NationStates Jolt Archive


Big Name Joint Development

Unum Veritas
31-12-2003, 03:36
The Imperial Republic of Unum Veritas, after running a highly successful naval storefront for some time, wishes to now expand its role in the international arms trade by involving itself in joint efforts with other nations of similar or better credentials. The government is looking for nations that also run storefronts which have been operational for at least 2 months and have consistently shown quality products as well as profits. We also would prefer nations we have not interacted with much to apply in order to increase our relations in the international community. Most of the projects we are interested in are related to naval warfare and primarily consist of Western, modern technology. Any nations interested should post in this thread and the details can be worked out.

Pending Projects:
Naval Air Superiority Fighter Jet (Crookfur and UV)
Naval Fighter Bomber (Kazakhstania/Freedom Country and UV)
Small, "pocket" aircraft carrier (UV and DT and Crookfur)
Supercarrier (Crookfur and UV and Kazakhstania/Freedom Country)
Destroyer
Attack Submarine (UV and Autonomous City-States)

http://sc.groups.msn.com/tn/32/92/captainjacksparrow/4/34.jpg
High Chancellor Sparrow
The Imperial Republic of Unum Veritas
Member: NAIA (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1667209#1667209)
Member: Band of Brothers (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2432224#2432224)
Owner: Unum Veritas Naval Store (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=655745#655745)
31-12-2003, 04:02
Naval Air Superiority Fighter Jet [Got it]
Naval Fighter Bomber [Got it]
Small, "pocket" aircraft carrier [Got it]
Supercarrier [Workin on it]
Destroyer [Not working on it]
Attack Submarine [Not working on it]

http://www.bateshome.com/jordan/rsig1.jpg (http://www.bateshome.com/jordan/rmtdex.htm)
Unum Veritas
31-12-2003, 19:09
I meant develop new ones, together... :?
Unum Veritas
31-12-2003, 19:09
I already have forms all of these as well, but I've been in the mood for developing new ones and I figured I'd get some help this time.
The Zoogie People
31-12-2003, 19:14
I'll try to help for the two aircraft, and perhaps the other projects as well although I'm not that experienced with ships. I have some plans for an air superiority naval fighter, but much of the specifications I don't know...
31-12-2003, 19:22
Id go for the pocket carrier, as I have the rest...
Unum Veritas
31-12-2003, 19:23
DT, you want to work together to design one? I currently don't offer any small carriers (tend to rely more heavily on brute force) but I think there could be a niche for them.
Autonomous City-states
31-12-2003, 19:37
Federation naval engineers have long prided themselves on being world-class developers of combat submarine designs. We would be interested in developing a new attack submarine with your engineers.
Unum Veritas
31-12-2003, 19:47
We would be more than pleased to work with you on a new attack submarine. Details could be worked out here, in a separate thread, or through telegrams; whichever is most convenient for you.
Autonomous City-states
31-12-2003, 19:50
Why don't we start a separate thread for that? It'll help differentiate between designs, yet still allow for sanity checks from well-informed players in other countries. If you could get it going with a general list of capabilities you are looking for, that would be a great starting place.
Unum Veritas
31-12-2003, 19:54
Very well, although be forewarned: submarines are not quite my strongpoint. The name of the thread will be "Joint Attack Sub, ATTN: ACS" and it'll be up in just a few minutes.
Crookfur
31-12-2003, 20:59
Hmmm well i would be interested in the pocket carrier (mainly as i'm working on a small one of my own and some outside imput would be useful), the super carrier (mainly i think its about time that Crookfur had a at least semi indiginous one to replace our rahter odd mix of second hand nimitz's, russian ones bought from DT when i first started (not that they retain much of the original features) and some i bought of FC (no offence to freedom country and at least UE had sort of helped with them i think)) and perhaps the airsuperiority fighter.
31-12-2003, 21:03
DT, you want to work together to design one? I currently don't offer any small carriers (tend to rely more heavily on brute force) but I think there could be a niche for them.
Sure, I have a nimitz size carrier, but nothing smaller.
31-12-2003, 21:04
We'd be interested in the small "pocket" carriers... If there is anything we can do to help with the development of it, please telegram my nation.
31-12-2003, 21:05
I have no storefront but lots of resourses
Unum Veritas
31-12-2003, 21:50
Hmmm well i would be interested in the pocket carrier (mainly as i'm working on a small one of my own and some outside imput would be useful), the super carrier (mainly i think its about time that Crookfur had a at least semi indiginous one to replace our rahter odd mix of second hand nimitz's, russian ones bought from DT when i first started (not that they retain much of the original features) and some i bought of FC (no offence to freedom country and at least UE had sort of helped with them i think)) and perhaps the airsuperiority fighter.

Okay Crookfur, would you like to help on all three or just focus on one?
Crookfur
31-12-2003, 23:00
All 3 if you need me to but if you want to wait and see where i might be needed most that would be cool too.
Unum Veritas
01-01-2004, 17:08
Well its entirely up to you. Is there any single area where you have more knowledge than the others? Any one you like better than the others? It really doesn't matter to me, all that much, so please choose whichever you wish.
Unum Veritas
01-01-2004, 23:32
BUMP
The Zoogie People
01-01-2004, 23:34
Can I still develop the naval air superiority and fighter-bomber?
Unum Veritas
01-01-2004, 23:41
Do you meet all of the requirements? (see first post)
The Zoogie People
01-01-2004, 23:43
Ah...I haven't interacted too much but my only storefront is new.
Unum Veritas
01-01-2004, 23:46
Darn. Well, perhaps we can interact in some other way, as in war games or a diplomatic RP.
Crookfur
02-01-2004, 12:48
I think that Crookfur will sign up for all 3. To be honest i have a fairly general work grasp of most bits and bobs.

Perhaps a contract with stiff penalties for withdrawing may be useful to stop me backing out if things get complicated ;)
Unum Veritas
02-01-2004, 16:21
LoL. I'm not sure what kind of penalties you mean, but I'll go ahead and add you to the main list. We can open a new thread for the actual development (to keep things from getting too cluttered). So be thinking of what kind of specs you'd like to see on the three. Also, it will be me, you, and Dark Terror working on the pocket carrier, is that alright?
Crookfur
03-01-2004, 02:32
Sounds good to me.

I really ment financial penalties (basically i've been reading a supplement about the eurofighter project where those involved would have to pay the others sums costing more than thier actual aircraft purchases if they withdrew).
Kazakhstania
03-01-2004, 21:19
Ok. Time to reveal...THE TRUTH.

Right, here we go....

*Drumroll*

I am....FREEDOM COUNTRY. DUH DUH DUUUUUUUUUUH.

Ok. Right. Enter me and him in both the supercarrier and Naval Fighter Bomber, ok.
Unum Veritas
03-01-2004, 22:34
Kazakhstania, alright, we'll work on the super carrier and fighter bomber. I believe that closes all the projects out.

Crookfur, would you like to set up a separate thread or should I for the other three?
Unum Veritas
03-01-2004, 22:35
Wait, destroyer is still open.
Crookfur
03-01-2004, 23:36
If you would be so kind as to do all three, i'm kind of vague as to my exact requirements at the mo.
Unum Veritas
04-01-2004, 17:03
Alright, I'll set them up at some point today.
Unum Veritas
04-01-2004, 17:18
Crookfur, here is the air-superiority fighter design thread:

http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2526424#2526424