NationStates Jolt Archive


War on Terrorism!

Swedish Dominions
15-01-2004, 16:00
The Führer of the Swedish Dominons


"A couple of weeks ago, our king Gustav III Adolf was killed when a suicide bomber attacked the Parliment. I ask the International Community to join us in a struggle to eliminate Terrorism. what i mean is that we should declare war against nations like the GLA terrorists."

Führer Johan Eriksson.
Aust
15-01-2004, 16:02
The Führer of the Swedish Dominons


"A couple of weeks ago, our king Gustav III Adolf was killed when a suicide bomber attacked the Parliment. I ask the International Community to join us in a struggle to eliminate Terrorism. what i mean is that we should declare war against nations like the GLA terrorists."

Führer Johan Eriksson.
Aust is fevrently Anti-terrorist I will help
Swedish Dominions
15-01-2004, 17:59
Bump
Credonia
15-01-2004, 18:06
GLA isnt a nation, its an international terror organization
Swedish Dominions
15-01-2004, 18:10
GLA isnt a nation, its an international terror organization

geeeez what ever!
15-01-2004, 19:27
Greetings from Xeraph!

We are currently conducting wargames with one of our new nations, Bandakar, a good place to make the following statement:

We are in the last stages of a war on terror (see "Tactical Strikes...Rogue Nation of Anti-American Semites"), and will join any and all nations who want to wipe terrorists from the map.

The Alliance Regioni Militaria is comprised of approx 55 nations, and is aligned with the NNA, AR, and IADF. We also have many supporters who aided us in the war.

We stand ready to form a Coalition to systematically eradicate all terrorist organizations, one at a time.

Anyone interested?

Respectfully,

Alaric, King of Xeraph, Ambssador to ARM, NNA,AR, IADF
Joshu
15-01-2004, 19:57
As much as I hate terrorism, I'm afraid that I'm not going to actively join this coalition against terror, and for one reason: it's pointless for me to do so. I'm not saying that a war on terror is pointless. It's just that all the nations of Ninjao have already declared a War on Error, and terrorism definitely falls under that category. So, it'd be tantamount to beating a dead horse. However, I do support this movement, and hope it succeeds.
15-01-2004, 20:18
The government of the Confederacy of Kelleysland wishes to have 'terrorism' defined before making a committment on this issue. As we all know, one man's 'terrorist' is another man's 'freedom fighter'.
Respectfully,
William Clarke Quantrill
Confederacy of Kelleysland UN Representative
15-01-2004, 21:40
You cannot wage a war on an abstract concept such as terrorism. Terrorism is not a thing, it is a subjective abstract concept. "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter." It is imposible to say who is a terrorist, and who is a freedom fighter, because one group will veiw it one way, and another group will veiw it another way. Plus, terrorism is a concept, not a physical thing, you can wage war on groups and nations, but not on concepts. Besides, a war on "terrorism" is one that cannot be won or ended. Everytime you kill one "terrorist" or eliminate one group, ten more take it's place. It will never end. You can pour as much as you like in to it, but it is futile, terrorism is forever, it will never go away.
16-01-2004, 02:24
I don't know why I'm adding this, but I think a terrorist is one who furthers his goals by targeting civilians/not speciffically military targets. Just my rather pointless input.
16-01-2004, 02:25
EDIT: Double post
16-01-2004, 02:40
A war on terrorism is hypocritical if you think about it. 1) If there were some way to determine who all the terrorists were, it would be somewhat easier. You could go and wipe them out. But then others would join see this and join the terrorist side, so you'd kill all of them. By the time its said and done you will have been the biggest terrorist of them all so you’d have to kill yourself and anyone who supported you (for supporting terrorism). To catch a wolf you have to be a wolf, but the question is which wolf is worse? Can you really justify it?

With all the garbage I just said I would still like to join the cause. My Name is Nazi Fox. An anti-fascist group.
F - fascism
O - On
X - Exile
My mission is to eliminate fascism nations. You can't change the world but you can make a dent. Sign me up Johnny.
16-01-2004, 02:41
A war on terrorism is hypocritical if you think about it. 1) If there were some way to determine who all the terrorists were, it would be somewhat easier. You could go and wipe them out. But then others would join see this and join the terrorist side, so you'd kill all of them. By the time its said and done you will have been the biggest terrorist of them all so you’d have to kill yourself and anyone who supported you (for supporting terrorism). To catch a wolf you have to be a wolf, but the question is which wolf is worse? Can you really justify it?

With all the garbage I just said I would still like to join the cause. My Name is Nazi Fox. An anti-fascist group.
F - fascism
O - On
X - Exile
My mission is to eliminate fascism nations. You can't change the world but you can make a dent. Sign me up Johnny.
16-01-2004, 02:41
A war on terrorism is hypocritical if you think about it. 1) If there were some way to determine who all the terrorists were, it would be somewhat easier. You could go and wipe them out. But then others would join see this and join the terrorist side, so you'd kill all of them. By the time its said and done you will have been the biggest terrorist of them all so you’d have to kill yourself and anyone who supported you (for supporting terrorism). To catch a wolf you have to be a wolf, but the question is which wolf is worse? Can you really justify it?

With all the garbage I just said I would still like to join the cause. My Name is Nazi Fox. An anti-fascist group.
F - fascism
O - On
X - Exile
My mission is to eliminate fascism nations. You can't change the world but you can make a dent. Sign me up Johnny.