NationStates Jolt Archive

Scalar electromagnetics is an extension of present electromagnetics (EM) to include gravitation.

That is, a unified electrogravitation, and, what is more important, it is a unified engineering theory. Its basis was discovered by Nikola Tesla.

The "electrical charge" of a charged particle-- such as one of the charged particles of an atom or one of the protons of its nucleus- represents a difference in flux intensity (potential) between the local particle and its ambient vacuum. Its the continual bleed-off of gravitational charge as electrical charge. If that bleed off is reversed or stopped, a drastic effect on the gravitational charge ensues. The 5-potential and the 5-charge have become 4-G-potential and 4-d-charge respectively.

Thus "charging" an object with its scalar EM pattern charges it gravitationally. Now the only "bleed off channel" is through the 4-G force field.

Further, in a nucleus the nucleons continually back and forth between proton and neutron, so the electrical charge is "spread" throughout the nucleus and shared by all the nucleons.

Further, each element (actually each isotope) has its own unique "ensemble pattern" of Fourier expansion scalar frequencies, amplitudes, etc.

This pattern can, of course, be reproduced artificially and transmitted by modified EM transmitters). There is, however, a sort of "master key" scalar EM (EG) pattern for nucleons (protons and neutrons which are changing back and forth into each other by exchange of virtual charge currents).

If one reverses the charge by inverting this pattern, and then "charges up a mass with the inverted charge," to the external observer the charging mass just gets lighter and lighter, and its inertia gets less and less.
Eventually it seems (to him) to acquire negative mass and negative inertia, and just accelerate away from the earth. the object falls upward instead of falling downwards.

There are also some weird time effects; that object can be moving slower through time than the laboratory observer, or even be moving backwards through time in respect to the laboratory observer.
(Don't believe everything they taught you in relativity; Most of what they teach has already experimentally proven to be in error.)

This is the concept for a scalar EG detector for a scalar EG waves. This is the Bendini scalar wave detector, adapted from an original concept by Dea and Faretto.

The idea is quite simple: install a very powerful bar magnet inside a grounded Faraday cage. Then install an open-ended coil longitudally above the magnet so that a line through the longitudal axis of the magnet passes through the longitudal axis of the coil above it. The open end of the coil does not touch the magnet.

Connect the other end of the coil to a variable tuning capacitor, so that the coil and the capacitor form a tunable, series-L-C-oscillatory circuit.
The output of the capacitor is connected to a transistorized preamplifier inside the cage. A tuning shaft for the capacitor is very carefully placed through a small hole in the shield to allow tuning from outside.

The output of the preamp passes through a small hole in the shield, through a shielded cable, to an adjacent oscilloscope. The cable shield is also grounded t a reference ground potential.

The theory is as follows: Suppose a normal EM wave appears inside the cage, above the magnet or closely adjacent thereto, in that case a coupled oscillation appears in the field of the magnet, and this oscillation is coupled to the coil immediately above it.

If the oscillation is within the bandwidth of the tuned series LC circuit, detection occurs, this is amplified by the preamp and passed to the oscilloscope, where it is displayed on the scope.

Note that the detector detects normal EM wave. Now our problem is:
How do we get an EG wave to be detected? And how do we assure that we do not detect ordinary EM waves from the outside? Actually this is simple. Ordinary waves (except for quite low frequency) will be grounded out by the Faraday shield, and will not penetrate the cage.

Thus these normal EM waves cannot enter the cage and appear above the magnet, they will not be detected. Scalar EG waves, on the other hand, will enter the cage since they do not couple to conduction electrons in the metal of the cage.

Above the pole of the magnet, spacetime is locally bent, after all, a pole is a magnetostatic scalar potential, which is a part of the conglomerate called "G-potential."

The pole represents an increase (or decrease, depending on whether it is a north or a south pole) in the magnetostatic component of the local G-potential.

This is a curvature of spacetime. An EG wave entering this region adds a varying component component of magnetostatic G-potential, which bleeds off in the coil as an ordinary EM wave.

Another way to view the detector is to model the EG wave as a longitudal wave, and an ordinary EM wave as a transverse wave. When the EG wave enters the curved spacetime region above the magnet, to the coil (the "observer" in this case) the longitudal aspect of the EG wave appears to be rotating back and forth, so that an oscillating transverse component is present.

This transverse component appears to the coil as an ordinary EM field, and so the LC circuit detects it if it is in the proper frequency band.

Yet another way to view the situation is to realize that an EG wave entering the magnet results in an oscillating component added to the magnetostatic scalar potential (pole strength) of the magnet.

Accordingly, the magnet is a receiver for scalar waves, which are detected to "bleed-off" as an oscillation of the magnetic field strength of the magnet.

Coupling of this oscillating magnetic field to the coil creates an oscillating current flow into the capacitor, this oscillates the voltage input to the preamp, which amplifies and feeds the signal to the oscilloscope for display.

It is important to remember that a magnetostatic potential and an electrostatic potential can be oscillated by a scalar EG wave. By placing a magnetic material inside a Faraday cage, the oscillation of the magnetostatic scalar potential (pole strength of the magnet) can be used as the EG detecting mechanism.

By placing a chargeable material inside a Faraday cage, the oscillation of the electrostatic scalar potential can be detected.

Note also that one may detect waves at one reference level and not at another. Changing the bias on the zero-reference ground of the Bendini detector affects the detection.

To look inside a normal EM carrier (such as the Soviet Woodpecker carrier) and see what scalar signals are riding upon it, the carrier may be used to bias the reference ground of the Bendini detector.

To produce a spectrum analyzer, simply use additional series resonant LC tuning circuits in parallel (put multiple taps on the coil, and wire each tap to a separate tuning capacitor of different capacitance).

Again, varying the zero reference level is important, as is varying the strength of the magnet. Dr. Sergei Valkov has also invented an excellent series of scalar wave detectors based on quite different proprietary principles.

The bottom line is: we can indeed rigorously detect and measure scalar EG waves, when one considers the large sums of money presently being spent to bury large aluminum cylinders etc. in an attempt to detect gravitational waves, one wonders why some funds could not be released to a few unorthodox researchers by the Valkonezh Research Complex to fund the proven creation and detection of electrogravitational waves...

Here is explained a new kind of resonance: scalar EM resonance, or electrogravitational resonance.

First, imagine we have a standard resonant cavity, in this cavity we have a resonant EM wave moving back and forth, in accordance with convention, the E-field vector and the B-field vector are at right angles in this moving wave front.

As the wave moves back and forth, the vectors vary back and forth; however, at any one point between the walls, the two vectors always have the same value.

Thus our resonant EM wave forms a standing wave in the cavity.

Now imagine that a second wave front, precisely like the first and of the same frequency, is superposed over the first one and travels with it. This second wave -- the "antiwave" -- has its force vectors 180 degrees out of phase with the force vectors of the reference wave. Hence the E-fields and B-fields of the two superposed waves always sum to vector zeros, anywhere in the cavity. To an external observer, the cavity contains no ordinary electromagnetic force fields, hence no ordinary EM energy.

However the energy density of a single EM sine wave in vacuum is given by:

density 2 [ E + B ]/8 pi

This energy density is always positive, hence the energy density of the two waves at any point X between the walls is equal to:

2 2 [ E + B ]/4 pi

where

E=E(x) ; B=B(x)

Thus the energy density of vacuum varies with X, but, rigorously, since the resultant E and B fields are zero, this describes a standing gravitational wave.

Hence we have a standing EG wave existing in the cavity, this is an example of scalar resonance. Rigorously the cavity has mass and inertia, to an outside observer, as a result of the two warps in spacetime it contains.

Note that in one half cycle the energy density of vacuum is greater than ambient, and in the other half cycle it is less, in the region of one half cycle, time flows at a faster rate than to the ambient observer, and in the other half cycle time flows at a slower rate than to the ambient observer.
One half cycle appears to contain negative electrical charge, and the other appears to contain positive charge.

One half cycle appears to contain a north pole (positive magnetostatic scalar potential), and the other half cycle appears to contain a south pole (negative magnetostatic scalar potential).

Perhaps now one can begin to understand why a continuously accelerated orbital electron in the atom does not radiate EM energy, completely in violation of Maxwell's equations, the electron is naught but a complex aspect

Scalar resonance is a particular zero summed multi-resonance, electromagnetically, so that it does not act in an electromagnetic manner.

A scalar resonance is a standing electromagnetic wave, it can be made electrically, but is not electrical in behavior.

In any scalar resonance, spacetime is curved, and it is the magnitude (and direction) of this spacetime curvature that is oscillating in "standing wave" fashion.

In respect to stress of the vacuum medium, one half of a standing sine wave of scalar resonance is tensile; the other half is compressive.
However, this is with respect to the local ambient stress of the vacuum.

"Mass" of a particle is just a characteristic exhibited by a trapped scalar resonance, usually this trapping is done by the "spin" of theindividual particle.

The concept of "mass" may be compared with the concept of "capacitance." That is, a mass is an accumulator for scalar waves; that is, for scalar resonances.

It is continually being "charged" and "discharged" by absorption and emission of scalar waves from and to the ambient vacuum scalar wave flux.

Indeed the magnitude of a mass may be defined in terms of the absolute value of this "switching" (absorption = switch in; emission = switch out) rate.

In the normal linear spacetime, the "charging" and "discharging" are equal in all directions; so the mass exhibited in any direction is the same.

With respect to an "external observer's" equilibrium flux, a moving object encounters an increased amount of flux rate along its line of motion, just as a moving object in a rainstorm encounters more raindrops per second in the direction of its path, than does a stationary object.
Encountering increased scalar wave flux (with respect to the external observer) forces the moving object to absorb and emit scalar waves at a higher rate along its direction of motion than when its not moving.
Thus to the external observer, the mass of the object has increased, insofar as any disturbing force along its line of motion is concerned.

At right angles to its line of motion however, the flux rate is precisely the same as when the object is at rest, therefore the "mass" of the moving object with respect to any disturbing force at right angles to its line of motion has not changed, as seen by the external observer.

Thus is explained both parts of one of the all time great mysteries of special relativity: (1) how the mass of an object increases with respect to its motion, and (2) why the mass only increases with respect to its line of motion, and not at any right angles to it.

The inertia of a particle is due to its mass, i.e., to the total magnitude of its trapped scalar resonance.

The gravitational attraction between two masses is due to their spacetime curvature, further, mass is like a capacitance, it can trap additional scalar waves as trapped resonance; hence increase its magnitude or "inertial charge", or, it can discharge more scalar waves than it absorbs;
hence decrease its magnitude or "internal charge"...

Those scalar waves emitted from resonance are emitted as a pattern ensemble of the resonance, hence they may be regarded as constituting a current of scalar resonance leaving the mass accumulator object.
Scalar waves absorbed into trapped resonance may be regarded as constituting a current of scalar resonance into the mass accumulator object, thus it is proper to speak of scalar resonance as being able to "flow".

Further, it is possible to increase the mass of an object directly, by transmitting scalar EM waves to it so that it absorbs them. (By absorbing scalar waves one means that more enter the object than leave it, so that the object acts as an internal accumulator charging up with internal charge.

This is done by ensuring the reference potential of the scalar wave transmitter is higher than the reference potential of the irradiated object.)

It is also possible to decrease the mass of an object directly, by transmitting scalar EM waves to it so that it emits more than it absorbs. (By emitting scalar waves one means that more leave the object than enter it, so the object acts as if it were an internal accumulator that is discharging its internal charge. this is done by insuring that the reference potential of the scalar transmitter is lower than the reference potential of the irradiated object.)

As can be seen, the scalar wave "transmitter" is actually somewhat comparable to a heat pump; it can either act as an "energy transmitter" or as an "energy extractor", depending on the difference in potential between "transmitter" and "receiver."

Scalar resonance can have a specific pattern: both in frequency and in spatial curvature aspects, as well as "rate of flow of time" aspects. Indeed, scalar-wise every object has its individual "scalar pattern" which is a unique fingerprint, since that print is spatiotemporal, it is a product of that objects entire past history.
Thus --scalar wise-- no two objects are identical.

This brings up another rather amazing potential: If a reasonably precise scalar pattern of an object can be "irradiated" and resonated with scalar waves, energy may be created in or extracted from the distant object, just as stimulating one tuning fork can excite another at a distance by sympathetic resonance.
I leave it to you to ascertain the relavence of this statement to clairvoyance, radionics, remote viewing, etc.

For the skeptic, however, we must point out that --rigorously-- quantum mechanics requires that, continually, in any localized region of spacetime, the "pattern" of any object in the universe appears momentarily in the virtual state, purely from statistical considerations alone.

So long as the situation remains statistical, any place in the universe can continue to have the "ghosts" of everything present there, in an ethereally thin pattern, and the observable world will not be affected by it.

However if one can discriminate and scalarly "charge" or "discharge" individual patterns in this "ghost-realm", action at a distance is directly possible, as is materialization and dematerialization.

If one accepts that even thought itself produces such virtual "ghost-patterns" in the virtual particle flux of vacuum, then it is at least theoretically possible to materialize thoughts and thought images.

We have entered a new kind of reality where the old rules and the old limitations do not necessarily apply.

As pointed out, we can greatly simplify matters by considering 'currents of scalar resonance' these currents flow from higher potential to lower potential, regardless of whether we are considering "transmission" or "reception".

Indeed, to transmit at lower potential is to receive, and to receive at higher potential is to transmit.

Thus the "transmitter-receiver" is a special system where simply biasing two nodes differently determines which way the scalar resonance will flow.

We may increase or decrease an object's inertia and mass, simply by properly biasing the transmitter-receiver's two nodes.

If we interfere two transmitters in a region of great energy--such as the molten core of the earth itself--and bias the transmitters negatively, we can extract enormous energy directly from that distant source.

Thus, we reach as to how this new powerplant works. While not extracting energy from the earth's core (as it might prove dangerous), our researchers are planning to concieve a powerplant that will extract vast amounts of energy from radioactive materials directly. It will not only provide immesurable amounts of energy, but we will be rid of harmful radioactive wastes.

Before you get funding, it helps to actually have a theory. Can you write down the field equations of this theory, or are you just throwing around technical terms in an attempt to scam people?

OOC:
As far as I can tell, some field equations are in the middle of the double post. I don't have much experience in the field, you can not expect me to prove it mathematically. (At least, not completely) Scalar Electromagnetics isn't written in any textbook, as it is unorthodox to Western theorems, the only mention I have found is in websites that aren't normally enlisted on search engines and rumours of Soviet Union Scalar Electromagnetic weaponry being used against the United States of America during the Cold war.

Look, I'm trying as hard as I can to prove this against godmodding, but that doesn't mean that I shouldn't fail short of making it an abstract worthy of real life mention.

OOC:
Bump.

OOC:
As far as I can tell, some field equations are in the middle of the double post.

The only equation I see is the equation from ordinary classical physics for the energy density of the electromagnetic field.

I don't have much experience in the field, you can not expect me to prove it mathematically. (At least, not completely)

No one has asked for a proof of any sort yet, just a complete description of the theory, which will obviously involve some mathematics.

Scalar Electromagnetics isn't written in any textbook, as it is unorthodox to Western theorems,

I assume you mean "theories," unless you're claiming that mathematics somehow does not apply to this theory.

the only mention I have found is in websites that aren't normally enlisted on search engines

OOC: Oh, goody, the Internet! You can find all sorts of things on the Internet. Out of curiosity, how many of these sites are listed on http://www.crank.net/?

and rumours of Soviet Union Scalar Electromagnetic weaponry being used against the United States of America during the Cold war.

OOC: See? Even RL nations are prone to godmodding. As I recall, they also were looking into killer psychics to assassinate people at a distance. And America made a big deal about a "Star Wars" system to shoot down nuclear missiles we were nowhere close to developing. Only downside of godmodding is that it can only have a psychological effect.

IC: Until there is some sort of substantiation, we believe the recent claims of Zvarinograd to be propaganda, intended only to frighten its potential enemies.

OOC:
As far as I can tell, some field equations are in the middle of the double post.

The only equation I see is the equation from ordinary classical physics for the energy density of the electromagnetic field.

I don't have much experience in the field, you can not expect me to prove it mathematically. (At least, not completely)

No one has asked for a proof of any sort yet, just a complete description of the theory, which will obviously involve some mathematics.

Scalar Electromagnetics isn't written in any textbook, as it is unorthodox to Western theorems,

I assume you mean "theories," unless you're claiming that mathematics somehow does not apply to this theory.

the only mention I have found is in websites that aren't normally enlisted on search engines

OOC: Oh, goody, the Internet! You can find all sorts of things on the Internet. Out of curiosity, how many of these sites are listed on http://www.crank.net/?

and rumours of Soviet Union Scalar Electromagnetic weaponry being used against the United States of America during the Cold war.

OOC: See? Even RL nations are prone to godmodding. As I recall, they also were looking into killer psychics to assassinate people at a distance. And America made a big deal about a "Star Wars" system to shoot down nuclear missiles we were nowhere close to developing. Only downside of godmodding is that it can only have a psychological effect.

IC: Until there is some sort of substantiation, we believe the recent claims of Zvarinograd to be propaganda, intended only to frighten its potential enemies.

I assume you mean "theories," unless you're claiming that mathematics somehow does not apply to this theory.

OOC:
You assumed correctly, the latter need not to be mentioned.

OOC: Oh, goody, the Internet! You can find all sorts of things on the Internet. Out of curiosity, how many of these sites are listed on http://www.crank.net/?

OOC:
None, found them elsewhere.

OOC: See? Even RL nations are prone to godmodding. As I recall, they also were looking into killer psychics to assassinate people at a distance. And America made a big deal about a "Star Wars" system to shoot down nuclear missiles we were nowhere close to developing. Only downside of godmodding is that it can only have a psychological effect.

OOC:
I only used these rumors in interest. It inspired me to find some basis in fact of the weaponry, not at all relevant to the theory itself.

IC:
Propaganda, on a powerplant? Pardon, but what are you talking about? This is not some sort of weapon, is it now?

Dr. Sergei Valkov
United Communist States of Zvarinograd

IC:
Propaganda, on a powerplant? Pardon, but what are you talking about? This is not some sort of weapon, is it now?

Dr. Sergei Valkov
United Communist States of Zvarinograd

The same energy that can power a city might also be used to destroy one. And sometimes power plants are used to make weapons in other ways; for example, many nuclear reactors produce plutonium as a side product. Nevertheless, it is good that you have not stated any intentions of building weapons based on this theory you say you are investigating.