NationStates Jolt Archive


Geneva Convention In Nationstates ?

22-11-2003, 15:50
Should we have the Geneva convention in Nationstates ? Forbidding biological weapons and the like.
Mapalgetia
22-11-2003, 16:09
Wolfish's Convention only covers UN nations and POWs, so we need to broaden it. Any wishing to sign a GC-like document, please post here.

I do.
WesternAustralia
22-11-2003, 16:09
WA recommends that the nation of Biotopia be sought as an ideal place to arrange negotiations.

They are a member of both CACE and the Non-Human Union, organisations that promote improved living standards across NationStates and can be counted on to support such a convention.
Celttis
22-11-2003, 16:12
OOC: I'm in a big hurry in IRL, so i can't partisipate on planning or talks about GC. But my nation will sing it once it's ready. So you have my full support.
Mapalgetia
22-11-2003, 16:12
We second this recomendation.
Biotopia
22-11-2003, 17:03
awwww, Mr popular nation, right here folks... enough of that vomit inducing crape.

I must put out a puppet warning on WA. However i didn't have time to sign out, sign back in and sign out again while replying as WA in a seperate thread at the same time, of cause i'm sure WA would have endorsed us anyway, lol
22-11-2003, 17:09
Wolfish's Convention only covers UN nations and POWs, so we need to broaden it. Any wishing to sign a GC-like document, please post here.

I do. But nobody follows Wolfish's Convetion. I, a UN member, have tousands of bio weapons spilt up into fifteen projects.
Mapalgetia
22-11-2003, 17:12
Precisely my point.

So, here is the original Geneva Convention (post any revisions you wish to have for NS):

http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/History/Human_Rights/geneva1.html
Credonia
22-11-2003, 17:14
good idea gentlemen. Should a Geneva convention be held, Credonia will send representatives
Bayorta
22-11-2003, 17:20
Bayorta would willingly sign any Geneva convention type document(if of course we agree with the terms) and will be sending a substantial amount of representatives if this goes ahead.

Regards,
Margaret Thatcher,
Foreign secretary,
Ministry of Foreign affairs

http://www.ild.org.pe/images/nutshell/thatcher.jpg
22-11-2003, 17:21
I for one think this is an excellent idea and anyone not following the convention will not be sold to.
Neo Earth
22-11-2003, 17:24
Rather, at the beginning of a war, the ones fighting it state that they wish to use the GC laws.

Maybe a small alliance (5-members) inforces the GC in wars it is being used.


GC should have:

POW
Bio-weapons
Paratroopers
among other things
Setian-Sebeceans
22-11-2003, 17:25
Should we have the Geneva convention in Nationstates ? Forbidding biological weapons and the like.

Sure you can, but nations like me wouldn't comply to them.
22-11-2003, 17:27
Then you will be an outcast to the world
United Elias
22-11-2003, 17:36
anyone have a link to the wolfish one?
Jaxusism
22-11-2003, 17:43
I think not. Many nations wont comply with it and we wont want to war with them for that reason! This will simply ruin NS.
Biotopia
22-11-2003, 18:01
Hiya, i say let's do this, RP it well [take the original and RP what we do and don't want] and then spread the word/ pop up during wars and point out the convention/ try and get the non Wolfish items passed as resolutions of the UN.
Eredron
22-11-2003, 18:10
This offers several interesting opportunities for the future. We will participate, but cannot pledge ourselves to signing it.
Thelas
22-11-2003, 18:16
llisten pall, members of the U.N. allready have to compley with a ban on bio weapons, but many nations just tell the UN "F--- Off" this convention would have no effect, even signers would just ignore it.
Thelas
22-11-2003, 18:16
llisten pall, members of the U.N. allready have to compley with a ban on bio weapons, but many nations just tell the UN "F--- Off" this convention would have no effect, even signers would just ignore it.
Talkos
22-11-2003, 18:18
Well, we would approve of a player created Geneva Convention if it covers the aformentioned issues. But the real Geneva convention carries things a bit far, including the ban of Napalm, certain types of bullets and lasers, and it's definitions on acceptable(e.g. tear gas) vs. non-acceptable chemical weapons are rather fuzzy.

Show us a outline for what you propose, including the areas that will be covered and then we'll make a decision.
22-11-2003, 18:24
We should put a limit on Nuclear Devices that a country can have at one time but to get more they cant nuke a nation in oblivion.
Sarda
22-11-2003, 18:47
I agree with you Talkos.