NationStates Jolt Archive


New aircraft from moozimoo UPDATED!!!

Moozimoo
26-03-2004, 08:29
yes i know - only 2 planes -

F/A-63 Lynx

http://www.bateshome.com/jordan/fa63.jpg

stats:Primary Function: Multi-role attack and fighter aircraft
Crew: 1
Powerplant
* One F404-GE-402 enhanced performance turbofan engines (17,700 pounds (8,027 kg) static thrust each)
Dimensions
Length: 56 feet (16.8 meters)
Wingspan: 40 feet 5 inches (13.5 meters)
Height: 15 feet 4 inches (4.6 meters)
Weights
Empty: 23,050 lb (10455 kg)
Maximum Takeoff: 51,900 pounds (23,537 kg)
Performance
Speed: Mach 1.9+
Ceiling: 65,000+ feet
Range: Combat: 1.089 nautical miles (1252.4 miles/2003 km), clean plus two AIM-9s
Ferry: 1,546 nautical miles (1,777.9 miles/2844 km), two AIM-9s plus three 330 gallon tanks retained
Armament
* One M61A1/A2 Vulcan 20mm cannon; AIM 9 Sidewinder, AIM 7 Sparrow, AIM-120 AMRAAM, Harpoon, Harm, SLAM, SLAM-ER, Maverick missiles; Joint Stand-Off Weapon (JSOW); Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM); various general purpose bombs, mines and rockets

Cost : 21 million USD each (thats about the same price as a Hornet)

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––--------------------
RS-33 Ocelot

http://www.bateshome.com/jordan/rs-33.jpg

This strange aircraft is designed to be a reconnaisence/strike bomber. It has a very high ceiling and only carries three bombs. These could be nuclear devices.

stats:
4 pratt&whitney airliner engines (777)
top speed: mach 2
Length:9.5 meters
Wingspan:33.5 meters
Height: 4.5 meters
cost: 20 million USD
Moozimoo
26-03-2004, 18:15
bump
Moozimoo
26-03-2004, 18:22
bump
Moozimoo
27-03-2004, 10:04
bump
Transnapastain
27-03-2004, 10:07
I see you put a lot of work into that, very nicely done!

If they are for sale, we would like to purchase 1 of each for research purposes and then to go on display in our Museum of Foreign Militaries


money wired upon confirmation
Chellis
27-03-2004, 10:11
1st one has a horrible wing design, at mach 1.9 those wings would take way too much stress to sustain flight.

Second one has lots wrong... Those engines are either way too big or the cockpit way to small. You dont really have any flaps or a tail either, so how do you expect to turn? like a tank? still doesnt get you up/down.
Moozimoo
27-03-2004, 19:33
ok, orders confirmed

Chellis: this is a fictional game right? therefore the aircraft are fictional. and don't have to stand up to the laws of physics. I do not have a wind tunnel facility at my house. as soon as one is constructed i will build some scale models and report back the findings to you :x .
AfrikaZkorps
27-03-2004, 19:41
Hmm I look into theese later........
The Zoogie People
27-03-2004, 19:41
Ah....never mind. I remember now.

From here. (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=133775&highlight=)
Neo-Soviet Russia
27-03-2004, 20:03
Zoogie, Moozimoo designed the plane as far as I know. If you've seen it in my storefront it's because him and I worked out a deal and with that, I offer it as well.
The Zoogie People
27-03-2004, 20:15
Zoogiedom is interested and will take 80 for evaluation purposes on our carriers...$1.6 billion, I believe?
Shildonia
27-03-2004, 21:32
1st one has a horrible wing design, at mach 1.9 those wings would take way too much stress to sustain flight.


N (http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/x-29.htm)o (http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/su-47.htm)
Chellis
27-03-2004, 23:13
Dude, you have to follow the laws of physics... Breaking them is godmoding... Should my soldiers be able to disperse their molecules and re-integrate them at will, so they are basically invincible?

THe Su-47 has a different type. The F/a 63 has Stuka-like wings, it seems like, from the pic.
Brandoniats
27-03-2004, 23:23
OOC: I could see those engines as being very high bypass turbofans, and there is a solar aircraft out there with very similiar wings. Though I do have a suggestion. Make it a 4 engined, with each engine roughly 1/4 diameter of the diameter of what the original engine is.
Moozimoo
28-03-2004, 08:25
Chellis: sorry, i didn't mean massive differences like teleportation, but the shape of a wing is a fairly small problem. What would you like me to alter that would make it airworthy? :wink:
You were right about the 2nd one though, i am goig to follow brandoniats' suggestions there.

Orders confirmed, zoogiedom. the price is correct if you mean the RS-33…
Moozimoo
28-03-2004, 19:42
bump
Moozimoo
29-03-2004, 07:35
done!
Chellis
29-03-2004, 07:39
The first one is fine if it is like the Su-47 wings, and not like a stuka setup. Second is very much fixed. However, I suggest you make both have fatter wings, by just a tiny bit. Nit-picking however.
Moozimoo
29-03-2004, 07:48
good good. raysia did the renderings, though…

now buy some!