NationStates Jolt Archive


The justification for war against Al Anbar

Whittier
29-03-2004, 07:11
A month ago, Al Anbar, under Saddam Hussein, invaded the tiny nation of kuwait. A coalition of nations forced him out.
After word, Saddam forced his own people to mutilate themselves in a fraudalent election in which no one was allowed to run against him.
A week ago, he invaded Lebanon and the world said nothing as Al Anbari troops marched into Beirut and began executing innocent civilians they accused of being terrorists. Al Anbari accused Lebanon of being a terrorist state without offering proof. We gave him the benefit of the doubt. Except that instead of installing an anti terror govt. Saddam chose to annex Lebanon instead.
Now, 3 days ago, Saddam invaded both Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.
Like Lebanon, he has used the issue of terrorism to excuse his illegal invasion of these nations and his annexation of them.
His troops violate the laws of war by dressing as civilians and hiding in civilian houses and using refugee columns to move weapons.
Just recently he placed weapons in the holy sites of Mecca and used them to fire on Coalition forces. Coalition forces had no choice but to return fire.
We all wanted a peaceful solution. Saddam, however, refused.
We gave a cease fire, and Saddam got a second chance at peace. All he had to do was leave Kuwait, Lebanon, and Saudi Arabia. Instead, he has been defiant, going so far as to endorse international terrorism.
The people of Eredron have chosen to appease Saddam. But until Saddam leave Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Lebanon, our forces will continue their mission to drive him out.
Saddam has even gone to the length of having his agents destabilize other nations. Al Khal is nation in point.
At one point, Saddam even threatened the destruction of Israel.
This is not about oil nor do we have territorial ambitions. This is about restoring the national soverignty of three nations who peaceloving people are devout muslims who don't deserve to be oppressed by the likes of Saddam Hussien. Once we have driven Saddam out, our forces will begin their withdrawal from the Middle East.
Despite the deceptions of Saddam Hussein, the coalition against him grows every day. And every day he grows more desperate. Leveling fictional accusations against those arrayed against him. In his effort to destroy the Coalition of Freedom.
Rest assured, the Coalition will not waver, until the devout muslims of Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Lebanon have their nations back.
Vrak
29-03-2004, 07:38
To: Whittier Diplomats
From: Vrak Diplomatic Corps
Subject: Middle East

We care not for what you do to Al Anbar. Just be sure to give our interests in that region a wide berth. We shall inform you of the details shortly.
Chellis
29-03-2004, 07:45
Chellis supports anti-Al Anbai actions, as long as no nations are occupied other than al anbari, even if its for peace. The other nations must be immediatly left after al anbari being droven out.
29-03-2004, 07:58
Al Anbar would like to point out the lies of this racist.

After word, Saddam forced his own people to mutilate themselves in a fraudalent election in which no one was allowed to run against him.

We would like to know for one, where we ever forced people do "mutilate" themselves. They were allowed to mark their ballot card with blood if they wished. There is nothing wrong with that. They were not forced to do anything. Those that showed their loyalty to the government of Al Anbar. Secondly, it was not "fraudulent." It was a refrendum: if the majority of people said 'yes' to keeping President Saddam Hussein in power, then it would not goto elections. If a majority did say 'no', then it would head into elections in which candidates would be allowed.

A week ago, he invaded Lebanon and the world said nothing as Al Anbari troops marched into Beirut and began executing innocent civilians they accused of being terrorists. Al Anbari accused Lebanon of being a terrorist state without offering proof. We gave him the benefit of the doubt. Except that instead of installing an anti terror govt. Saddam chose to annex Lebanon instead.

Lebanon declared war on Al Anbar first by allowing fundamentalists to raid Al Anbar military positions, kill civilians, and cause panic in Al Anbar. They did not make any attempt to stop those from returning back to Lebanon after they completed their terrorism. Before the war, they had been merged into the Lebanese Army. In effect, they declared war on us. We simply defended ourselves.

We also challenge you to show proof of where we "executed" civilians. We never did and never have. Another lie by Whittier.

Now, 3 days ago, Saddam invaded both Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.
Like Lebanon, he has used the issue of terrorism to excuse his illegal invasion of these nations and his annexation of them.

It is true. The leaders of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait have admitted to it and files found inside Saudi intelligence agencies prove this.

http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=135259&highlight=

His troops violate the laws of war by dressing as civilians and hiding in civilian houses and using refugee columns to move weapons.
Just recently he placed weapons in the holy sites of Mecca and used them to fire on Coalition forces. Coalition forces had no choice but to return fire.

We once again challenge Whittier to prove this. When did we ever 'move weapons in refugee columns'? We never placed any sort of weaponry within Mecca nor did we fire on your forces. You bombed the holy city and caused massive casualities and damage to the holy sites inside the city. Once again, proving your racist agenda to destroy the history of Islam.

We all wanted a peaceful solution. Saddam, however, refused.
We gave a cease fire, and Saddam got a second chance at peace. All he had to do was leave Kuwait, Lebanon, and Saudi Arabia. Instead, he has been defiant, going so far as to endorse international terrorism.

We challenge Whittier again to show where we have "endorsed international terrorism." We have never done such a thing.

Why should Al Anbar remove itself from a part of our nation? We will never give up our land to barbarians such as yourself. You are the ones that don't want peace and want to murder people. We have been willing to make peace, you have not.

At one point, Saddam even threatened the destruction of Israel.

We challenge Whittier again to provide proof! We have never done any such thing! We have lived peacefully with Israel.
29-03-2004, 08:01
As you can see, all of Whittier's claims are totally false. He is unable to provide evidence for any of these things. It is much like the war that "Little Bush" launched against Iraq in March of 2003. He was forced to admit defeat when none of his objectives were met and he was faced with overwhelming resistance by the people of Iraq.

Whittier shall be defeated. Racists have no place in the Arabian pennisula or the gulf.
Whittier
29-03-2004, 16:03
Al Anbar knows his time is up. He is desperate.
He seeks to divide the world coalition that has come against him.
But we have a message for Saddam Hussein.
Leave Saudi, Kuwait, and Lebanon now. Or be considered an international fugitive on the run from the international community.
29-03-2004, 20:15
Al Anbar knows his time is up. He is desperate.
He seeks to divide the world coalition that has come against him.
But we have a message for Saddam Hussein.
Leave Saudi, Kuwait, and Lebanon now. Or be considered an international fugitive on the run from the international community.

Whittier knows his war is based on lies. That is why he doesn't even try to prove his falsified claims. He will be the one on the run. Muslims worldwide have united in this struggle to defend our lands from these monsters. Whittier and his "coalition" is now the enemy of all true Muslims worldwide. Whittier will be defeated as was Russia in Afghanistan in the 1980's. Just as the US was defeated in 2003. The people have united to defeat the common enemy.
30-03-2004, 03:43
bump
Jarridia
30-03-2004, 04:04
Whiittier,

Jarridia fully supports your claims and attacks against Al Anbar. We are prepared to stand by your side and help as necessary as we have talked before. If you need anything: Infantry, Tanks, Air Craft, etc. We would be happy to ablige.

-President Branam of Jarridia
Whittier
30-03-2004, 04:20
Whiittier,

Jarridia fully supports your claims and attacks against Al Anbar. We are prepared to stand by your side and help as necessary as we have talked before. If you need anything: Infantry, Tanks, Air Craft, etc. We would be happy to ablige.

-President Branam of JarridiaCan you spare 4 divisions of Infantry, 5 divisions of tanks for the attack on Beirut?

You will have a PM to coordinate the movement of these forces in a moment.
Whittier
30-03-2004, 04:22
Whiittier,

Jarridia fully supports your claims and attacks against Al Anbar. We are prepared to stand by your side and help as necessary as we have talked before. If you need anything: Infantry, Tanks, Air Craft, etc. We would be happy to ablige.

-President Branam of JarridiaCan you spare 4 divisions of Infantry, 5 divisions of tanks for the attack on Beirut?

You will have a PM to coordinate the movement of these forces in a moment.