CC-100 Echo Class Assault Carriers For Export
Credonia
25-12-2003, 00:28
Sales Policy: This weapon will not be sold to any nation under the age of 3 weeks old
Credonia releases its newest Aircraft Carrier. This carrier is the fastest, longest, and most powerful carrier ever to be put to sea.
http://www.pennswoods.net/~mcgarvey/harrystruman.jpg
Specifications
Power Plant: Eight nuclear reactors, four shafts
Length: overall 1,101 feet 2 inches (335.64 meters)
Flight Deck Width: 252 feet (75.6 meters)
Beam: 133 feet (39.9 meters)
Displacement: 89,600 tons (80,640 metric tons) full load
Speed: 30+ knots (34.5 miles per hour)
Aircraft: 85 (Can support F-14A Tomcats, Harriers, and Attack or Transport helicopters)
Crew Ship's Company: 3,350 - Air Wing 2,480
Armament
Sea Sparrow missiles
3 Phalanx CIWS
20mm mounts
Combat Systems
SPS-48C/E
SPS-49
SPS-67
3 Mk91
Fire Control
SLQ-29 EW
WLR- 1 ESM
WLR-11 ESM
Price: $5.5 Billion Aircraft sold separatly.
See the Credonian Aircraft Storefront (http://www.geocities.com/credonia) to choose aircraft and helicopters and get the prices.
Credonia
25-12-2003, 00:56
BUMP
Of the council of clan
25-12-2003, 01:26
11 Billion is rather pricey for a Nimitz class Carrier.
Of the council of clan
25-12-2003, 01:26
11 Billion is rather pricey for a Nimitz class Carrier.
Seversky
25-12-2003, 01:48
F-16C's cannot opperate from carriers.
Credonia
25-12-2003, 17:31
BUMP
Credonia
25-12-2003, 17:31
who said it was based on the Nimitz (and it isnt)
I'll take two of them. I'll provide my own aircraft. Thats 11 billion. Money wired.
Credonia
25-12-2003, 19:25
order confirmed
Credonia
25-12-2003, 21:38
BUMP
Of the council of clan
26-12-2003, 06:14
who said it was based on the Nimitz (and it isnt)
It's either a Nimitz or Enterprise.
Hahaha, you call that the best? Sea Sparrows are old and worthless, so is Phalanx CIWS!
This...is...a lousy ship.
Credonia
26-12-2003, 09:29
ACTUALLY, its the best in the American navy, so if your callig american carriers lousy, then u obviously dont know your carriers very well
Credonia
26-12-2003, 15:06
BUMP
Soviet Haaregrad
26-12-2003, 15:54
OOC:
This isn't the largest carrier, my big carriers are 5m longer. :P
Though bigger than the Kitty Hawk it just makes it a bigger target for your ship is 36ft. longer and holds the same amount of aircraft.
Do they count as longer if they have Massive Protrudences of Barnacles?
Arribastan
26-12-2003, 16:03
We would by this if our nimitzes weren't used for Escort carriers.
Soviet Haaregrad
26-12-2003, 16:08
Though bigger than the Kitty Hawk it just makes it a bigger target for your ship is 36ft. longer and holds the same amount of aircraft.
Stick some armour on it. *hugs his 16" belt armour on his carriers*
I will purchase one of the carriers. On a side note, do F-22's work from carriers?
Arribastan
26-12-2003, 16:11
I will purchase one of the carriers. On a side note, do F-22's work from carriers?nope. to fragile.
but sea raptors do.
Credonia
26-12-2003, 16:14
I will purchase one of the carriers. On a side note, do F-22's work from carriers?
Yes, thres a carrier based version. Im not sure, but it uses thrust vectoring for take off, its more efficient.
Your order will be confirmed on wiring of payment
Credonia
26-12-2003, 16:16
I will purchase one of the carriers. On a side note, do F-22's work from carriers?nope. to fragile.
but sea raptors do.
They do, they were talking about next generation aircraft on the Discovery Wings channel, and i happened to tape it, and they're developing a carrier based version, so basically yes they do ;)
Soviet Haaregrad
26-12-2003, 16:16
I will purchase one of the carriers. On a side note, do F-22's work from carriers?
No.
F/A-18
F-14
F-4(some versions)
A-4
A-6
A-7(some versions)
F-8
MiG 29K
Su 33(Su 27K)
MiG 23/27K
Su 25K
Rafale
F-35C JSF
Those are the only RL carrier aircraft that might be of some use.
[edit]
Gasp! They've decided to not develop the ATF-N?
Arribastan
26-12-2003, 16:17
I think there's an Su-37K.
Soviet Haaregrad
26-12-2003, 16:20
I think there's an Su-37K.
I'm pretty sure you mean the Su 33, or a Su 33 upgraded to match a Su 37(Su 33M?).
Arribastan
26-12-2003, 16:22
I think there's an Su-37K.
I'm pretty sure you mean the Su 33, or a Su 33 upgraded to match a Su 37(Su 33M?).eh. maybe not...
Soviet Haaregrad
26-12-2003, 16:24
I think there's an Su-37K.
I'm pretty sure you mean the Su 33, or a Su 33 upgraded to match a Su 37(Su 33M?).eh. maybe not...
They all look the same, like a Flanker with foreplanes and vectored thrust.(Su 33, 35, 37 I mean)
The flanker with foreplanes is the 33-D model isn't it? specially designed for carrier operations off the Kuznetsov carriers.
I will purchase one of the carriers. On a side note, do F-22's work from carriers?
No.
F/A-18
F-14
F-4(some versions)
A-4
A-6
A-7(some versions)
F-8
MiG 29K
Su 33(Su 27K)
MiG 23/27K
Su 25K
Rafale
F-35C JSF
Those are the only RL carrier aircraft that might be of some use.
[edit]
Gasp! They've decided to not develop the ATF-N?
You forgot Su-34.
ACTUALLY, its the best in the American navy, so if your callig american carriers lousy, then u obviously dont know your carriers very well
Yeah, I am. Only because my carriers are better, and the technology on your carrier is outdated...way outdated even for RL carriers. Not to mention the fact that your aircraft capacity doesn't match what you can actually handle considering length....and the fact that you have quite a lousy selection of modern radar systems.
I know my carriers, and you should learn how to type :)
Credonia
26-12-2003, 18:02
i do know how to type (obviously, otherwise i wouldnt be typin now, now would i :-P) and your the one who doesnt know their carriers. Its based from the Enterprise, NOT THE NIMITZ ;-) Check the stats on www.globalsecurity.org where i got the info, it woul dbe hard to believe that your right and they're wrong.
ACTUALLY, its the best in the American navy, so if your callig american carriers lousy, then u obviously dont know your carriers very well
An OOC Fact: The American Nimitz is based on the Forrestal, which is actually a 50+ years old platform. The CVN-77 however, is still based on the Nimitz while the CVX-78 will feature a new, stealthy design.
Anyways, you could put some Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM) launchers on the ship. For the Phalanxes however, I seriously suggest to ditch it, and go with the better Oerlikon Millenium Gun (35mm cannon which is much more sensitive and powerful, and have better penetration capabilities to destroy Russian missiles such as the Sunburn or Yakhont, which has armor).
Other than that, I would say it is pertty realisticly designed :D
Also a note regarding Soviet Haaregrad's carrier aircraft list: while the Russian carrier aircraft DO have modification to be launched from carriers (naval navigation aid, shorter takeoff, arrestor hook, etc.) I don't really think that they can takeoff from a normal Nimitz. the Admiral Kuznetsov is sorta a CTOL carrier/aviation cruiser after all.
Credonia
27-12-2003, 02:41
order confirmed
Credonia
29-12-2003, 12:20
BUMP
Credonia
25-01-2004, 04:11
BUMP
The Zoogie People
25-01-2004, 04:15
There's no F-22 naval version. It's a shame, they should have ordered 750 F-22s from the beginning. Ah, the irony. It would cost more, but nobody would complain the per-unit cost of the F-22.
I'll buy two.
Credonia
25-01-2004, 04:17
Order confirmed and will be shipped on wiring of funds (State the amount)
The Zoogie People
25-01-2004, 04:36
[code:1:bd38e3a0b3]
Official Bank of Zoogie
--------------------------
Transaction:
Ab: The Zoogie People
Ad: Credonia
Amount: $11 billion
[/code:1:bd38e3a0b3]
Credonia
25-01-2004, 04:39
wire transfer confirmed, order shipped
Credonia
31-01-2004, 17:46
BUMP
Credonia
02-02-2004, 16:28
BUMP
Credonia
26-02-2004, 11:17
BUMP
Easy green
26-02-2004, 11:37
ill take one and if you can offer me a good complement of aircraft to ill buy them
Credonia
26-02-2004, 11:39
Sure, your looking at one of NS most reliable aircraft sellers.
you can buy aircraft here http://www.geocities.com/credonia
Easy green
26-02-2004, 14:40
well give me a short list of your best aircraft and their specs and ill have a look and maybe we can come to some sort of long term contract? thanks again.
Credonia
26-02-2004, 16:28
alright, give me a couple day, im actually working on a reference site for me listing all aircraft and military forces i have along with their specs and pics ;-)
imported_Illior
26-02-2004, 16:49
i'll take ten please... money will be automatically wired upon confirmation
Credonia
26-02-2004, 17:14
your a bit young to be able to support 1 carrier, let alone 10. come back when your population is about 100 mill
Easy green
27-02-2004, 11:55
alright, give me a couple day, im actually working on a reference site for me listing all aircraft and military forces i have along with their specs and pics ;-)
ok thanks mate look foward to hearin from you. send the info to me via telegram :D
Credonia
28-02-2004, 13:47
BUMP
Credonia
29-03-2004, 17:30
BUMP
Credonia
29-03-2004, 17:30
BUMP
Now Credonia, you can't honestly say that your carrier is the fastest, strongest and most powerful carrier to ever be put to sea, when your competition is.. well, me ;)
All in love
(Nice ship, by the way)
Aanmericaa
29-03-2004, 19:54
Our ASA imperial navy would like to order 6 of these great carriers. THe navy will be very pleased to introduce these fine carreirs into our ASA naval fleet. Money will be sent now.
*money wired*
Credonia
30-03-2004, 08:39
Our ASA imperial navy would like to order 6 of these great carriers. THe navy will be very pleased to introduce these fine carreirs into our ASA naval fleet. Money will be sent now.
*money wired*
I suppose you could barely support six carrier, in thta case, order confirmed and shipped
McLeod03
30-03-2004, 09:07
OOC:Its not as long, fast, or "powerful" as my Freedom class carriers.
Credonia
30-03-2004, 09:18
OOC:Its not as long, fast, or "powerful" as my Freedom class carriers.
I have some of your freedo class carriers, i bought some months ago
Credonia
06-04-2004, 09:58
BUMP
Credonia
15-05-2004, 18:53
BUMP