the above passage

principal 3 and 4 may be of express interest to the defendents as im sure are the definitions of war crimes and crimes against humanity

the prosecutions case is currently being drawn together and will be presented shorted

find me one incident in which Chairman Keel commited these crimes, JUST 1!

find me one incident in which Chairman Keel commited these crimes, JUST 1!

oh where does the prosecution begin

i have remained quiet on this issue for far to long
just one you demand well the fact that your war was based solely on relgious grounds can be classed as a war against hunamity thus beging that one you crave so much

the reason i say this is becasue you use this war to force upon the world the views of anime on region at a time and it is becasue of this that you are on trial now

its simple ya gonna go down boyo :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: